Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Chow Loong Jin
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: heatshrink
Version : 0.4.1
Upstream Contact: Scott Vokes
* URL : https://github.com/atomicobject/heatshrink
* License : ISC
Programming Lang
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Chow Loong Jin
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libbgcode
Version : 0.0~git20231116.bc390aa
Upstream Contact: Vojtech Bubnik
* URL : https://github.com/prusa3d/libbgcode
* License : AGPL-3.0
On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 01:54:48PM -0700, Dima Kogan wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm looking for a suggestion to fix a problem.
>
> I uploaded a package, and it cleared NEW a few days ago. I now see that
> it fails to build on most 32-bit arches becaues the compiler runs out of
> memory. Logs:
>
> https:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Chow Loong Jin
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: nanosvg
Version : 0~git20221204.1.9da543e
Upstream Contact: https://github.com/memononen/nanosvg/issues
* URL : https://github.com/memonenen/nanosvg
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Chow Loong Jin
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: logiops
Version : 0.2.2
Upstream Author : Name
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: C++
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Chow Loong Jin
* Package name: gcolor3
Version : 2.3.1
Upstream Author : Jente Hidskes
* URL : https://github.com/Hjdskes/gcolor3
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: C
Description : Simple GTK3 color selector
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 11:23:56AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> [...]
> Frankly, I don't see the point in writing this kind of software. Sbuild
> works super well with the overlay backend, and already has throw-able
> chroots in tmpfs. Adding docker into this doesn't add any new feature,
> and in
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 08:00:53AM +, Lumin wrote:
> [...]
> Your opinion?
>
> [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debmake-doc/debmake-doc.en.txt
> policy and dev-ref don't explain the Multi-Arch field.
No opinion, but the field is documented in deb-control(5), present in
the dpkg-de
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Chow Loong Jin
* Package name: slic3r-prusa
Version : 1.31.4
Upstream Author : Vojtech Bubnik
* URL : https://github.com/prusa3d/slic3r
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Perl, C++
Description : G-code generator
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Chow Loong Jin
* Package name: mediaconch
Version : 15.10
Upstream Author : MediaArea.net SARL
* URL : https://mediaarea.net/MediaConch/
* License : GPLv3+
Programming Lang: C++
Description : implementation and
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:08:35AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 11:38:06AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > > While we're on the subject of git security...should we stop
> > > recommending that non-account-holders use git:// (most efficient, but
> > > insecure against MIT
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:25:38PM +0100, Mateusz Łukasik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I make darkhttpd package and have a small issue.
>
> I prepare init script:
> https://github.com/mati75/darkhttpd/blob/master/debian/init and for run
> script with start parameter is working fine:
This is just a shot i
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 09:41:30AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach gustavo panizzo (gfa) [2014-12-16 03:29
> +0100]:
> > you can take a look what ubuntu does, on
> > /usr/lib/update-notifier/update-motd-fsck-at-reboot
> >
> > basically it runs dumpe2fs and parse the max mount count an
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 11:42:41AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> [...]
> Before we enable a firewall by default, we should, IMO, have the
> following:
>
> - A way for a user to configure it without understanding iptables.
> - A way for a user to debug (without understanding iptables) if things
>
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 09:37:48AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am starring at bug #758572. Basically OP reports that `cmake` is
> underlinked, which is a serious issue as per policy. However when
> reading the details it appears that this is a c++ weak symbol (AFAIK
> no weak defau
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Chow Loong Jin
* Package name: rhc
Version : 1.31.2
Upstream Author : Red Hat, Inc.
