, for
which I have heartfelt support and which however stopped the
upgrade flow at least 5 times
[5] Do we have a thing that clones the running system into a throwaway
VM?
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Enrico Zini
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: eumdac
Version : 3.0.0
Upstream Contact: EUMETSAT
* URL : https://gitlab.eumetsat.int/eumetlab/data-services/eumdac
* License : MIT
Programming
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Enrico Zini
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: fcidecomp
Version : 2.1.1
Upstream Contact: EMUETSAT
* URL :
https://gitlab.eumetsat.int/open-source/data-tailor-plugins/fcidecomp
* License
building just work.
Thanks! In the end I managed to turn everything into a hopefully
well-behaved toplevel CMakeLists.txt, and go ahead with a standard
debian/rules: https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/fcidecomp
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
y to tell debhelper that cmake and make need to be
called multiple times?
* Is there a better way to approach all this?
Thanks!
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
oday and break tomorrow.
Could --shallow-since= (one month ago, or one year ago) be another
possible thing to consider?
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
that Debtags is still
primarily my problem is not the course of action that I'd like to take.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
t some day, thanks
to you and others like you, those >=5 people at a DebConf will really
look at me wide-eyed and show me a way out of the pit.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
closer to having a declarative license ID.
In general the less bytes I have to maintain in debian/* the happier I
am, and as a personal aesthetic sense I feel like the less bytes we all
have to maintain in debian/* the less is our collective maintenance
burden.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
can pick one and document it as an
accepted standard, until some build tool will set it by default, in
which case it'll only become redundant?
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Enrico Zini
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-scie...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: pylsl
Version : 1.16.1
Upstream Contact: Christian A. Kothe
* URL : https://github.com/labstreaminglayer/pylsl
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Enrico Zini
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-scie...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: liblsl
Version : 4.6.0
Upstream Contact: Christian A. Kothe
* URL : https://github.com/sccn/liblsl
* License : MIT
e that may break existing configured systems.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
m/mesonbuild/meson/issues/8739
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Enrico Zini
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-hdf5plugin
Version : 3.3.1
Upstream Author : "ESRF - Data Analysis Unit"
* URL : https://github.com/silx-kit/hdf5plugin
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Enrico Zini
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: h5z-zfp
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Author : Mark C. Miller
* URL : https://github.com/LLNL/H5Z-ZFP
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
es,
and if no other DD has picked up its maintenance by then, I'm going to
announce a plan for taking it offline.
debtags.debian.org is a Django site. Its code is at
https://salsa.debian.org/debtags-team/debtagsd
Thanks,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
I'm posting this to debian-devel as an early heads-up and a call for
other maintainers. If nobody steps in my the end of October, I'll post a
proper sunset announce to debian-devel-announce.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
I haven't had a chance to investigate why with a failed configure phase
an old initrd was left there, and why configure failed but a new
configure didn't regenerate the initd, so it may be that I hit a corner
case.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
o I don't know how worse this would get.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
G key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
than external
overrides of it.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
fit for upload in
Debian, though an actual call about this should probably come from the
PHP maintainer community, not from me.
I'm trying to move this discussion back to debian-devel, since it was
becoming too on-topic for debian-curiosa
Enrico
[1] honestly, I would feel trolled
--
GPG key
ies
from which he has also been banned.
[1] https://www.debian.org/News/2021/2027
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
of conflicting tutorials.
I'm not talking about mandating the way everyone has to do their work in
Debian.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ard packaging workflow":
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/grow-your-ideas/-/issues/24
There's been some good discussion in this direction a few years ago, and
it never went as far as I'd have liked.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
btags.debian.org/exports/overrides/main
https://debtags.debian.org/exports/overrides/contrib
https://debtags.debian.org/exports/overrides/non-free
Wrt debtags pushing automatically, I wouldn't mind, but I don't know how to do
it without needing a GPG signature to do an upload.
