Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, I can't remember the name of the package.
That must be cm-super.
--
Florent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bruce Sass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> dselect doesn't force you to install recommended packages; for as long
> as I can remember (since Bo) it has given you a list with the
> recommends preselected, and a simple keypress is all that is needed to
> decline them.
I'm afraid your memory is not
Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Witness:
>> >> - usable completion in the File Open dialog -> gone
[...]
> Note that AFAIK, completion never disappeared from the file open dialogs.
> You just have to enable it with a keystroke.
I know that; the shortcut is Ctrl-L. But I wrote "
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For your information, this was ironic. There is no compositing manager
> in metacity as no one seemed interested enough in developing it.
Ah, I see. Not everyone follows the development of every window manager
on earth, so you couldn't really expect m
Hi,
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eye candy... oh right, this must be why there are so many people
> interested in bringing a compositing manager to metacity, rather than
> improving performance or rendering quality.
YMMV, but IMHO, I don't think compositing will much improve my
SCNR...
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Frank> That turns out not to be the case. If I use an app frequently, then it
Frank> goes on the toolbar. The menu is for finding infrequently used apps. For
Frank> a lot of users, browsing the menu is how they find out what's available.
Mike> IIRC
Hi,
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to gather up some momentum for a policy change. Namely
> that the build-arch/indep targets in debian/rules become required
> instead of being optional.
FWIW, I think that would be a good thing (I remember a discussion with
you on
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
> (If there is a more appropriate list for Defoma-related questions,
> please let me know.)
Maybe pkg-fonts-devel on alioth:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-fonts-devel
> Is there a way to achieve this with Defoma itself or s
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's with having to call apt_pkg.init() manually? That's uncool. It
True, that is very unpythonic. I guess apt_pkg is a very thin and
straight wrapper for the underlying C++ (or is it C?) library.
> should be automatic. Simple in a pure Python packag
Hi,
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And what would be "as needed", for those who never used apt-python or
> even Python at all? Here's my first Python script:
When you don't understand, try it interactively from the Python
interpreter:
% python
Python 2.4.4 (#2, Apr 5 2007, 20:11:18
[ Uh, do we really need debian-devel here? ]
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> masters of dh_installtex,
That's Norbert. ;-)
>> The drawback is that update-updmap, update-language and update-fmtutil
>> are called whereas my package does not need them (and that mktexlsr is
>> called with
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess the difference is more in the historic development than in
> actual technical differences. You can easily use Type1 fonts under X11
> if they are registered to defoma; I don't know about Openoffice and
> friends.
OpenOffice.org can use Latin Mo
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi,
I cannot work on lmodern anymore and am hereby orphaning it.
Description: scalable PostScript fonts for european character sets
The Latin Modern fonts, also known as "lm fonts", are a set of
scalable fonts in PostScript Type 1 format. They are based on the
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi,
I cannot work on PyXMMS-remote anymore and am hereby orphaning it.
Description: command-line interface to XMMS
PyXMMS-remote allows you to control (or start, or terminate) an XMMS
session from your shell's command-line (or a program, or a MIME-aware
applic
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi,
I cannot work on PyXMMS anymore and am hereby orphaning it.
Description: Python interface to XMMS
PyXMMS, packaged as python-xmms in Debian, is a set of Python bindings
for the libxmms library. With PyXMMS, you can control an XMMS session
and manage the XMM
Wim De Smet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not really in favour for this proposal but would you at least read
> the rest off the thread. Splitting the packages off makes it easier for
> the person responsible for installing packages (i.e. the one with root)
> to decide what goes and what doesn't
Tristan Seligmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Firing up a normal web browser to view Sexy Losers with is not much
> harder than using Dosage to download it. This doesn't take away from the
> idea of having a separate package, of course.
If the trend to put "unsuitable material" in -off packages
Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A bad hack. I hate to drop my own binaries to /usr/sbin.
You can make /usr/sbin/policy-rc.d a symlink to the file of your choice
under /usr/local. A bit less bad, but wouldn't prevent something
undesirable happening if you install a package shipping
/usr/sb
Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, it is because the shortcuts are completely non-intuitive. I use
> aptitude for the good intuitive keymapping, not for its menu.