* URL : https://www.openshift.com
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description : OpenShift command-line tools
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Chow Loong Jin
* Package name: yagv
Version : 0.4~git20130423.r5bd15ed
Upstream Author : Jonathan Winterflood
* URL : https://github.com/jonathanwin/yagv
* License : CC-BY-3.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 02:43:16PM +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 08:57:43PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > I'd recommend that we safeguard our users against 'PHP' licensing problems
> > the same way I protect myself against a meteorite hitting me on my way to
> > work
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 08:52:24AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Chow Loong Jin
>
> > * Package name: gpx
> > Version : x.y.z
> > Upstream Author : Dr. Henry Thomas
> > * URL : https://github.com/whpthomas/GPX
> > * License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Chow Loong Jin
* Package name: gpx
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Dr. Henry Thomas
* URL : https://github.com/whpthomas/GPX
* License : GPL2+
Programming Lang: C
Description : Gcode to x3g conversion post
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 11:55:02PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Kevin Chadwick [2014-08-27 20:55 +0100]:
> > It also supports focus follows mouse, no raise on click
>
> I had forgotten, but this was the 'killer feature' that originally
> switched me to XFCE, and to a significant degree keeps me the
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 08:27:01AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Chow Loong Jin debian.org> writes:
>
> > For the record, there's CONFIG_BINFMT_SCRIPT, which when disabled, causes
> all
> > #! scripts to be run under /bin/sh unconditionally.
> >
> > *
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 11:58:17AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> [...]
> Am I understanding you correctly that you don't think there are any
> situations where compiling out features from the kernel can lead to pid1
> not working would be acceptable?
For the record, there's CONFIG_BINFMT_SCRIPT,
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 06:33:42PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi Tollef,
>
> On Thu, 03 Apr 2014, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76935
> >
> > That's being moved to systemd.debug instead of overloading debug.
>
> Good news. And please make Kay e
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 10:41:45AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi,
> [...]
> > * several kernel maintainer propose (not completely serious, but
> > it shows the general opinion), to add
> > + BUG_ON(!strcmp(current->comm, "systemd"));
>
> URLs please.
http://marc.info/?l=linux-ke
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 09:43:34AM +, Bas van den Dikkenberg wrote:
> Where do get the idea cacert uses popup's ?
>
> The only things states in RDL that user has to be informed about the
> copyright
Read the previous post, and please avoid top-posting. This post is turning out
weirdly becau
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 04:47:19AM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ben Hutchings:
> > So maybe the necessary change would be:
> > - move the pulseaudio ALSA plugins and this config file into a new
> > binary package
> > - rename the config file so it's not just an example
> > - make pul
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 09:18:51AM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
> > As an example, most users who use systemd probably still restart
> > services using "/etc/init.d/ restart", just because it works.
> >
> It's simply less to type if you don't otherwise like
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 03:09:25PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> [...]
> However, the fact that multiple DDs, which I do consider all as computer
> experts, failed to have a working setup, can only lead to the conclusion
> that there's something wrong which has to be fixed, especially if it
> come
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 01:57:00PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> [...]
> (Also, how much of it
> do I need for upstart? I could probably switch back to sysvinit,
> too – if things will work there again.)
Upstart doesn't directly make use of the LSB headers -- it just calls back onto
SysV (see /e
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:37:05AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> [...]
> Again, I don't understand why you are becoming huffy and impolite. I am
> still trying to help you and you fail to follow my instructions. You
> are not helping your case at all and you are not showing yourself
> i
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 08:33:14PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Op 05-11-13 19:52, Dominic Hamon schreef:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Dominic Hamon
> >
> > * Package name: ndt
> > Version : 3.6.5.2
> > * URL : http://www.internet2.edu/performan
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 09:07:48AM +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> > PostBooks distributes their schema as a Postgres binary dump file for
> > use with pg_restore
>
> What is their reason for using the binary format? Could they be
> convinced to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Chow Loong Jin
* Package name: abx
Version : 0.0~b1
Upstream Author : Petteri Hintsanen
* URL : http://phintsan.kapsi.fi/abx.html
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: C
Description : audio ABX testing software
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 09:20:32AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Patrick Matthäi
>
> > needrestart checks which daemons need to be restarted after library
> > upgrades.
> > It is inspired by checkrestart(1) from the debian-goodies package.
