me contributions.
Please let me know if you have any questions, comments or
concerns. Thanks in advance!
Duncan Findlay
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What can I do to satisfy those with and without anacron, and to avoid
hammering the sa-update servers at a specific time?
Thanks!
--
Duncan Findlay
pgpqxfJCSucpx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
.9.x. (At least, I
haven't found a problem with it.)
I'd be happy to co-maintain the package if you would like a
co-maintainer. (Though I'm not going to have much time for Debian in
the next couple of weeks.)
--
Duncan Findlay
pgpXn9aVLoOuf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ly rebuilding while
processing if necessary; however, this can be problematic as multiple
processes try to access the same database while it's being synced,
causing them to wait (often for a while). (IIRC)
--
Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 04:45:57PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Duncan Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > When spamassassin is upgraded, it's more than just the rules. Often
> > the method of parsing the message is changed -- leading to better
> >
; rule, which might require the volatile-managers or
> > whoever to be Real Programmers and not just compilers.
Hmm..
--
Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
and you'll see it within twenty
> minutes.
Do you limit the size of the messages you sacn?
--
Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 09:52:40AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Duncan Findlay
>
> | On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 06:43:47PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> | > * martin f krafft
> | >
> | > | What do you think?
> | >
> | > API changed generally means y
s.
> >
> > The above was a /direct/ quote from the 2.64-1 changelog:
Sorry, I missed that.
Only a few rules were actually backported, according to SVN.
--
Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
gain, woody has 2.20, which is
so incredibly obsolete right now, I wonder if it does more harm than
good.)
The truth is a large portion of stable users rely on spamassassin
backports. Packaging spamassassin3 right now is probably not all that
useful.
--
Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Furthermore, you should use the -m option to limit the number of
children to something sane, like 5 or so.
--
Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
e were
aware of much that actually parses output and searches for these
strings (which are configurable anyways, AFAIK).
> Don Armstrong
>
> 1: I'll grant that score is more logical than hit, but I really don't
> see the point...
The point is that we want SpamAssassin to be
scripts, or spamc/spamd
or the SPAMD protocol directly. (These are all fine.)
> In that case, it should provide a backwards-compatible interface.
This was contemplated, but deemed to be difficult and ugly.
--
Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
a
spawning option, so the number specified by -m should be decreased.
--
Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 04:43:53PM -0400, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> > The only negative rules will be: bayesian rules, bondedsender and
> > habeas. Figuring how to autolearn ham (non-spam) is the only obstacle
> > we still need to
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 10:03:45AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 11:19:10PM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> > FWIW, the next version of spamassassin (2.60) will have no forgeable
> > negatively scoring rules. (ETA early-mid July)
>
> Just out of curios
ve no forgeable
negatively scoring rules. (ETA early-mid July)
--
Duncan Findlay
pgpO8jKiZXc3t.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 09:57:50PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
> PS. Personally, I would prefer to travel for a DebConf in
> Cuba than in US. Really.
Who wouldn't? You got the sun, the beaches and the ocean... what more
could you ask for than a debconf on a beach?
--
Dun
ness.
> Where can I find more information?
http://www.spamassassin.org/
--
Duncan Findlay
lus, the assume guilty
until proven innocent thing is ridiculous. What's also stupid is
people who deliver messages found to be spam to /dev/null.
What makes sense is to save all mail, and actually _look_ through
messages tagged as spam to ensure that there are no False Positives.
SpamAssassin can do this, and does it well. There are better solutions
to the spam problem than yours.
--
Duncan Findlay
pgpFZWUxQM6wE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
to be
recreated, but I would consider it a bug if they aren't. Anyone agree?
--
Duncan Findlay
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 01:14:07PM +0200, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
>
> Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Duncan Findlay wrote:
> > > Is there any way of keeping razor out of woody until spamassassin 2.2 can
> > > be
> > > uploaded? (I coul
as I can.
Please hold razor at 1.19-1 iff you use spamassassin. If you just use razor,
feel free to use 1.20-1.
--
Duncan Findlay
pgpTQpH1oEUMb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
week.
--
Duncan Findlay
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rger than 250k. Messages
larger than 250k take way too long to scan because of the regexps used, and
large messages are rarely spam.
--
Duncan Findlay
pgpP3JMw8VVP7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 09:07:27PM -0400, Sean Middleditch wrote:
> On Wed, 2001-09-26 at 20:50, Ben Burton wrote:
> >
> > > British English is beautiful where it appears in poems, plays, and
> > > novels by Shakespeare and Wilde and other brilliant English authors.
> > > It certainly does N
ink that Canadians use American English, after all, we are
neighbours, but that's totally incorrect.
I apologise, I have not been following this thread until now, so if I just
said exactly what someone else said, that please feel free to ignore me.
Duncan Findlay
ght?
>
> Err, "(foo OR bar OR baz) AND foo" != "(bar or baz) AND foo",
> because it can also be "foo AND foo" (= "foo").
>
So essentially it is the same as "foo", bar and baz are irrelevant.
Duncan Findlay
28 matches
Mail list logo
