now go change the packages I maintain to follow this convention
and (again) consider switching away from svn. :)
--
Fabian Fagerholm
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
e, it could be useful to have a field pointing explicitly to
"trunk or equivalent" and another to the repository root, to facilitate
automation.
Cheers,
--
Fabian Fagerholm
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
7; and 'debootstrap' and
> 'cdebootstrap' will stay broken.
Sorry for the inconvenience. We (the cyrus-sasl2 maintainers) could have
tried lowering the priority of the package first, but that would also
have required manual action by ftp-master to adjust the overrides, so it
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 11:05 +0100, Jan Wagner wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 November 2006 07:53, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> > This new package is a major change compared to the old version.
> > Therefore, we want people to test it as much as possible!
> can you explain short, what are
-sasl2.alioth.debian.org/
* The project list archive is at
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-cyrus-sasl2-debian-devel/
and it should be read thoroughly -- lots of details about packaging choices are
available there.
Thanks,
--
Fabian Fagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
etting up such a poll?
Who is on the CC mailing list and could make sure the result would be
communicated there?
[0] http://master.debian.org/~jeroen/polls/
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2005/12/msg00216.html
[2] http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/6017
--
Fabian Fagerholm <[EM
r people who feel they are in need of a mediator. Descriptions of
cases that went well or went wrong are also useful.
--
Fabian Fagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
r before the "Why the GNU Free Documentation License is not
suitable for Debian main" GR?
--
Fabian Fagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In necessariis unitas, in dubiis libertas, in omnibus caritas.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
nd there should be a way to specify such
dependencies on the package management system level.
Cheers,
--
Fabian Fagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
sts for /horse dung/."
Go figure.
All quotes from Liungman (see above) and apologies for the missing
pictures, but honestly you do not want me to try these in ASCII...
--
Fabian Fagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ropose: the
"plain" flavor. The definition is obvious. It's what you get when not
specifically choosing a flavor. Currently, only the plain flavor of
Debian or any of its Custom Distributions exists.
There is an enormous amount of things that can be drawn from this, and I
have ma
for that out of the box would be appealing?
So what you've described is only one aspect of (how I see) Debian
Enterprise.
--
Fabian Fagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
must get back to you on that.
Sorry, I have to run now, but I'll try to get back to this asap. Don't
worry, the terms will be good and then we can all get back to
implementing things when we have the words to communicate with.
Cheers,
--
Fabian Fagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
xt from all who have some
experience with subprojects, and work that material into the HOWTO. I
will contact some subproject people shortly to get their input. Any
pointers will be appreciated.
Cheers,
--
Fabian Fagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 12:17, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> > The term suggests that the distribution is "not-Debian", which is
> > unneccessary and confusing.
>
> As non native speaker and also in general I try to avoid join
general to instantly give someone an idea of what it's
about, and on top of all, it's quite long.
Compare with "package pool" -- anyone with decent knowledge of the
English language, and who knows what a "package" is, will instantly see
the idea. I think "flavor" fits into the same category.
--
Fabian Fagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
haring the same
package pool. If you look at Bdale's platform from the last DPL
election, you'll see that he summarized these things quite nicely:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200303/msg00014.html
So I suggest the following terms:
Debian is the super-project.
XYZ is a Debian Subproject,
which provides the flavors A, B and C.
Opinions?
--
Fabian Fagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
on).
>
> I think this is a serious bug: the functionality of the free version
> has been lowered to promote patent emcumbered package.
I don't understand what you mean. Do you have a solution to the patent
problem, perhaps? Or are you suggesting that a compression-free version
of
ntained in this package for dates of expiration in
countries which are known to have this patent. Use at your own legal
risk."
For more information, see http://burnallgifs.org/
--
Fabian Fagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-05-16
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: albatross
Version : 1.01
Upstream Author : Object Craft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.object-craft.com.au/projects/albatross/
* License : BSD
Description : a Toolki
On Fri, 2002-01-04 at 17:29, Colin Walters wrote:
> > > The target audience is everyone who uses a computer.
> >
> > OK, but that is not very clear a goal. What do we want with all those
> > people? Do we want them all to use Debian? If so, what should be done to
> > accomplish this goals?
>
> Ye
On Fri, 2002-01-04 at 19:08, Rick Younie wrote:
> Great post. I hope you do find your place to start and don't get
> discouraged and move on to something else.
Of all the posts on this thread... Let's just say there are ways to get
people involved and ways to get people to go away. This belongs t
On Fri, 2002-01-04 at 02:23, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> smooth introduction? you never heard of policy, maint-guide, developers'
> reference, web pages, etc, have you?
I have. That is not what I call a smooth introduction. For a person who
can devote, say 24 hours per month to working on a pro
On Fri, 2002-01-04 at 00:24, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Most of us who work for Debian do this in our spare time. But I do
> personally disagree with the "you can't force a volunteer to do anything"
> argument I heard in several discussions. These were discussions about
> things where some work of the ma
24 matches
Mail list logo