> > It does not rely on lsof as checkrestart does.
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:39:13AM +0200, olivier sallou wrote:
> hi,
> I need for a package to override some udev standard rules.
>
> If I put an identical rule name in /etc/udev/rules.d, I know it overrides
> the one in /lib/udev/rules.d
> [...]
> Is there an other way to override udev rules in
Greetings Thomas,
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:16:11PM +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> [...]
> Since it seems there is already a qr generator in Debian (qrencode), I
> suppose
> qreator has some feature that are lacking in qrencode. Could you develop
> those? That would be especially useful in
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Chow Loong Jin
* Package name: qreator
Version : 13.05.3
Upstream Author : David Planella
* URL : https://launchpad.net/qreator
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: Python
Description : utility for creating QR
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 02:51:52AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> [...]
>
> On the other hand, detecting text files is hard. The best tool so far,
> "file", makes so many errors it's useless for this purpose. One could use
> location: like, declaring stuff in /etc/ and /usr/share/doc/ to be text
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:24:15PM +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > I strongly oppose installing, by default, any userland program that
> > takes over such low-level hardware control.
>
> Considering that Linux (on my machine) doesn't appear to
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 04:56:51PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 12:46 +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:59:29AM +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:35:01PM +0900, HIGUCHI Daisuke (VDR dai) wrote:
>
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 11:59:29AM +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:35:01PM +0900, HIGUCHI Daisuke (VDR dai) wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: "HIGUCHI Daisuke (VDR dai)"
> >
> > * Package name: mikutter
> > Version : 0.2.2.1318
> >
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 02:15:41PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Russ Allbery writes ("Re: Non-identical files with identical md5sums on
> Debian systems?"):
> > Unless you have a collection of MD5 collision attacks, or have installed a
> > package that includes a sample MD5 collision, [...]
>
> Fo
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 06:44:49AM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I do occasionally check for identical files on different systems by
> comparing their md5sums. So, just out of interest, could someone tell me
> (how to find out) how many non-identical files with identical md5sums
> t
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:50:36AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Thu, July 18, 2013 09:15, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >> - Fast startup
> >
> > I thought everyone claimed (including systemd supporters) that this was
> > a "teenager side effect" which we didn't care much about.
>
> Definitely not
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 05:42:46AM -0700, Mark Symonds wrote:
>
> Broadcom is in serious need of a full-frontal attack.
>
> Everyone should check for them before buying hardware,
> And if you 'dmidecode | grep -i broadcom' gives or says anything,
> spend your money elsewhere.
>
> Or take it
onfig's job to fix up
> a dangling e.g.
> libfoo.so -> libfoo.so.2
> symlink (because it's a missing dependency).
>
> On 2013-07-01 03:29, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> > I believe that he's referring to ld.so.cache containing a mapping of
> $SONAME ->
&
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 04:46:28PM -0400, Dave Steele wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > AFAIK most of these get fixed up by ldconfig, which means they're not a
> > problem in practice.
>
> It wasn't clear to me how this would be the case, so I reran the logs
> wi
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:04:40AM -0700, Austin English wrote:
> [...]
> FYI, some Windows viruses work under Wine (which can do whatever your
> normal user can do, unless you're using AppArmor or something similar
> to restrict it).
That's not entirely true -- a Windows-based keylogger wouldn't
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:52:40AM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> On 21 June 2013 11:24, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:34:54AM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> >> On 20 June 2013 18:26, Russ Allbery wrote:
> >> > Dmitrijs Ledkovs writes
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:34:54AM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> On 20 June 2013 18:26, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Dmitrijs Ledkovs writes:
> >
> >> Thus in a bug report 712763 [4], included below, I instead propose
> >> instead shipping slightly larger block of code in the upstart package
> >> w
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 09:44:16AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 04:40:22PM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
>
> > Bitrot doesn't happen immediately, and even when it does happen, it will
> > take time before its rate reaches an unmanageable state. Ple
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 09:49:03AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> [...]