I see. You find them utterly unintuitive, and are not alone. I don't
claim they are really "intuitive" (for what it mea
Blunt Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do I consider this a problem? Not particularly. It is my problem, as
> much as anyone's. This is a sophisticated sysadmin tool, and I am only
> an occasional sysadmin, by no means sophisticated.
So, I guess some people simply don't like the *type* of con
David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 12:03:03PM +0100, Florent Rougon wrote:
>> [1] I still use both versions and happen to often hit instead of
>> when I use sid's one, which doesn't have any bad
>> consequences (simpl
Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Completely and utterly wrong in my case. I'm exactly the sort of person
> that you apparently think should like dselect, but I think aptitude is
> _far_ superior, for both experts and newbies. The competition isn't even
> close.
Did I mention aptitude in
Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Er, these are shortcuts. *shrug*
>
> Uh, so there is a non-shortcut method of operating?
I awaited this comment, but didn't know which other word to use. No, I
don't claim there is a non-shortcut method. I would say that dselects'
control interface co
Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 08:30:50PM -0800, Blunt Jackson wrote:
>>Having
>> "enter" exit the
>> selection process (rather than simply selecting the entry) is
>> perennially surprising,
>
> And the need to use upper-Q in conflict resolution to keep the s
Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 09:48:55AM +0100, Florent Rougon wrote:
>> autodetection to manual setting in my GRUB config files and am happy
>> with this setup (I hate black magic).
>
> Black magic can be good for multi path i
Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I think this is unlikely, since (-s = --scan) is what is used in the
>> Debian aforementioned init script for mdadm (/etc/init.d/mdadm-raid).
>
> That is simply wrong. The mdadm-raid init script uses the mdrun script
> which was written IIRC because of fo
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe the kernel raid1 autodetection only works if raid1 is compiled
> into the kernel.
That is true as explained in:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-raid&m=105232695713715&w=2
In short, to get autostart with md compiled as modules, you need to
Darren Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I find myself wondering if Duff's Device is implementable in Python...
The closest beast I can think of would generate the unrolled loop at
runtime and use 'exec' to run it. But this is a bit off topic for d-d.
--
Florent
Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You've never had to combine 'patch' and Python programs have you? After
> receiving a few created by people with different indent bigotries you
> quickly realise why significant whitespace is a fundamentally bad idea.
>
> I've had to go and ask som
"H. S. Teoh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh, you meant autoindenting as you type... I thought you were referring to
> indenting tools. As long as it's unintrusive, I'm OK with that.
> Unintrusive as in, not anywhere near the atrociousness of MS Word, for
> example.
Um, wasn't this thread about p
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could someone please tell me how to make Home and End to work as they
> did in emacs20, both in console and X?
(global-set-key [home] 'beginning-of-buffer)
(global-set-key [?\e ?\[ ?1 ?~] 'beginning-of-buffer)
(global-set-key [end]
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have one grudge against python, though: its mandated indentation looks
> very ugly and unstructured to me. Kinda reminds me of COBOL (and boy, do
> I have nightmares of having to write COBOL code at school)
Well, I often heared about this argument, b
Norbert Tretkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately Adrian didn't wrote why he thinks backports aren't
> usable for production systems. The only real problem with backports I
> see is that there are no guaranted security updates.
Er, you missed another big one, then: trust. Trusting the
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Python 1.5.2 (#0, Jan 13 2002, 13:19:04) [GCC 2.95.4 20011223 (Debian
> prerelease)] on linux2
> Copyright 1991-1995 Stichting Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam
> >>> ''.lower()
> Traceback (innermost last):
> File "", line 1, in ?
> AttributeError: 's
Roland Bauerschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>> type("dfsfsd")
> >
[...]
> Which Python version are you using?
This was typed under 2.2, as written in my mail.
> >>> type('foo')
>
> >>> type("foo")
>
Yes, this is what you get with 2.1. But David's exception traceback
looked more
Laura Creighton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, I (and several other people) are confused. What does
> 'the next default python' and 'skipping 2.2 entirely' that Chris Lawrence
> writes mean?
It means that, if realized, the next Debian release would have:
- python 2.3 in the "standard" set
Hi,
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Aug 14 18:48:03 2002 qrunner(1300): AttributeError : 'string' object has
> > no
> > attribute 'lower'
>
> This is certainly suspicious, since all Python 'string' objects are supposed
> to have a 'lower()' method, as far as I know.
I can't loo
37 matches
Mail list logo
