John Paul Adrian Glaubitz writes:
> The license issue was just an example (hence the braces). The reasoning
> is that the Debian packaging is supposed to be independent of upstream,
> especially since we cannot always follow upstream, during a freeze, for
> example.
That makes sense.
> Assume
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz writes:
>
> On 03/03/2013 08:33 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>> Would you consider adding one of the active contributors to Subsurface
>> as a co-maintainer? This is currently a really fast moving project
>> (3.0.2 will come out tonight or tomorrow,
Khalid El Fathi writes:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry to answer only now... I was busy with my work. I think I can update the
> package soon.
That's great news.
Would you consider adding one of the active contributors to Subsurface
as a co-maintainer? This is currently a really fast moving project
(3.0.2 wi
Robert Wolfe writes:
> Um, forgot about me already, hmm? :) And yes, libdivecomputer-3.0.1
> in .DEB format is also available on my site if anyone wants to try
> that (in RPM format, too).
Not at all. The problem with your approach to creating a package was
that you are using the tool that is q
Dmitrijs Ledkovs writes:
>
> I have only one dive of a whole 8m deep, but I am ubuntu & debian
> developer and can upload this package to debian/ubuntu and a ppa.
>
> Is there any packaging done so far? Point me to it, if not just file
> Debian RFP and CC me on it.
There are old packages for Subs
On Feb 28, 2013, at 12:03 PM, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
>> And for those I try to make their lives easier.
>
> Of course. Where do you get all that energy from? I'm impressed.
> Really.
Actually, I just decided to give up. This is an utter waste of my time.
Whatever. Someone who cares m
6 matches
Mail list logo
