On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 11:19:56PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Thu, 30 Sep 1999, Darren Benham wrote:
>
> > No, seriously, that's how it's created but as long as we don't start
> > ignoring
> > bugs, we'll never see or 9 bugs i
Then close some bugs :)
No, seriously, that's how it's created but as long as we don't start ignoring
bugs, we'll never see or 9 bugs in a single directory.
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 11:46:07PM +0200, Thomas Schoepf wrote:
>
> I'm currently working on a tool that automatically fetches all
On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 06:23:27PM +0200, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> Of course not, but only the package maintainer is supposed to close bugs on
> her package. Even other Debian developers should use the fixed state.
>
Unless somebody's changed something while I wasn't looking, Debian accepts
submit
What do you think?
- Forwarded message from Samuel Tardieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
On 21/09, Darren Benham wrote:
| And do what... there are going to be keys that aren't in the debian keyring..
Non-developpers should not be allowed to *manipulate* bugs IMO.
- End forwar
The BTS should check pgp signatures?
On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 10:49:44PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Joseph Carter wrote:
> > Essentially, it does exactly what people like me have been complaining it
> > didn't do: IGNORE the MIME/PGP/whatever crap and just read the message.
>
> T
On Sun, Sep 19, 1999 at 02:27:20PM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
> With an alias so that X-Debian-CC still works?
Not guarenteed... It's not in the "upstream" package so I'd have to remeber to
put it in every time I upgrade..
> > Some of the perl scripts have been made -w clean.
>
> and `use strict;
I thought some of you might be interested in a few changes that have been
made to the BTS software...
In the new software, the X-Debian-CC was changed to X-Debbugs-CC (more
general) and it appears to be working.
Some of the perl scripts have been made -w clean.
A column was added to http://www.d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 45417 emacs19
Bug#45417: general: Lines referring to package remain in /etc/suid.conf after
purging
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `emacs19'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
2000. In the meantime...
--
Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also.
=
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* ---- * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*
We can ask the new project leader to issue the permission and ask for the link
when the election is through ;)
On 29-Jan-99 Ben Collins wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 1999 at 09:51:51AM -0800, Darren Benham wrote:
>>
>> On 29-Jan-99 Brian Ristuccia wrote:
>> > In order to pro
n they are done ;)
>
--
Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also.
=
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* * -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- --
p to the (even if it is broken) license.
--
Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also.
=
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* * -BEGIN GEEK COD
seems a little... well.. not in the spirit but I could live
with it.
--
Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also.
=
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
*
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* -------- * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++> P+
ng list replies to me, also.
=
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
=
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
* Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL
p://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++> P+++$ L++>*
* KC7YAQ * E? W+++$ N+(-) o? K- w+
==
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* -------- * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++>
you should be one of those to decide on the final
contestant logos.
- --
=
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- --
t/index.html <>< *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- -------*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++> P+++$ L++>*
* KC7YAQ *
ld
probably be acceptable as long as it was put in automaticly.
--
=
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* -------- * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1
"compatible". [Remember how the old Qt license
> said it was compatible with the GPL, even though the converse wasn't
> true?]
I know. This is the worse section of the document right now and we're all
still wrangling over it.
--
==
==
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> *
--BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- -------*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++> P+++$ L++>*
* KC7YAQ * E? W+++$ N+(-) o? K- w+++$(--) O M-- V- PS-- *
* Debian Developer * PE++ Y++ PGP++ t+ 5 X R+
==
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* ---- * -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++> P+++$ L++>
==
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* ---- * -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* <[
hese two clauses redundant? And should 3.6.2 be interpreted to
> extend to other identifiers besides name or number (such as icon used
> in a GUI to identify the software, or a logo affiliated with the
> software)?
No, the first refers to using the author's name (such as Buddha B
they have to filter through the make system
=
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Dar
--- start
Debian Free Software Guidelines
---
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Darren Benham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
that wanted to use it in any way-shape-form.
=
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*
be used when referring
> specifically to Debian" is plenty and probably still unenforceable.
Maybe
=
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 24-Jan-99 Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Darren Benham wrote:
>> The current license? Are you sure? It needs to be rewritten if for no
>> other
>> reason but to remove the expiration date.
>
> Okay, so I should have read
tion date.
=
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
*
eb packages. ;-)
>
> Thanks,
> Havoc
=
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1
not start THAT discussion again,
ok?
--
=
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* <[EMAIL PROTECT
to
print a document, you had to go to your office window and shout "I'm using
foobar printer written by john smith"?
--
=========
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* --
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++> P+++$ L++>*
*
n expect that part of the draft to be gone in the next
version.
--
=
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* ---- * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BL
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++> P
lines
---
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Darren Benham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
draft version 2.4.1 18 January 1999
Copyright Notice
copyright ©1999 Anthony Towns & Dar
==
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* ---- * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* &
it because Debian as a whole
has accepted it into the current DFSG.
=
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* -------- * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1
so the
majority of the responses you (or anyone) is going to get will be critical to
one degree or another.
=
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham *
again?
>
--
=
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * GCS d+(-) s:+ a2
debian/navbar.wml as well as
one of the news files in News/1997 (19971125.wml)
=
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- -
I didn't want it in contrib or non-free :( Mine won't port.
=
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- --
==
* http://benham.net/index.html <>< *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * GCS d+(-) s
. Should I make two packages, include both in one
> package or just drop the non-gui?
=
* http://benham.net/index.html *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- --
--- * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- ---*
*Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 *
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++> P+++$ L++>*
* * E? W+++$ N+(-) o? K- w+++$(--) O M-- V- PS-- *
* Debian Develop
ng. The
Yes. I saw my mistake as I was reading and rereading the constituion. But
since nobody commented on the thread, I just let the matter drop instead of
correcting my assuptions to the list.
=========
* http://benham.net/index.html *
* ---
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
=
* http://benham.net/index.html *
* * -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- --
How about ship Hamm with 2.0.33 as setup but include what's necessary for
2.0.34 the way Bo has 2.0.29 but includes the stuff for 2.0.30
--
http://benham.net/index.html
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++> P+++$ L++> E?
52 matches
Mail list logo