Id
key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
27;ve attempted a few times to work with ftp-master to get dak to pull
data from debtags.debian.org directly, and even though it doesn't look
like a complicated issue, it looks like it's low priority enough that
every attempt got stuck so far.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7A
even such a setup so much better. I would consider
voicing those ideas, without having made a serious effort to understand
the peculiarities of the system that is supposed to adopt them, an act
of extremely bad taste.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
and raising issues to the body of Debian Developers at
large.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Enrico Zini
* Package name: publicdecompwt
Version : 2.7.2
Upstream Author : EUMETSAT http://www.eumetsat.int/
* URL :
https://gitlab.eumetsat.int/open-source/PublicDecompWT
* License : Apache
Programming Lang: C
is (Built-Using?) ?
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
I really like your idea!
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ening a bug as
good as I can, being ignored for years, except for a bot that
occasionally tells me "if you don't reply to this I'll close the bug and
it's your fault for not caring".
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
log in.
You can find extensive and up to date documentation on how to make it
work here: https://wiki.debian.org/DebianSingleSignOn
This said, I would prefer not to see this kind of attitude in any of the
places I use to work with others.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-
it for, is probably not up to me to choose, although
being responsible for maintaining the two current biggest consumers of
SSO auth in Debian, I'd like it to happen sooner rather than later.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
nd eventually can
help to shape it.
I don't mean for this to be specific to the FTP team. I guess this
thread gave me an opportunity to voice my more general thoughts.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
an/pkgshelf/
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
sical transition, so this normally
> helpful comment from tracker.d.o doesn't really apply. Please ignore it.
Ack, wonderful.
> As explained above, you'll not be interfering, so go ahead.
Perfect, I have gone ahead with a new source-only upload.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4B
he way by delaying the
transition and requiring supplementary work from the release managers?
I feel a bit caught in a bureaucratic corner. Please help me with some
directions to get out of that.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
e people have started forks, but I haven't tracked development there.
This said, I'd say feel free to use any non-free solution that might
help your work, as long as it doesn't become a required part of Debian's
infrastructure.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 20
standards as
possible would make it much easier to navigate that diversity.
Enrico
[1] like often me
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
8 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
in participating, both in reading, and in writing
when they have something to ask or say.
Enrico
[1] recent examples off the top of my head:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2019/09/msg00365.html
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2019/09/msg00366.html
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4B
tatus quo, but to consider of a GR to
force the status quo to fit to your expectations.
This cannot be the discussion culture of a group where I can be
comfortable working with others.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
hercive twist in some of your mails.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
I understand more or less as "do something at random and
please don't suddenly disappear".
Enrico
[1] https://wiki.debian.org/LowThresholdNmu
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
md.
I'm not sure I'd drive this much forward than having gotten unitd
published as a possible starting point, should such a base be needed:
indeed, one can also extend start-stop-daemon in that direction.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
o.
Enrico
[1] today's a national holiday in Italy:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferragosto
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ing not to do
any of it if I can avoid it. Excited at what is currently going on,
waiting excitedly at something sane to get established as a standard
and gain clear documentation and simple tooling. Possibly, as little
tooling as possible over a decently maintained upstream source."
the wiki with pages for each branch formats could
both provide a link to details to take some load off the big table, and
create a space where the rest of the documentation can grow.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
table might end up being simplified by having links to
the detail pages.
Thank you for your work on this, by the way. I'm really excited at the
idea of a taxonomy and details of debian mantenance workflows!
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ftware/debdate/tree/debdate
:)
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
o adopt a standard workflow, because they come already
documented.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
ee if changing build
system would be an possible strategy for fixing bugs in an NMU.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
good catch! I should have fixed it now.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
I have ported debtags.debian.org to Bootstrap 4, it should now be
easier for development, and work better on mobile devices.
Let me know if you like it, or if I broke something.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Enrico Zini
* Package name: fascism
Version : 19190323
Upstream Author : Too many forks to list
* URL : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism
* License : All rights revoked
Section : non-free
Description
sso, but the other way round.
> So please don't.
Please do not switch Alioth off, nor disable creation of new accounts on
alioth, until then. Being able to get a SSO certificate as a non-DD is
currently a required step to become a DD.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5
out it for now, and refer people who ask me about
it, to this thread.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
n stretch of getting apache to authenticate
against gitlab?
Enrico
[1] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianEvents/it/2018/SnowCamp
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 01:36:55PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
> I found the reason: python-cryptography writes the certificate issuer
> as UTF8 String while the CA certificate has it as Printable String.
