Re: Soren Stoutner
> I thought about doing that, but those who are against this change feel so
> strongly about
> their position I don’t think they would accept a change made that way as
> valid. In
> addition, such a change doesn’t just need to apply to the mailing lists, but
> also to other
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: libpgj...@packages.debian.org, libscram-j...@packages.debian.org,
libstringprep-j...@packages.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, Debian
Java Maintainers , Debian
PostgreSQL Maintainers
Control: affects -1 + src:libpgjava
I request assistance
Re: Simon Richter
> That is not a 32 bit bug, but an indication of something else being broken.
It is the same problem in the sense that 64-bit architectures are
fine, and something (probably in some autoconf script) is broken on
32-bit. The point here is that these are always weird bugs in weird
Re: To debian-devel
> it has probably been a decade since I've last seen a PostgreSQL
> installation in the wild on a 32-bit machine. PostgreSQL itself works
> fine there, but more and more extensions are not compatible anymore,
> either deliberately, or (more common) because of subtle bugs in prin
Hi debian-devel,
it has probably been a decade since I've last seen a PostgreSQL
installation in the wild on a 32-bit machine. PostgreSQL itself works
fine there, but more and more extensions are not compatible anymore,
either deliberately, or (more common) because of subtle bugs in printf
pattern
Re: Steve Langasek
> Christoph Berg
>postgresql-16 (U)
Please do not upload postgresql-16 before I ack the diff.
I'll also note that *ALL* nmu diffs I've seen so far are using the
wrong version number in debian/changelog, missing the "~exp1" upload
from the actual
Re: Helmut Grohne
> Is it ok to call upgrade scenarios failures that cannot be reproduced
> using apt unsupported until we no longer deal with aliasing?
>
> If the answer is yes here, we'll close #1058937 (Ben's libnfsidmap1 bug)
> with no action calling the scenario unsupported.
I think we shoul
Re: Domenico Andreoli
> fatal: Unable to create
> '/srv/scratch/qa.debian.org/vcswatch/g/golang-github-flowstack-go-jsonschema/shallow.lock':
> No space left on device
>
> Some machine needs maintenance due to a full disk.
Hi,
adsb added more space to the partition, and I triggered a re-run
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, Debian PostgreSQL Maintainers
Control: affects -1 src:slony1-2
I request assistance with maintaining the slony1-2 package.
The package is in maintenance mode upstream with very little activity,
but the Debian integratio
Hi,
You want either debuginfod or debian-debug, see
https://wiki.debian.org/HowToGetABacktrace.
Re: Sergio Durigan Junior
> I would like to announce a new service that I have just configured for
> Debian: https://debuginfod.debian.net.
Very cool!
> Currently, the elfutils and GDB packages in unstable and testing have
> native support for using debuginfod. I will soon propose a change to
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christoph Berg
* Package name: js8call
Version : 2.0.1
* URL : http://js8call.com/
* License : GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
Programming Lang: C++, Fortran
Description : Amateur Radio Digital Mode providing weak
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request help with maintaining the pgq family of packages. They
implement a queuing mechanism on top of PostgreSQL, but I'm not using
them myself.
Packages are:
pgq
pgqd
pgq-node
python-pgq
python-skytools
Previously, this was a single package, skytools3, but upst
Re: Enrico Zini 2017-09-05 <20170905163334.2mi5tzacykzja...@enricozini.org>
> I should have managed to do it, but chrome still doesn't seem to like
> it. Can you generate a new certificate and see if you still find
> differences?
"openssl x509 -text -noout" doesn't show any differences anymore
exc
Re: Enrico Zini 2017-09-05 <20170905093701.xncmprl2x4so6...@enricozini.org>
> I refactored the certificate generation code for sso.debian.org, and the
> certificates it generates now still work in Firefox but not in Chrome.
My guess is that the new-style certificates are missing some
attributes:
Re: Ondrej Novy 2017-04-16
> Hi,
>
> 2017-04-16 15:08 GMT+02:00 Peter Palfrader :
> >
> > Having the DBMS on a different host should be a supported way of setup.
> > You should not depend on a postgres server on the same machine running
> > gitlab, and therefore neither should you pre-depend on
Re: Luca Falavigna 2015-06-13
> Would it be also possible to exclude from the view packages no longer
> maintained in the selected suites (see #736715) ?
