ng.
>
> I'm not following the updates for bazel packaging, but you
> may browse the packaging work of the corresponding team
> to see whether there is anything you are interested in:
> https://salsa.debian.org/bazel-team/bazel
>
> On Wed, 2022-06-08 at 17:18 +0200, David G
I'm looking into converting some of my upstream packages to use Google's
bazel build system, because it makes life much easier as a developer.
Unfortunately, with my other hat on, it makes life much harder as a package
maintainer: bazel is very keen on downloading source packages and then
building
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
[...]
> How much are these instruction set compatible with the classical m68k
> processors? Would we be able to have an m68k port of Debian which runs
> both on the original m68k CPUs and the ColdFire series?
AFAIK the ColdFire is nearly, but not quite, a strict su
On 25/11/12 19:02, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
[...]
> I've been a vivid Amiga user since 1991* and I still love these
> machines and I am supporting the efforts to get Debian back onto
> m68k. Yet, I do not think this should happen at all costs. There
> haven't been no new 68k processors for
On 22/09/12 15:28, peter green wrote:
[...]
> In order to build successfully nacl needs to determine the CPU frequency
> (the CPU frequency determined at build time is not used in the final
> binaries afaict but if it's not determined then the build will fail as
> it will consider the implementatio
Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
[...]
> There's still no such thing as the "GNU Public License", what the
> author seemingly try to refer to is called "GNU General Public
> License", that is, the 'G' in "GPL" stands for "General", not for "GNU".
IRL that's actually a link to the FSF page, so it seems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Neil Williams wrote:
[...]
> The problems described in #501638 would mean that the package would
> not be allowed back into Debian unless fixed.
It looks like this isn't an issue any more --- the relevant paragraph
from the docs is now:
Ted is fr
Thomas Goirand wrote:
[...]
> Exactly what do you need from sbin as a user?
I use stuff from sbin as user all the time. A quick glance at /sbin
shows these commands that I use on a regular basis:
blkid
fdisk
all the fscks
all the mkfss
hdparm
ifconfig (before this discussion I'd never even *heard
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
[...]
> I would recommend in the meantime to use a versioned URL of your
> choosing. As I believe is documented - the specific URL should be only
> an example.
FWIW, I have recently tried to put together a DEP5 compliant copyright
file for a package I'm working on. I say
e sensitive filenames, inode semantics, etc.
While installation is still a bit tortuous, they have a buildd and claim
to support a decent number of packages...
Is this of interest to anyone?
- --
David Given
d...@cowlark.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Usi
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
[...]
> Up until 1968 the same reasoning wasused to present people from
> connecting anything but phones provided by Bell to the Bell telephone
> network. You were not even allowed to connect a modem through an
> accustic coupler.
If I recall correctly, back in the old days,
because most firmware images
contain proprietary embedded operating systems and/or proprietary
third-party libraries...
--
David Given
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
f their software in such
environments; do these count as DSFG-free? Is there any such software in
Debian?
--
David Given
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
so paranoid about reflashing phones. A phone with a maliciously
programmed GSM stack would turn into a rather efficient cellphone jammer.)
--
David Given
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andreas Bombe wrote:
[...]
> The user may have
> imported the configuration from some other machine, or intend to use the
> configuration elsewhere. The usefulness of user configuration is
> therefore not tied to the installed state of the package on this system.
Particularly since the user may h
Michael Biebl wrote:
[...]
> Add update-initramfs to that list. It can take quite some time to
> regenerate the initramfs. Packages that update the initramfs are e.g.
> udev, cryptsetup or uswsusp, splashy/usplash
*raises hand*
Before it blew up, my old NSLU2 (a 266MHz ARM with 32MB RAM) used to
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
[...]
I'd really rather see something nicer than an ant as a mascot. :)
How about a cockroach? Beautifully engineered, indestructable, and
they're *everywhere*...
--
David Given
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Goerzen wrote:
[...]
> Too crude? That's a simple command, easily found in a relevant manpage. In
> true Unix fashion, its output can be easily piped to other commands. What's
> crude about it?
Well, it doesn't actually tell me what I need t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
[...]
> I like this idea, especially if there were a short description about each
> program and relevent configuration files.
I like this too. Finding what a package has just installed is one of the
biggest holes in Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michelle Konzack wrote:
[...]
> since 2007-08-01 I am now jobless (yeah, the new French GOV do not like
> that I stay in the army as PMC) and today (Saturday) I was asked by an
> owner of a german Enterprise whether it is possibel to port GNU/Linux,
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joerg Jaspert wrote:
[...]
> Those that pass NEW for whatever reason are reviewed. Yes, I did reject
> lots of such packages for copyright-file brokenness. :)
Speaking as someone who has just had a package pass NEW, I would like to thank
you for doubl
n *cough* tcl/tk, and
packaging it looks horribly complicated.
--
David Given
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ben Finney wrote:
[...]
> It would behoove you to at least put significant effort into
> what everyone here agrees would be the best way to get Opera working
> well with Debian and other free software operating systems.
Mmf.
I'd take issue with that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> looks pretty cool, but someone should talk to them about this:
>
> "The effect of this is that distribution-provided packages are often
> more reliable than upstream ones (since upstream don't get to hear about
> many
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eduard Bloch wrote:
[...]
> If you want to keep the files aside but ie.
> compressed than you should use a compressing filesystem.
> But if you want something working on access, expect it to perform very bad.
> Ie. if you want to install the files fro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roger Leigh wrote:
[...]
> I would personally like to see this happen, but until it does we are
> limited (I believe) to the glyphs described in groff_char(7). I am
> not aware of any Japanese support at all except in specially-patched
> versions.
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm trying to package a simple tool that wants a Japanese string in its man
page. It would appear that currently, man pages use fixed encodings that vary
depending on which locale's man page is being looked up; English uses
ISO-8859-1, so it's not
27 matches
Mail list logo