> |While it is sad that those machines cannot profit from systemd, switching
> |to systemd as a default has no downside either: Debian continues to
> |support sysvinit for quite some time, so these machines will continue
> |to work
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:36:48PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 21:04 +0100, Roger Lynn wrote:
> > On 06/06/13 21:10, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 09:58:00AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > >> Be aware that x32 has sizeof(time_t) > sizeof(long), so you sh
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 08:01:58PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
> On 28/05/13 03:02, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > Now that we are done with systemd for the time being, can we have the
> > flame war about replacing Exim with Postfix as the default MTA?
> >
> > Are there any objections other than "
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:38:52AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> [...]
> Not for what he's described. dig @$other_server would still work just fine,
> you would merely have /etc/resolv.conf pointing at 127.0.0.1 and have the
> *kernel* handle the DNS forwarding instead of using dnsmasq or another
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:22:32AM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> [...]
> I've also seen another laptop that is on the fringe of a wifi coverage
> zone getting into a bad state where multiple copies of the wifi password
> window appear - if the laptop is unattended for a few hours, you can
> come ba
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:10:53AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Chow Loong Jin (11/06/2013):
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:29:33AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > > I said random, not deterministic. Giving back until a certain test
> > > succeeds, for instance. Becau
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:29:33AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Chow,
>
> am Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 09:15:48AM +0800 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 07:56:24PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
> > > > So, I think the developer should have a set of tools (including gb and
> > >
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 09:45:35PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> [...]
> > A. resolv.conf is a static file which changes only very rarely.
> > Implications:
> > 1. Existing DNS client applications do not need to change.
> > 2. DNS service should always be provided at a fixed address
> >
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:31:07PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:17:26PM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> > > > > >>> * Package name: libsdl2-mixer
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Isn't this p
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:43:57PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 07:56:24PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
> > So, I think the developer should have a set of tools (including gb and
> > even "slight" removal commands), which allow him to do the most of
> > packaging work
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 05:42:55PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 05:12:22PM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> > > >>> * Package name: libsdl2-mixer
> > > >>
> > > >> Isn't this packaged already? You don'
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:06:24AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On 10-06-13 10:32, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 09:59:22AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> >> On 08-06-13 00:33, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> >>> * Package name: libsdl2-mixer
> >>
> >> Isn't this p
On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 01:06:40PM -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> [...]
> In my gross stupidity this seems like a nonissue. How does a popup
> asking for your root p/w differ from using the CLI, typing "su" and
> being asked for the root p/w? I'm assuming that the popup was in
> connection with a
On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 11:14:56AM +0200, Thomas Koch wrote:
> On Thursday, June 06, 2013 09:01:05 PM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 04:31:43PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> > > Package: wnpp
> > > Severity: wishlist
> > > Owner: Julien Danjou
> > >
> > > * Package name
On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 08:00:39AM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> because of backward incompatibility I have to add a suffix to
> my library package name. But lintian keep noticing the mismatch.
> I know the the soname of a library can be specify by passing
> appropriate options to
On 06/06/2013 06:54, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2013-06-05 15:02:35 -0700 (-0700), Russ Allbery wrote:
> [...]
>> Did I miss anything?
>
> I don't understand at all how you could have missed such a prime
> opportunity to rile up the vi vs. emacs debate while you were at
> it... or am I showing my
On 03/06/2013 00:33, Simon McVittie wrote:
> [...]
> The current upstream systemd has an "include" mechanism by which the
> unit in /etc can say "copy all keys from the upstream version in /lib,
> then set Foo=bar", and also a mechanism by which individual keys in a
> unit can be overridden by a se
I really like how this paragraph:
On 23/05/2013 02:41, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> [...]