That'd be more involved change. We used to only look at
unstable/experimental to gather maintainer information. The problem
with that is if a
Hi,
over the past days, DDPO grew the ability to also show oldoldstable
(aka squeeze) versions, mostly for the benefit of those working on
squeeze-lts.
To use, append &version=oldoldstable to your DDPO URL, or set it via
the usual display configuration dialog at the bottom of the page.
https://q
Re: Axel Beckert 2015-02-20 <20150220221043.gh3...@sym.noone.org>
> > > Just FYI. Guido Gunther has done something similar with whatmaps
> > >
> > > https://honk.sigxcpu.org/piki/projects/whatmaps
> >
> > I count at least 6 implementations of the concept now:
> >
> > checkrestart (from debian-goo
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The phppgadmin package is in need of someone maintaining it who's
actually using it as well.
Outstanding issues are the apache 2.4 transition (my objections
against the original patch are mostly irrelevant now), and most
probably some general QA on the package. It s
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request assistance with maintaining the pgpool2 package in the
PostgreSQL team. I'm not using the package myself - someone with more
experience in actually running pgpool2 would be welcome to take care
of getting the more advanced features (e.g. memcached support)
Re: Adam D. Barratt 2014-09-25
<3653b875c93fd474b8b354b4c76f4...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
> On 2014-09-25 8:16, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >Or should my next upload
> >to unstable by 2.2.5-8? Or do I just ignore the version numbers I
> >uploaded to experimental and use 2.2.5-6 as the next version
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi,
pgadmin3 is maintained in the PostgreSQL team, but we aren't using the
package ourselves, so it is getting less love than ideally. We would
be glad if someone would step in for co-maintaining it. [*]
Currently there is a crash to be resolved, likely due to the
Hi,
I am maintaining too many PostgreSQL packages, and I keep forgetting
which package has changes committed that have not yet been uploaded.
To fix that, there's now a service running at qa.debian.org which
grabs the Sources files from unstable and experimental, notes all
Vcs-* URLs, makes check
Hi,
I've just uploaded postgresql-9.3 which includes a fix for a very old
bug: #314427.
For compatibility reasons long forgotten, we have been shipping some
"server" include files in libpq-dev in /usr/include/postgresql/ that
should rather only live in /usr/include/postgresql/9.3/server/. These
a
Re: Paul Wise 2013-09-20
> The format doesn't appear to be very efficient, the plain SQL commands
> are much smaller:
>
> pabs@wagner:~$ pg_restore -l postbooks_empty-4.1.0.backup > foo.sql
> pabs@wagner:~$ ls -Ssh
> total 5.6M
> 5.3M postbooks_empty-4.1.0.backup 344K foo.sql
pg_restore -l wil
Re: Neil McGovern 2013-06-17 <20130617111457.gg22...@halon.org.uk>
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 04:32:47PM +0530, Praveen A wrote:
> > Many were curious on diaspora about the change[1]. There is no
> > rationale given in release news[2] about this change. Was there some
> > major change in this releas
Nod. We do have some weirdness there. The schema is that packages built from
postgresql itself use postgresql-*-x.y (mostly), and all others use
postgresql-x.y-*. Arguably, that's confusing.
I have some plan in the back of my brain that extension modules should ship .so
files for all postgresql
Fwiw, I'm not saying packages must not use the postgresql namespace, I'd just
leave it to the maintainer to decide.
Martin Pitt schrieb:
Hello Ansgar, Christoph,
Christoph Berg [2012-08-01 21:12 +0200]:
> The various postgresql-* packages are mostly plugins (PL/something)
Righ
I usually prefer packages to use the upstream name so they are easy to find
(think other distributions).
The various postgresql-* packages are mostly plugins (PL/something) which
follow the example of postgresql-plperl-x.y (built from PG core). For real
applications like barman, that's not real
Re: Bernd Zeimetz 2010-06-30 <4c2b6f9b.8030...@bzed.de>
> > I have another question: backports-user is quite high traffic, but to upload
> > backports it is required to be subscribed. Will this change for
> > backports.debian.org? Will the users be invited to use the BTS?
