Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> The biggest difficulty, as far as I can tell from my look at Chromium from
> several months ago, is that our patch set [1] needs a lot of attention with
> every chromium release.
And let me ask another silly question: where can we actually see a CI log for a
failed buil
Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 07:58:17PM +0300, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote:
>> >> So what's happening with chromium in both sid and stable? I saw on
>> >> d-release that it was removed from testing (#998676 and #998732), with a
>> >>
Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 05-12-2021 03:36, Andres Salomon wrote:
>> So what's happening with chromium in both sid and stable? I saw on d-release
>> that it was removed from testing (#998676 and #998732), with a discussion
>> about ending security support for it in stable.
>
> The problem really
> On 26/03/17 01:01, Walter Landry wrote:
>> Florian Weimer wrote:
#5 Declare GMP to be a system library.
>>> (snip)
>>>
#5 was how Fedora looked at the OpenSSL library issue. Since Debian
has another viewpoint on OpenSSL I somehow doubt we would use it for
GMP.
>>>
>>> I
4 matches
Mail list logo
