On 30/03/17 08:05, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:10:01PM +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>> Apache 2.0 is compatible with GPLv3 [1] (therefore also with GPLv2+).
> It's more complicated than "therefore also".
> Imagine a GPL2+ prog
On 30/03/17 21:29, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>> * License Must Not Contaminate _Other_ Software
>
> A work which is a derivative work of another piece of software isn't
> merely distributed alongside.
>
>> Shippi
On 30/03/17 21:09, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Lars Wirzenius writes:
>
>> Instead, I'll repeat that licenses shouldn't be violated. One way of
>> achieving that is to ask copyright holders for additional permissions
>> that are needed to avoid a violation.
>
> The problem with this approach, though,
On 30/03/17 14:31, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez writes ("Re: System libraries and the GPLv2"):
>> However, I still don't understand why we don't just declare OpenSSL a
>> system library; or at least define a clear policy for when a packag
On 30/03/17 10:44, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez (2017-03-30 05:08:24)
>> On 30/03/17 03:11, Clint Byrum wrote:
>>> Excerpts from Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez's message of 2017-03-30 02:49:04
>>> +0200:
>>>> I understand
On 30/03/17 03:11, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez's message of 2017-03-30 02:49:04
> +0200:
>> On 30/03/17 00:24, Philipp Kern wrote:
>>> On 03/29/2017 11:10 PM, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>>>> So, the best case situation
On 30/03/17 00:24, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 03/29/2017 11:10 PM, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>> So, the best case situation (IMHO) would be that a lawyer tell us that
>> Apache 2.0 is also compatible with GPLv2-only, and that we stop playing
>> the game of being amate
On 30/03/17 00:26, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>> On 26/03/17 01:01, Walter Landry wrote:
>>> Florian Weimer wrote:
>>>>> #5 Declare GMP to be a system library.
>>>>>
>>>> (snip)
>>>>
>>>
On 29/03/17 22:25, Brian May wrote:
> Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez writes:
>
>> But in the worst case, it will be compatible with GPLv2+ and GPLv3.
>
> I am not sure I see this as the worst case situation. Or maybe you meant
> to write "incompatable"?
>
No.
A
On 29/03/17 22:28, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 09:58:07PM +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>> So... does this means that we are actually *now* shipping OpenSSL with
>> GPL software on the same DVD?
> This is permitted, or are you joking?
>
On 29/03/17 19:37, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:49:48 +0200 Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>
> [...]
>> I think that any package that is essential for the base OS
>> (aka Priority: required) should qualify for the system exception.
>
> We
On 29/03/17 15:58, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote:
>> On 26/03/17 01:01, Walter Landry wrote:
>>> Florian Weimer wrote:
> #5 Declare GMP to be a system library.
>
(snip)
> #5 was how Fedora looked at the OpenSSL library issue. Since Debian
> has another viewpoint on OpenSSL I so
On 26/03/17 01:01, Walter Landry wrote:
> Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> #5 Declare GMP to be a system library.
>>>
>> (snip)
>>
>>> #5 was how Fedora looked at the OpenSSL library issue. Since Debian
>>> has another viewpoint on OpenSSL I somehow doubt we would use it for
>>> GMP.
>>
>> I would like t
On 10/08/16 15:19, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Ian Jackson, on Wed 10 Aug 2016 13:45:05 +0100, wrote:
>> Adam D. Barratt writes ("Re: use long keyid-format in gpg.conf (Re: Key
>> collisions in the wild"):
>>> [explanation]
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> I don't know what side of this (one) line such a proposed
On 22/04/16 14:48, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:11:39PM -0700, Rudi Cilibrasi wrote:
>> * Package name: flipcoin
>> * URL : https://github.com/rudi-cilibrasi/flipcoin
>> Description : flip an adjustable coin for random exit status
>>
>> This command-line u
On 04/07/15 19:40, Jan Gloser wrote:
> computers people somehow started to think that everything in this domain
> should be free. Well, I don't really think so. If you go to the market and
> want to get some apples, it's only fair that you pay for the apples. It's
> your way to say to the apple-sel
On 13/11/14 23:16, Brian May wrote:
> On 14 November 2014 04:20, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
> wrote:
>
>> The last one that I read is that udev is going to stop working on
>> non-systemd systems:
>>
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2014-May
On 13/11/14 18:11, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> And it sure would be nice if
> we don't have the same amount of pain as each of these components get
> proposed. (My personal hope is that if they are optional, as opposed
> made mandatory because GNOME, network-manager, upower, etc. stops
> working if you
On 11/09/14 14:36, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 21:36 +, Nick Phillips wrote:
> [...]
>> Debian has a good and hard-earned reputation for not messing up
>> sysadmins' changes; upgrading to systemd - however wonderful it is (and
>> I confess to having no opinion on that) - withou
On 09/09/14 23:17, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>> That way of testing is completely unreliable when we are talking about
>> > low level stuff (kernel/udev/systemd).