>
> 80 messages in a mont
Re: Joachim Breitner 2010-06-14 <1276516697.2751.7.ca...@kirk>
> > at the moment, the Debian installer creates a /etc/hosts file
> > containing the local host name¹, so that this name is resolvable even
> > if not registered in the DNS. Unfortunately, this is a possible cause
> > of problems when t
Re: Peter S Galbraith 2010-06-07 <12003.1275931...@mixed>
> I maintain the debian directory in the upstream sources of a package
> (gri) that uses auto-tools. So far, it seems to need the files:
>
> debian/source/Makefile.am
> debian/source/Makefile.in
Something like
EXTRA_DIST = $(wildcard
Re: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort 2010-01-18 <4b5446ba.7070...@debian.org>
> >I am worried if perhaps Paul Dwerryhouse is
> >Missing In Action.
>
> Have you tried to contact him directly? If not, try to do so, and if
> he doesn't answer in some time, notify the MIA team.
Btw, it is considered good styl
Re: Pierre Habouzit 2008-10-30 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 04:52:58PM +, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > Re: Pierre Habouzit 2008-10-30 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Anyways, the information is: I don't intend to maintain or run bts-link
> > &g
Re: Pierre Habouzit 2008-10-30 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Anyways, the information is: I don't intend to maintain or run bts-link
> anymore[2], it is up for adoption. If the BTS people wish to inherit the
> beast they come first, but any motivated group of people are welcomed.
If the BTS folks don't wa
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Following this afternoon's discussion on #debian-devel, I'm filing
this RFH bug to note that Ron, the wxwidgets2.6 maintainer, does
encourage people wanting to actively work on getting 2.8 into Debian
to do so.
Bear in mind that there are lots of open issues that sh
tags 438712 + wontfix
thanks
Hi Christian,
Cc'ing -devel since I don't think there is a consensus about this
issue.
Re: Christian Perrier 2007-08-19 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> This package's description mentions the upstream project web page. I suggest
> it uses the de facto standard of mentioning it
Re: Steinar H. Gunderson 2007-07-19 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 09:02:02AM -0700, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> > Description : Parallel versions of the OpenSSH tools
>
> What exactly does this mean? What is the software good for?
And what does it do differently from the followi
Re: Peter Holm 2007-06-18 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> b) Why do you state an invalid adress for the maintainer, even if the
> program is in the testing branch?
That's what listed in the package.
As it looks, Adrian's packages should probably all be orphaned, the
address has been bouncing since at lea
Hi,
316 + 0,9K Jun 10 22:32 Debian Installe cb+myon=de
postpone_0.1_amd64.changes is NEW
320 + 0,4K Jun 11 12:30 Debian Installe cb+myon=de
postpone_0.1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED
looks like postpone got fast-tracked in the NEW queue (thanks Joerg!),
so here's what I posted in my blog yesterd
Re: Stefano Zacchiroli 2007-04-02 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I share the feeling of "niceness" of the personal touch, but this isn't
> a technical reason, and the point of uniforming a timezone so that it's
> easier to compare dates among different changelog is definitely a valid
> one.
If we want to (
Re: Robert Millan 2007-04-02 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Since dates written to changelogs are going to be read by people all over
> > > the
> > > world, IMHO it is better if these dates are in UTC to make it easier to
> > > figure out when it was uploaded in comparison to other events (such as the
Re: Russ Allbery 2007-01-06 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> This is what I'd do. Yes, it's a bunch of extra packages, but it clearly
> expresses the actual dependency structure, rather than an approximation of
> it, and that's usually a good thing in the long run.
As a very late follow up, here's what the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: dds
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Bo Haglund et al.
Section : games
* URL : http://web.telia.com/~u88910365/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The 'gv' package deserves more care than I did spend on it since I
adopted it. It should be in a reasonable shape, but the BTS needs a
thorough cleanup and there's a bunch of patches that should be synced
with/forwarded to upstream. I'd be glad to hand it over to som
Re: Pierre Habouzit 2007-01-08 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > The perl team, on the other hand, uses the different scheme:
> > Maintainer: "main responsible person for the package"
> > Uploaders: the team mailing list, + members who actually care for the
> > package (who have touched it in the past,
Re: Mike Hommey 2007-01-05 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Then remove the libc6 parts and use
^^
> > Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${mysql:Depends} | ${postgres:Depends} |
> > ${sqlite:Depends}
... and make sure there's only one package left.
> Not exactly what you'd like...
Re: Andreas Metzler 2007-01-05 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Which does not seem to be properly translateable into a valid single
> fasel|(foo | bar, blah) Depends relation[1].
It won't work if a plugin needs more than one dependency, right.