> And another one. Why is it that almost anyone who isn't favor of
> systemd is directly going off insulting their developers or any
> of the organizations behind of it?
and this paragraph:
> Blame Ca
On 23/05/2013 02:35, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> Sure; obviously the right thing to do is to instead take stuff from GNOME
>> > and freedesktop.org without regard to integration with our existing system,
>> > because if Lennart says it's right it must be so.
> Honestly, these personal accus
On 17/05/2013 19:50, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 17/05/13 10:43, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
>> On 17/05/2013 13:17, Guillem Jover wrote:
>>> I agree dlopen()ing shared libraries in general should not be
>>> supported (I'd even go further and say this should be outrigh
On 17/05/2013 13:17, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Yeah that should be the case, the dynamic linker should not be
> loading the same SONAME multiple times, so there should be no race
> here, and I agree dlopen()ing shared libraries in general should not
> be supported (I'd even go further and say this sho
On 17/05/2013 01:01, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
>
> Patch releases are NOT available as zip files and the list of wrongdoings is
> long:
> - Patch releases are only available from the git repository
Maybe I'm daft, but I can't seem to find any patch releases, actually. Where are
they stored?
-
On 09/05/2013 06:06, Florian Weimer wrote:
> I mistyped, I meant ABI. I'm deeply sorry about that, it mangles my
> statement quite badly.
>
> AFAIK, this is the major reason why the C++11 support is still marked
> as experimental.
C++ never had a set ABI in the standard. It's up to compiler/tool
On 03/05/2013 16:12, Arto Jantunen wrote:
> Chow Loong Jin writes:
>
>> On 03/05/2013 15:01, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> Isn't that already possible?
>>
>> It is? I should try that out with my next upload.
>
> No, it's not. Source only up
On 03/05/2013 15:01, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Isn't that already possible?
It is? I should try that out with my next upload.
--
Kind regards,
Loong Jin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 02/05/2013 18:48, Neil Williams wrote:
> After Wheezy is released, we can talk about throwing away all binary
> uploads again... if we can't prevent people doing the wrong thing, we
> might have to send bits of what gets uploaded to /dev/null.
While we're at it, can we also have source-only upl
On 23/04/2013 23:15, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Joachim Breitner debian.org> writes:
>
>> The (luxury) problem is that I got used to it and began uploading the
>> new (and NEW) dependency bar of package foo along with the new version
>> of foo (instead of uploading bar first, wait for NEW processin
On 09/04/2013 06:43, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 04:19:19AM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
>> Actually, in the event of aptitude not being able to resolve the dependencies
>> satisfactorily the first round (from aptitude install foo), aptitude allows
>> yo
On 08/04/2013 23:02, Eugene Lychauka wrote:
> http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/amd64/release-notes/ch-whats-new.html#pkgmgmt
>
> Here we can read:
>
> "The preferred program for interactive package management from a
> terminal is aptitude. For a non-interactive command line interface for
>
On 04/04/2013 06:39, Viacheslav Fedorov wrote:
> Samuel Thibault mailto:sthiba...@debian.org>> writes:
>>>when allocating an anonymous physical page on a Page Fault,
>>> why does kernel have to fill it with zeroes?
>>> I understand it has something to do with security.
>>See man mmap. Anonymous mem
On 26/03/2013 16:28, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On 26-03-13 09:03, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 05:18:25AM +0100, Martin Eberhard Schauer wrote:
>>> as far as I googled, Chrome is not packaged by Debian, but Chromium is.
>>> So better complain at Google.
>>
>> If userspace is able t
On 09/02/2013 08:38, Russ Allbery wrote:
> The proposal made in the Policy bug, which seems quite reasonable to me,
> is that we should only annotate packages with Built-Using if there are
> license implications to the inclusion of the source. Documenting things
> like libgcc.a that have explicit,
On 08/02/2013 10:07, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 10:00:47AM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> [...]
