Bug#813443: ITP: libneo4j-client -- Client library and shell for Neo4j

2016-02-01 Thread Chris Leishman
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Chris Leishman * Package name: libneo4j-client Version : 0.7.1 Upstream Author : Chris Leishman * URL : https://cleishm.github.io/libneo4j-client/ * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: C Description : Client

Re: security in testing

2003-05-14 Thread Chris Leishman
On Thursday, May 15, 2003, at 12:42 AM, Matt Zimmerman wrote: The idea being discussed, as I understand it, is to have fewer security vulnerabilities in 'testing'. The only sane way to accomplish this is to fix the bugs. There has been a disproportionate amount of strategizing around this simpl

Re: security in testing

2003-05-14 Thread Chris Leishman
On Thursday, May 15, 2003, at 12:36 AM, Matt Zimmerman wrote: Removing a package from the archive is not very useful as a security measure. Most users who want the package will already have it installed, and it is those users who are most exposed. It's not unusual for a vulnerability to exist f

Re: security in testing

2003-05-14 Thread Chris Leishman
On Wednesday, May 14, 2003, at 10:57 PM, Michael Stone wrote: That assumption is both false and absurd. Testing has exactly two advantages over unstable--1) all dependencies are satisfied and 2) known rc bugs don't propagate to testing. In all other respects unstable is better. (Security problems

Re: security in testing

2003-05-14 Thread Chris Leishman
On Wednesday, May 14, 2003, at 10:02 PM, Matt Zimmerman wrote: There is no shortage of opinions about what "we" should do, but there is unlikely to be any action until an "I" arises who actually does the work. This has been discussed over and over with the same result each time (i.e., no action

Re: security in testing

2003-05-14 Thread Chris Leishman
On Wednesday, May 14, 2003, at 08:15 PM, Matthias Urlichs wrote: - If the build is successful, it's available for apt-getting from testing-updates; otherwise the maintainer gets a helpful ;-) email. I'm just curious why the updates couldn't just go straight into testing itself. It's not as if th

Re: security in testing

2003-05-14 Thread Chris Leishman
On Wednesday, May 14, 2003, at 06:03 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: So, I guess I'll be filing with ftp.d.o to have the vulnerable Samba package removed from testing. And I guess this was the point I was trying to suggest. I feel that if there is no other solution ready (eg. there is no fixed package

Re: security in testing

2003-05-14 Thread Chris Leishman
On Wednesday, May 14, 2003, at 11:22 AM, Anthony Towns wrote: This isn't possible in general; when mysql has a security problem you can't just tell people to (a) not use it, or (b) just run the unstable/stable version anyway, in spite of whatever reasons they based their decision to use testing on

Re: security in testing

2003-05-14 Thread Chris Leishman
On Tuesday, May 13, 2003, at 05:20 PM, Matt Zimmerman wrote: Please get this OFF of debian-private and onto -devel. Quote me anywhere. Redirected thread to debian-devel. If you want to see security updates for 'testing', then start preparing security updates for 'testing'. It does not help to de

security in testing

2003-05-14 Thread Chris Leishman
get the missing package back into testing. Obviously there needs to be some more thought put into exactly how the withdrawal/replacement of packages occurs, and I think others out there will have a better idea of how that could work than I. Regards, Chris Leishman PGP.sig Description: Binary data

Re: Package with non-free build-depends

2002-12-01 Thread Chris Leishman
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 01:09:54AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > Look, if doxygen can be configured for your packages not using dot. Or > else include a "precompiled" version of the docs into your diff > file. Adapt your rules in a way, that it can fall back to the > precompiled version, if the

Package with non-free build-depends

2002-12-01 Thread Chris Leishman
Hi all, The recently released version of libxml++ (0.16.0) includes doxygen documentation produced from the code (to html), so I created a -doc package for this. However, doxygen wanted to use "dot" to create some of the images for the documentation. Problem with that is that "dot" is from the g

Re: make mutt the `standard' mail reader

1999-01-19 Thread Chris Leishman
On Sat, Jan 16, 1999 at 10:26:06PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > On Sat, Jan 16, 1999 at 02:36:47AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 16, 1999 at 06:10:09PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > > Well, maybe. I find config menus to be infuriating. elm's config files > > > don't seem to hav

Re: something is f***ed

1998-10-18 Thread Chris Leishman
On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 06:07:17PM -0500, Stephen Crowley wrote: > Ok, i just apt-get upgraded about an hour ago, to my horror i can no > longer login, nor can I su, it just sits there doing nothing. I > also cannot telnet to localhost. Someone on irc just upgraded also and got > the exact same pro

Bug with xv?

1998-10-16 Thread Chris Leishman
Hi all, I was just working away on my machine, and using xv to display the latest results from my raytracing project. The pic came out too small, and so I went to press shift '>' to zoom it up, only I missed and hit shift '<'. Low and behold my xserver crashed. I've since tested and found that

pgp => gpg

1998-10-16 Thread Chris Leishman
Hi all, At the moment I am using pgp2i, but I would like to try and change to gnupg. My question is - will I need to generate a new public/private key, or is it possible to use my pgp one with gnupg? I would really prefer to keep my old one, as otherwise I'll have to distribute a new key, not t

shutdown and X

1998-10-14 Thread Chris Leishman
Hi, I just noticed that when my machine gets shut down cleanly, and there was an open X session (which gets terminated), the words "crash" get inserted into the wtmp, utmp or lastlog (whichever last uses) instead of the normal log out time. Does anyone else experience this? Is it a bug or a 'f

Re: Ropes in stl (was Re: lack of wstring in libstdc++2.8-dev)

1998-10-12 Thread Chris Leishman
On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 08:24:49AM +0100, M.C. Vernon wrote: > > > void main(void) > > > > BTW, main returns int, not void. See the comp.lang.c FAQ for the bit of > the C standard that defines this - main is incorrectly said to return void > in a number of texts though. > > HTH, > > Matthew >