> You could move the plugin's additional dependencies into Rec
Re: Mattia Dongili 2007-01-05 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Is it in this case ok if I replace ',' by '|' there? This would allow
> > the user to really choose what database backend he wants.
>
> Yes, why not? does yada handles gracefully the absence of a library (eg.
> if incorrectly configured or such
Re: Kurt Roeckx 2007-01-05 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > | Depends: [...], libmysqlclient15off (>= 5.0.24-2), libpq4 (>= 8.1.4),
> > libsqlite3-0 (>= 3.3.8)
>
> >From the subject, I seem to understand that those are added by shlibs?
> This seems to suggest that something in the package is linked to all
Re: Hendrik Sattler 2007-01-05 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The thought should not be how many files are in each package but what the
> average client saves by not pulling all dependency chains.
Just tried installing in pbuilder:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# apt-get install libmysqlclient15off
The following NE
Re: Mike Hommey 2007-01-05 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> How good does it support it when its plugins can't load, which is going
> to happen if you load, for example, the mysql plugin and don't have the
> libmysqlclient installed ?
Yada returns ENOENT like it does if the user specifies a non-existant
plug
Hi,
I'm packaging a database wrapper library (http://oss.devit.com/yada/).
Its purpose is to provide one single API to a program and let the user
configure if the database used is actually postgres/mysql/sqlite. The
actual interfacing with the databases is done by .so plugins that are
dlopened at
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: retty
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Petr Baudis, Jan Sembera
* URL : http://pasky.or.cz/~pasky/dev/retty/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C and i386 asm (it d
Re: Eike Nicklas 2006-10-26 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> So I think it is about time to send a big THANK YOU to ALL of you who
> created this great distribution. Debian was the first distribution that
> persuaded me of the advantages of linux and of free software and by now,
> it has been my favourite ope
Re: Andreas Metzler 2006-10-13 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> packages.debian.org is lagging almost a whole day (bug #335011), you
> should use madison on merkel or "apt-cache show" on a up to date sid
> system to check the available version.
'rmadison' in the devscripts package queries the database remote
Re: Raúl Sánchez Siles 2006-10-06 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I don't think this bug could only be considered as a minor bug, since it
> prevented me to enter into kde and once you are used to apps inside a
> graphical environmnet it's quite difficult to find a solution yourself.
Do you have an idea w
Re: Andreas Tille 2006-09-27 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The hint to non US keyboard is *very* important. I would love if
> *every* string a user (not a hacker) has to type at the boot prompt
> would work on *any* keybord according to its marking, which means only
> letters (no =_/ etc.) are allowed.
G
Re: Steve Langasek 2006-09-26 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > What I would expect at least:
> > Rename the task from "Desktop" to "Desktop (Gnome)" so more experienced
> > users know what's coming up.
>
> Should we also have "Mail Server (exim4)" and "Mail Server (postfix)" for
> the same reason?
Sarge'
Re: Esteban Manchado Velázquez 2006-09-25 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I have even rewritten dhelp_parse, one of the main utilities, in Ruby [4]
> (mostly because it's a huge PITA finding and fixing bugs in a largely text
> processing program... written in C). It maintains compatibility with the
> doc
Re: Christian Aichinger 2006-09-25 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> As a start, I've written a script that searches for unnecessary
> dependencies and reports them. Results are available here:
> http://rerun.lefant.net/checklib
DDPO (aka developer.php) has a link to the list of checklib results
per maintaine
[sending manually, the cron mail got stuck somewhere]
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 309 (new: 20)
Total number of packages offered up for
Re: Andreas Tille 2006-09-19 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The situation you described qualifies for a group maintained upload.
> You might keep the original maintainer in the Uploaders field for the
> sake of politeness because a complete hijack is regarded rude (even
> if the facts you describe would jus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Re: Ron Johnson 2006-09-14 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 09/13/06 20:15, Adam Cecile wrote:
> [snip]
> > It includes the following features :
> [snip]
> >- Can handle files up to 2Gb.
>
> That's a feature?
No, a bug (or rather, doesn't meet a release
Re: martin f krafft 2006-09-08 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Please see #385957, and the discussion between Julian and myself.
>
> Basically, we thought about two solutions, and I came up with
> a third one last night.
>
> 1. Julian proposes to simply to encode the information about a BSP
> into t
st of
companies who do so, though:
http://www.debian.org/consultants/
Please refer to them.
