Re: cdrtools

2006-08-10 Thread Dale C. Scheetz
On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 15:44:57 +0200 Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Stuff deleted for brevity > > > All of this, without even taking into account your brain-dead > > licensing mix between CDDL and GPL - which are intentionally > > incompatible licenses, according to Sun guys. > > If yo

Re: Successful and unsuccessful Debian development tools

2006-08-01 Thread Dale C. Scheetz
Stuff deleted > > I have cdebootstrap do create chroots, dchroot to use them, > buildd/sbuild to test compile under true buildd conditions. Why would > I want something else? > I'm not sure I know, but now that I know about this pair, I will certainly look into it. After that, if I can answer yo

Re: Ongoing Firefox (and Thunderbird) Trademark problems

2005-06-18 Thread Dale C. Scheetz
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 02:16:18 -0400 Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Marco d'Itri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Jun 15, Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > It's an important part in evaluating the balance between the > > > > priorities of our users and free software.

Re: Is Ubuntu a debian derivative or is it a fork?

2005-06-04 Thread Dale C. Scheetz
On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 19:16:50 +0200 Daniel Holbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Dale, > > Am Samstag, den 04.06.2005, 11:29 -0400 schrieb Dale C. Scheetz: > > >From the first CD I installed, I realized it was a fork...and a > > >disapointing > >

Re: Is Ubuntu a debian derivative or is it a fork?

2005-06-04 Thread Dale C. Scheetz
On Thu, 2 Jun 2005 00:25:01 -0400 Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (To answer the thread leader, I consider Ubuntu to be more and more of a > fork and less and less a derivative distribution. If Ubuntu doesn't > start to re-converge with Debian significantly after sarge is released, > and w

Re: More on icons for packages

2005-01-27 Thread Dale C. Scheetz
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:52:48 +0100 Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 20:18:39 -0500 > "Dale C. Scheetz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Thus it might be even better to define a policy the following way: > > > &g

Re: More on icons for packages

2005-01-26 Thread Dale C. Scheetz
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 08:15:38 +0100 (CET) Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Dale C. Scheetz wrote: > > > It might be better to reserve /usr/share/pixmaps specifically for menu > > icons in xpm format and create /usr/share/icons for png gif

Re: More on icons for packages

2005-01-25 Thread Dale C. Scheetz
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 23:24:45 -0600 Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (va, manoj)> wrote: > On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:35:42 -0500, Dale C Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: > > > This document is only indirectly referenced in the policy manual, so > > it isn't

Re: More on icons for packages

2005-01-23 Thread Dale C. Scheetz
aintenance but... Thanks for the feedback. Any pointers to other docs would be useful... Luck, Dwarf On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:20:44 +0100 Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 07:35:42PM -0500, Dale C. Scheetz wrote: > > Well, I finally found some docum

More on icons for packages

2005-01-23 Thread Dale C. Scheetz
Well, I finally found some documentation on icons in menu specifications. What it says is pretty specific and goes against what I found when I looked at actual packages. 1. the documentation says all icons go into /usr/share/pixmaps and 2. all menu icons should be 32x32 pixels and be in xpm forma

Adding Icons to Spider

2005-01-19 Thread Dale C. Scheetz
I have recently created an icon for the spider program and I have several implimentation questions. 1. Am I permitted to place an icon in /usr/share/pixmaps? What is the practice with subdirectories under pixmaps? (I did RTFM so if I just missed it please give me a reference) 2. When you add some