Re: Bug#203639: ITP: cpudyn -- CPU dynamic frequency control

On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 06:01:44PM +0200, CÃdric Delfosse wrote: > > I don't understand why a cpufreq patch is needed for kernel. With a > recent ACPI (like in 2.4.22), you can change CPU performance (for a P4, > I don't know for PPC) like this: > > Why is a cpufreq patch needed for P4 processor

Re: Packages up for adoption: ap-utils, igal, tcpflow

On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 09:39:54PM +0100, Robert McQueen wrote: > Just a brief note to draw people's attention to the following RFAs > I filed a few days ago: > #193116 ap-utils -- Access Point SNMP Utils for Linux > #193117 igal -- online image gallery generator > #193118 tcpflow -- TCP flow re