Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-01
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the xmlto package.
I posted recently about orphaning it on -devel and got a few
answers but nobody adopted it yet. I consider this package important for
debian but feel that I lack sgml and TeX knowl
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 03:34:32PM -0700, Michael Cardenas wrote:
> You will need xfs-xtt to view this font properly.
This is plain wrong. Since XFree86 4.0 we don't need xfs-xtt to use a
True-Type font.
Please don't put this sentence in your description.
Christophe
--
Chr
://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=140268&repeatmerged=yes
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Christophe Barbé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GnuPG FingerPrint: E0F6 FADF 2A5C F
MUs for pencam and libgpio are in
> incoming, dinstall will pick them up in a couple of hours.
>
> After this, we should be done with this problem.
>
> JB.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
2.4.19-1 fix the problem.
Christophe
--
Christophe Barbé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GnuPG FingerPrint: E0F6 FADF 2A5C F072 6AF8 F67A 8F45 2F1E D72C B41E
Ce que l'on conçoit bien s'énonce clairement,
Et les mots pour le dire arrivent aisément.
Nicolas Boileau, L'Art poétiqu
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Christophe Barbé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GnuPG FingerPrint: E0F6 FADF 2A5C F072 6AF8 F67A 8F45 2F1E D72C B41E
Ce que l'on conçoit bien s'énonce clair
Ok that is it.
I have increased the limit size of spamc (with -s) and the message got a
nice :
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=16.3 required=5.0
tests=FROM_MALFORMED,FROM_NO_USER,BADTRANS_WORM,MISSING_HEADERS version=2.11
Christophe
--
Christophe Barbé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GnuPG FingerPrint
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 08:07:10PM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 06:52:10PM -0400, christophe barbé wrote:
> > I got a mail with sample.exe (2.4MB) attachment. This mail has not been
> > scanned by spamassassin. I don't understand why. I use a procma
sage-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bcc:
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 18:40:16 -0400
I don't even know how a mail like this can be accepted by a MTA.
Any Idea ?
Christophe
--
Christophe Barbé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GnuPG FingerPrint: E0F6 FADF 2A5C F072 6AF8 F67A 8F45 2F1E D72C B41E
y signed by a dd ?
David : I understand that you are certainly the old and the new David
but we can not be sure and I am wondering if we have a security flaw
here. There is nothing personal, I hope your new key will be signed
soon. And this give me a good reason to check that my key is safe in
t
notified)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] which is the address you need to mail for
> things like this.
>
> --
> "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
--
Christophe Barbé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GnuPG FingerPrint: E0F6 FADF 2A5C F072 6AF8 F67A 8F45
andidates. However, they still do not make it into Woody.
>
> I believe we (maintainers depending on libusb) all have the same
> problem : we all need these packages in the release, for some reason
> or another.
>
> Aj, could you please have a look at this issue ?
>
> Than
umented
> both accurately and publicly to ensure a proper traceback can be made.
Is your new key signed by a dd after a face to face ID check ?
If No, I believe you need that.
Christophe
--
Christophe Barbé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GnuPG FingerPrint: E0F6 FADF 2A5C F072 6AF8 F67A 8F45 2F1E
-key owner) are you (the
old-key owner).
As I understand it, this kind of "chain of establishment" can only work
if you sign your new key with your old one. But IIUC you lost your old
private key.
I may be wrong,
Christophe
--
Christophe Barbé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GnuPG FingerP
ibusb-dependent
> packages will enter Woody next week (around wednesday, sane-frontends
> needs another 2 or 3 days from now on).
>
> Hopefully.
>
> Thanks to Julien LEMOINE for his help on SANE.
>
> JB.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on all architectures and free
> of release critical bugs for this to happen.
>
> Cheers,
> aj
>
> --
> Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
>
> ``Debian: gi
16 matches
Mail list logo