>> Well, relative to other languages, I think Python's had the most changes
>> with regards to build helper tools -- there was dh_pycentral, and
>> d
On 07/02/2013 09:16, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
>> > Debian's Python build helper tools are still breeding like rabbits,
>> > there is a new one in experimental. I guess because the current ones
>> > dh_python2/dh_python3 don't handle packages that contain only code
>> > that runs on both python2 and
On 07/02/2013 01:35, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> >
> Which would be the wrong way of doing things / wrong reason
> for using root as running user, since you can set the
> CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE capability... (man capabilities ...)
Yeah, I figured as much, but isn't that a Linuxism?
--
Kind regards,
L
On 06/02/2013 16:27, Martin Wuertele wrote:
> * Shawn [2013-02-05 18:43]:
>
>> socket-activation in systemd _helps_ security in that you can give an
>> unprivlidged process a listening port under 1024. (using a privileged
>> configuration file)
>
> Privileged vs. unprivileged port is not really
On 05/02/2013 18:53, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> FFS, yet another new language where the implementors have refused to
> think ahead and consider ABI handling? Idiots. :-(
I totally agree with you here.
> Considering the mess that we already have with (for example) Haskell
> in this respect, I would v
On 01/02/2013 05:23, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> This arrangement works pretty well for me in practice, especially since
> `virtualenv --system-site-packages` can usually give you the mix you need.
Yes it does in most cases, but --system-site-packages can do the wrong thing in
certain edge-cases like tr
On 31/01/2013 13:32, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
>> >
> Don't forget package.el for emacs!
Wait, what? package.el uses Ruby, and not elisp?
--
Kind regards,
Loong Jin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 31/01/2013 05:16, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
>> >
>>> > > Having multiple package managers which don't know about each other on a
> system
>>> > > is evil™ (but in some cases, can be
On 30/01/2013 05:57, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> I am not familiar with the Ruby situation, I only know that many Ruby
> developers seem to be very angry at Debian people. Is there a summary of
> the events that I could read?
I'm not very familiar with the situation myself, but the gist of it, as
On 28/01/2013 20:04, Paul Wise wrote:
> licensecheck --copyright -r `find -type f` |
> /usr/lib/cdbs/licensecheck2dep5 > debian/copyright
You don't need the the `find...` bit in there. "-r" is recursive, so just
specifying "." is good enough.
licensecheck2dep5 is actually pretty good. I use it to
On 24/01/2013 13:09, Adam Borowski wrote:
> [...]
> * the monolithic design has a huge freeness problem. To do anything not on
> a rigid list of features you need to learn the intricaties of a large
> complex system, and you can be certain that even if you manage to do so,
> your patches wil
On 24/01/2013 12:56, Paul Johnson wrote:
> [...]
> I've just learned that, if I build amd64 packages, I can't install
> them for testing because I've not also built the i386 packages.
> [...]
> That's really inconvenient! I don't understand why there has to be a
> linkage between the shared library
On 16/01/2013 06:16, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> >
>> > I believe that dpkg-shlibdeps checks in these places:
>> > - /var/lib/dpkg/info/*.shlibs
>> > - /etc/dpkg/shlibs.{default,override}
>> >
>> > Could you grep libc6-amd64 in these places? That should provide a hint as
>> > to
>> > where this depen
[Whoops, forgot to send on list]
On 15/01/2013 15:48, Paul Johnson wrote:
> To create the shlibs dependency, I think dpkg-shlibdeps is reading
> files in /var/lib/dpkg/info. I can't find any "2.7" associated with
> libc6-amd in there.
>
> And, if libc6-amd is really the i386 version of the C libr
On 07/01/2013 13:23, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> You are wrong. Debian Edu also expect /etc/network/interfaces to have
> the complete network setup.
What package is that?
--
Kind regards,
Loong Jin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 07/01/2013 07:12, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Please keep in mind that such a setup will break existing tools and
> scripts, which rely on finding the interface definitions in /e/n/i.
> E.g. the ifupdown plugin in NetworkManager doesn't know anything about
> such a source directive.
> If you are goin
1 - 100 of 192 matches
Mail list logo
