On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 05:12:26PM -0400, Sean Middleditch wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 16:54, David Odin wrote:
> > Well, the main problem I have with supermount and not have with
> > automount is the following:
> > I'm a CS teacher, and the linux distributi
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 07:54:48PM +0200, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Joseph Carter wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 12:06:23PM +0200, David Odin wrote:
>
> > > The way of acting is the same as supermount, but it won't let
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 07:38:26PM +1000, David Findlay wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 19:25, David Odin wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 07:17:38PM +1000, David Findlay wrote:
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED ME
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 07:17:38PM +1000, David Findlay wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Is there a particular reason why Supermount couldn't be included in the
> debian unstable kernels as an option? It works brilliantly on Mandrake, and
> makes things much easier to
4 matches
Mail list logo