(On a sidenote, Linux ES is a Redhat product, you might want to check
www.redhat.com.)
Yours, Christoph Berg
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
Re: Nacho Barrientos Arias 2006-07-29 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> What could be the best section for this package? 'admin' like
> "john" (pdfcrack has got a similar behaviour) or 'utils'?
Cracking pdfs is not something an admin would usually do.
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
Re: Tatsuya Kinoshita 2006-07-29 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Should `pinentry' and `pinentry-x11' be added to the list of
> virtual package names?
>
> I've discovered that the virtual package `pinentry' is provided by
> pinentry-curses, pinentry-gtk, pinentry-gtk2 and pinentry-qt, and
> the virtual pack
Re: José Luis Tallón 2006-07-25 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> This is mostly to let ftpmasters know that he has indeed agreed to
> these terms so that the upload won't be rejected.
> Jon, just give an ACK on-list and that should be it.
Unless you are building new binaries, your upload won't be NEW
Re: Britton Kerin 2006-07-23 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Is there any reasonable hope of getting my account reinstated?
debian-keyring.gpg:
pub 1024D/E3A0213C 2000-07-26
uid Britton Leo Kerin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
uid Britton Leo Kerin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sub 1024g/D0
Hi,
please try asking on the debian-user-german list; this list is not
meant for user questions.
Re: Yura 2006-07-23 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I started pppoeconf but the system at once searches a modem and does not
> find.
> Is it needed how to connect a network modem (service), using pppd?
> My pr
Re: Marco d'Itri 2006-07-22 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Instead of moving libpcre and making it quasi-essential, why not
> > slightly modify grep so that it can dlopen libpcre if present. Not
> Since grep is already modular this would be very easy to implement by
> moving the Pcompile() and Pexecute()
Re: Frank Küster 2006-07-21 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I believe that we need to rephrase the TeX Policy. But this requires
> not just to specifiy that each "cfg" file must be in /etc. Instead, I
> think we need to find a distinction between
>
> - files that can be used to modify the behavior of prog
Re: Wouter Verhelst 2006-07-18 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On the contrary people who want to have the "derivatives" keyword on all
> > their subscriptions can use one of those commands:
> > keywordall + derivatives
> > keywordall [EMAIL PROTECTED] + derivatives
>
> This is so cool that I immediately
Re: Steve Langasek 2006-06-10 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Is it no longer a requirement of NM that applicants demonstrate themselves
> capable of putting together a source package without the use of rules
> helpers?
Not in that length. The template question used by most AMs is:
Write a small shell sc
Re: martin f krafft 2006-06-09 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> also sprach Jean Parpaillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.09.1118 +0200]:
> > I want to migrate my package (wormux) to CDBS.
>
> Why?
I was just about to ask the same. Which packaging scheme do you use
now?
> This is my opinion and others will
Re: Erik Steffl 2006-05-21 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> is drupal debian package effectively orphaned? It is already two
> major upgrades (more than a year) behind upstream (and upstream
> recommends to upgrade from one version to next so the upgrades to
> current might get complicated).
No, please
ave files in (/usr)/bin.
> sdate Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bogus. (sdate is a fakeroot fork and needs a .so in /usr/lib/ for
technical reasons.)
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
Re: Kevin B. McCarty 2006-05-17 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> In case anyone is interested in filing mass bug reports (I am not
> sufficiently interested, sorry), here are the -dev packages in
> unexpected sections, obtained as follows:
Isn't that more a matter of updating the override files?
Christoph
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-03 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It seems the gnokii package is unmaintained and its maintainer doesn't do
> anything.
> Should the package be orphaned so other interested developers can take it?
It is already orphaned (with a pending ITA). Please so some research
before pos
Re: Joey Hess 2006-05-03 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I won't discuss here the goodwill of this change, I just want to
> > point out that by now, 110 packages are RC bug candidates because of
> > this [2] (422 files installed inder `/usr/lib/cgi-bin').
>
> Policy uses a "should" for this, so at most th
Hi,
Re: Pierre Habouzit 2006-05-03 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * as of tags, it only touches (like I explained) :
>- upstream: ensure it's always set
>- wontfix: try to guess if upstream tagged that bug wontfix, and
>set/unset it accordingly
>- fixed-upstream:
>
Re: Jason D. Clinton 2006-04-28 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> In short, your key is gone and with the current long delays in getting new
> keys added to the keyring, that's a big problem. You can't recover a GPG
> password.
