Re: Resolutions to comments on LSB-FHS-TS_SPEC_V1.0

pool is not relevant to > an application and is administrator policy. It is thus left open.] > > > Can everyone live with that and bury the thread Works for me, too. -- http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr";>Eric S. Raymond If a thousand men were not to pay their tax-bills th

Re: Debian's "Modify & Redistribute" Policy (was: the ncurses

ly there is a way to solve this problem within the Debian license constraints. See paragraph 1 of the license constraints in the "Social Contract" and consider the implications. -- http://www.ccil.org/~esr";>Eric S. Raymond -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIS

Re: the ncurses "brushfire" -- anybody want to take over the project?

> "Eric S. Raymond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Michael Alan Dorman wrote: > > >ESR has, IMHO, decided to start a pissing match about ncurses > > >development. I have no desire to participate or watch. > > Mr. Dorman's opinion is unders

the ncurses "brushfire" -- anybody want to take over the project?

here willing to take on this responsibility? There's an awful lot of good work in ncurses. I think everyone would consider it a shame if that all went to waste. -- http://www.ccil.org/~esr";>Eric S. Raymond -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word &quo