Re: VMware packaging

ves me suspicious that the rest of your post is equally full of misinformation. -- Dave Carrigan Seattle, WA, USA [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.rudedog.org/ UNIX-Apache-Perl-Linux-Firewalls-LDAP-C-C++-DNS-PalmOS-PostgreSQL-MySQL-Postfix pgpzfFd168ucW.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: State of gcc 2.95 use in Debian unstable

users away from Debian to other distributions. -- Dave Carrigan Seattle, WA, USA [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.rudedog.org/ UNIX-Apache-Perl-Linux-Firewalls-LDAP-C-C++-DNS-PalmOS-PostgreSQL-MySQL-Postfix signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: State of gcc 2.95 use in Debian unstable

On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 06:00:06PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > this makes it IMHO a plausible release goal to get rid of 2.95 > maintenance for etch. No it is not. Just because debian packages don't use 2.95 doesn't mean that end users have the same luxury. -- Dave Carrigan

Re: MEI Whitelist Autoresponse

I have not sent (spam and viruses with my forged email address). I no longer read them, but dump them just like I dump the 'virus in your email' messages. So, if I ever send mail to a legitimate person who has CR, he's never going to get my message, because I refuse to waste my time re

Re: spamasassin/razor (do not upgrade)

17 08:53:11 pern spamd[17594]: undefined Razor::Client Apr 17 08:53:11 pern spamd[17594]: razor check skipped: undefined Razor::Client That went away after I disabled razor checks in my configs. I update from a non-official mirror, so my updates might be behind by a day or so. -- Dave Carrigan