On 05/07/19 09:02, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Jul 2019 at 01:07:59 +1200, Daniel Reurich wrote:
>> Our packaging approach is more or less "unapplied" for 3.0(quilt)
>> packages, and (I think) pretty much universally using quilt and gbp -
>> only for changel
ds some light and information into the mix.
-- Note:
I'm interested in where this discussion is going and will attempt to
follow it to it's conclusion. However I'm infrequently looking at
debian-devel posts, so if anyone wants to specifically bring my
attention to pertinent details in this thread, or wants a more
synchronous response, feel free to CC me.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel Reurich
Centurion Computer Technology (2005) Ltd.
021 797 722
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 02/02/16 18:18, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Daniel Reurich (2016-02-02 00:46:28)
>> On 02/02/16 12:36, Bill Allombert wrote:
>>> We have just released Debian Policy 3.9.7.0 to fix a FTBFS.
>
> Thanks a lot for all the work on maintaining Debian Policy!
>
r which requires network access to
build the image (may also be true of cdimage, live-installer etc) fails
on this policy??
(I found out the hard way when trying to build d-i for devuan in jenkins
using pbuilder which by default doesn't allow internet access from the
buildenvironment.)
Regar
binGI0yE8ajA8.bin
Description: PGP/MIME version identification
encrypted.asc
Description: OpenPGP encrypted message
p the modes file for those display's resolutions. (For extra
info on the display, you can parse the edid file with parse-edid from
the readedid package as well) As far as I can tell the displays
Native|best resolution in the modes file is always the first line.
--
Daniel Reurich
Centurion Computer Technology (2005) Ltd.
021 797 722
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
these massive changes.
>
> And again, this is not related to supporting a merged /usr scheme.
>
That doesn't make sense given the subject you started this whole thread
with...
--
Daniel Reurich
Centurion Computer Technology (2005) Ltd.
021 797 722
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
o btrfs and filesystem versioning to support easy rollbacks? For that
you'd need to keep everything except /home and /srv to be able to easily
and consistently roll back to a particular state.
TBH the only argument I've heard so far that holds some water is the nfs
shared /usr and even
On 03/01/16 22:33, Philip Hands wrote:
> Daniel Reurich writes:
>
> ...
>> Because systemd doesn't work without /usr on the root partition isn't a
>> good reason either.
>
> You are right ... it is a poor reason, because it is pure fantasy.
Then why is it t
ficial for some or indeed many use cases.
What I'd like to know is what are the real use cases where a merged /usr
is absolutely required (- where it isn't the result of a lazy and
unprofessional attitude of dis-respecting the environment that exists
and ignorance of the hard learne
are that the source
code referenced by the that is what is in the specified distro
archive, under the specified version number.
"archive" is rather indescript and confusing too.
Why not use {quilt,native,gitsrc...}/{debian,ubuntu,devuan}/
thus tying it to the source format.
--
Daniel Reurich
rnatively we could ask the user what
mua they use (provide a list out of the installed mua's) - and use that.
--
Daniel Reurich.
Centurion Computer Technology (2005) Ltd
Mobile 021 797 722
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
12 matches
Mail list logo