If you had read the keyring.d.o changelog you would have seen that
these long de
Re: To debian-devel@lists.debian.org 2006-04-26 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [*] Though I don't think "we" ever said Manoj's wish to rename the
> package was unethical - "we" just think that it confuses users more
> than it serves them. But as said, that's up to the maintainer to
> decide.
Hrm, I missed
Re: Russ Allbery 2006-04-26 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Must we decide on a policy? Can't Manoj just package gnus-dfsg and
> > be done with it? Is that really such a big problem?
>
> > I think not.
>
> Amen.
>
> I can understand people disagreeing with Manoj's choice, but am completely
> mystified b
Re: Oleksandr Moskalenko 2006-04-18 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I wonder if anyone has knowledge of the whereabouts of Jose Luis Tallon as far
> as his Debian involvement is concerned. His packages have several RC bugs,
> have not been updated for while, and some of them have been NMUed a while ago.
Hi
Re: Olaf van der Spek 2006-04-19 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Does anyone know whether Philipp Matthias Hahn is MIA?
Hi,
please Cc: the person in question when asking about MIAness. At the
same time, Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] to make sure the MIA tracking team is
aware, we might miss your message on -de
Re: Felipe Sateler 2006-04-14 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Shouldn't package maintainers close these bugs when they have
> received help?
Yes, definitely. If you are aware of any "solved" RFH bugs, could you
ping the maintainers?
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Des
Re: Andreas Metzler 2006-04-09 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I'm not aware of any package inserting its system users into
> > /etc/aliases, and in fact, my sid chroot doesn't even have that file.
>
> They shouldn't, unless they want to receive mail for the system-user
> account.
If they _don't_ want to
Re: Andreas Metzler 2006-04-09 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> #1 sane packages redirect mail via /etc/aliases
> #2 un-aliased mail to systemusers (e.g. spam) is not accepted and
> dumped into /var/mail/systemuser but rejected immediately (at SMTP
> time).
I'm not aware of any package inserting its system u
Re: Adrian von Bidder 2006-04-06 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> QA/MIA people: are you reading this (below)? Or Thomas - perhaps you have
> time to dropa a quick note yourself?
We are reading -qa, yes. (And -devel, but things are harder to spot
there.)
You could have checked the pinging going on current
Re: Erast Benson 2006-04-06 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Attached is the first in the series of dpkg patches which adds
> solaris-i386 architecture support used by NexentaOS.
>
> We would like to start submitting patchsets for core packages like dpkg,
> apt, debhelper, coreutils, gcc, xorg, and many othe
Re: Michael Martinez 2006-03-29 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Might want to consider adding the following patch to the distribution:
>
> http://atftplocalnet.sourceforge.net/
>
> I wrote an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] don't know if that's the right
> email for him.
The right place for requests concernin
Re: Luca Capello 2006-03-28 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Please correct me if I'm wrong :-)
That's what I intended to say, sorry if I made the impression of
contradicting you. The point was that some people new to packaging
seem to think that they don't have to include the full license, and if
the licens
Re: Luca Capello 2006-03-28 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Just to be sure, is the following enough for the BSD license?
>
> This software is licensed under the terms of the BSD license,
> which can be found on Debian systems in the file
> /usr/share/common-licenses/BSD or from
> http://www.opensource.
Re: Bill Allombert 2006-03-28 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Please always keep the full Debian changelog information in the package.
> Of course, you can move very old changelog entry to changelog.old or
> changelog.1 if they cause problems, but ship them in the deb.
Please don't even do that, the changel
Re: Benjamin Mesing 2006-03-27 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> You can download the package from
> http://www.mesing.de/packagesearch/packagesearch_2.1_i386.deb
> and a pgp signature from:
> http://www.mesing.de/packagesearch/packagesearch_2.1_i386.deb.sig
Usually people want the source package here. I see
Re: Raphael Hertzog 2006-03-26 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Each package with translations has several dozens of copyright holder,
> we don't have to keep that list in the copyright file, do we ?
And we ignore any (C) FSF in generated autofoo stuff.
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
Re: Steve M. Robbins 2006-03-25 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Wouldn't it be nice if you could simply "sudo apt-get install "
> yourself? Is it feasible to have at least some of the sid chroots
> allow this? Alternatively, how about "sudo pbuilder login ..."?
I was ranting about that on irc before,
1 - 100 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