> Because of that, the subject names don't match bit-by-bit.
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 01:36:55PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 11:37:01AM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
>
> > I refactored the certificate generation code for sso.debian.org, and the
> > certificates it generates now still work in Firefox but not in Chrome
On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 11:37:01AM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
> I refactored the certificate generation code for sso.debian.org, and the
> certificates it generates now still work in Firefox but not in Chrome.
I found the reason: python-cryptography writes the certificate issuer
as UTF8
it. Can you generate a new certificate and see if you still find
differences?
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
before the refactoring:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-sso/debian-sso.git/tree/ca/ca.py?id=926d5ca1c448fdd4f02ae7247ef5f695d8e2f22e#n331
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
accounts in a single
LDAP, regardless of the SSO system used.
+1 to that!
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ps://wiki.debian.org/Chromium so that it now contains some
information also on why they are disabled.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
date in
"chrome://extensions/", enable Developer Mode, click on "Update
extensions now")
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
how I can
deal with it cleanly, and that I can easily send to confused people?
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
've added instructions for it to
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianSingleSignOn#chromium_.2F_chrome
This now paves the way for adding automatic key generation and refresh
features to https://github.com/spanezz/debsso-client
Exciting!
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-
where I might have data that is
being backed up.
Would it be possible to generate a report of where is (and how much is)
stuff that I own in all bits of filesystem that are being backed up?
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
he process
of enrolling with chrome could be easily scripted.
Help?
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ey: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Enrico Zini
* Package name: staticsite
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Enrico Zini
* URL : https://github.com/spanezz/staticsite
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Static site generator
use the packaged versions instead.
Perfect, thank you both, that seems to solve my problem entirely, and
it's far far easier than I feared at first.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
hat if you received a message signed with key 9F6C6333?
That is, what do you do (please list the practical steps) to validate a
signature that is a few steps away from your key in the WoT?
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
key IDs give me only a false sense of security and
go ahead without "keyid-format long". I'll download the key used to sign
the message:
$ gpg2 --homedir /tmp/keyring/ --recv 837275A9
gpg: /tmp/keyring//trustdb.gpg: trustdb created
gpg: key E7AD5568: public key
;,
"status_changed": "1003968000",
"email": "enr...@master.debian.org",
"cn": "Enrico"
}
It is now ready for actually useful stuff to be added, and from my side
it will probably be something to make DAM review of new processes easier
as I do DAM review of new processes.
I look forward to having other features come in from other people who
need them.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
* a script that removes expired keys from the browser.
* a command line front end to all sort of Debian services that require
authentication.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
it.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ributors.debian.org).
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
pporting WebID either, and given how I've seen one of the WebID
people argue their case[1] with the Chrome and Firefox developers, the
little interest they might have had to start with is probably gone by
now :/
Enrico
[1]
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!msg/blink-dev/
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 11:22:53AM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
> So, chrome just went and removed support for it. It now just silently
> fails. It can be reenabled somehow, but then the key is not pushed into
> the browser keystore, but only downloaded. No viable alternative
> sugge
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 10:14:15AM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
> The error is reproducible while running a checkout of debsso locally on
> a ./manage.py runserver. See README for dependencies, and
> django-oauth-toolkit and django-cors-headers are now at least in Debian
> testing.
&
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 08:05:17PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
> some people have reported getting a "/usr/bin/openssl failed" error when
> enrolling their browser on sso.debian.org, and I am not able to deal
> with it. Help?
The error is reproducible while running a checkout o
ere: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2015/08/msg00539.html
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
a d-d-a post, a bit in developers-reference)
3. do it
if a overly-territorial person fails to respond to those without a good
reason (I can only think of "I was VAC"), I don't think we have much to
lose.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
bian.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
aving different behaviour
according to what combinations of different PPAs are added to a system.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
right now?
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
int with
something else, because collab-maint also has some other serious
problems that I'm looking forward to see fixed. There has been some
talking at the last DebConf about this, but I do not know if and how
things have advanced.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
pt attached)
> Should that go here?
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/debian-fun.git
Feel free.
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
nly quiz installed packages
-a, --answersshow the correct answers in case you missed it
--hard choose other descriptions from similar packages
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
1 - 100 of 303 matches
Mail list logo