> No, it's not. It is able to emulate most of the concerns people are
> talking about in this thread. Nobody has so far showed up and bee
On 09/09/14 22:34, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> I truly believe that making systemd the default without asking the user
> to test it first, is going to cause more breakage and angry users than
> doing it the other way.
s/making systemd the default/replacing the user init sy
On 09/09/14 22:18, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
>
>> But if you don't (Is not uncommon to have servers on remote locations
>> that are only accessible via ssh) and the machine don't boots properly
>> you can find yourself in trou
On 09/09/14 15:14, Mathieu Parent wrote:
> 2014-09-09 13:46 GMT+02:00 Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez :
> [...]
>> So, when upgrading from Wheezy to Jessie, we have three options:
>>
>> 1) Keep the user init system (sysvinit most probably)
>> 2) Upgrade to systemd after
On 09/09/14 13:10, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>> > I believe most our users prefer to stay with sysvinit when upgrading from
>> > wheezy
> And I believe that most our users don't care. But I as a maintainer
> and operator of several daemons I really do care to have as most
> unified environment for debugg
On 03/07/14 22:50, David Weinehall wrote:
> Why would the NSA take even the slightest risk of discovery
> when they could put a backdoor in a driver for a piece of hardware that
> has full access to your system?
Or on the firmware of your HDD/SDD:
http://s3.eurecom.fr/~zaddach/docs/Recon14_HDD.pd
On 01/07/14 18:09, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jul 01, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>
>> I think that a critical debconf warning should be in place to avoid
>> replacing the init system of users without prior explicit consent.
> I think that this would be an annoy
On 01/07/14 17:20, Thomas Weber wrote:
> Or, taking a different perspective: now that the issue is known, what is
> done to prevent another user from hitting the very same issue in the
> future?
I think that a critical debconf warning should be in place to avoid
replacing the init system of users
On 30/06/14 23:47, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> Unless I'm mistaken, the wording in the PHP license makes it invalid for
>> > anybody that isn't actually the PHP project to use without making a
>> > false claim that "THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE PHP DEVELOPMENT
>> > TEAM".
> The fact that ~nobody els
On 10/05/14 00:50, Russ Allbery wrote:
> we should also prepare for that situation
> and ensure that any switch of an init system via package installation
> results in a critical debconf warning so that no one is caught by
> surprise.
>
> This has the advantage of future-proofing against any later
On 11/05/14 09:18, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sat, 10 May 2014 19:47:10 +0100, Brian
> wrote:
>> On Sat 10 May 2014 at 12:05:25 -0400, John wrote:
>> A couple of quotes from your mail:
>> > "I find myself appalled at the rude and domineering attitudes of
>> > almost all systemd's defenders."
>>
>> Y
On 17/04/14 00:23, Aaron Zauner wrote:
> Now shipping grsec is a really good idea. I'd like to see that as well.
There has been an attempt to provide an official grsec-flavour of the
Debian kernel, but it didn't worked:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605090
For those interested
On 13/02/14 22:10, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On 13 February 2014 16:13, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Donnerstag, 13. Februar 2014, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>>> >> this is just a pledge to you all fellow debian developers to update your
>>> >> build environment before you build a package
On 28/01/14 16:53, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> There seems to be some good news:
> https://gmplib.org/repo/gmp/rev/02634effbd4e
> | Update library files license to use LGPL3+ and GPL2+.
Do you know what motivated the change?
Was because of the license issue in Debian?
signature.asc
Description: Op
On 18/01/14 19:37, moli wrote:
>* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
> ineffective)?
>
> I started chrome and opened 5 youtube 10 hour long videoes (i was planning to
> test my cooling solution). The processor load was at 80% (!! not 100%!), the
> ram was at ~90%.
On 23/12/13 02:16, Shawn Wilson wrote:
> My gut reaction was that #5 or #6 are the best option (leaning to #6).
> However I guess I don't understand what making something a system library
> effects the license?
>
> Andreas Metzler wrote:
>>
>> #5 Declare GMP to be a system library.
>>
>> #6 Mov
On 22/12/13 21:59, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>> #1 Fork LGPLv2.1+ GMP (version 4.2.1) for Debian.
>> >
>> > This seems like the best idea, as it lets us use newer versions of
>> > GnuTLS that support elliptic curves with the minimum amount of pain.
> I think this would be a good idea if GnuTLS doesn't
On 28/10/13 20:14, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> For those who haven't seen it, Lennart has posted some of his comments
> about all this on G+:
> https://plus.google.com/u/0/115547683951727699051/posts/8RmiAQsW9qf
And here is the reply from Gentoo developer Patrick Lauer:
http://gentooexperim
On 30/05/13 12:15, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Ben Hutchings writes:
>> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 09:06:59PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 05:11:35PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mercredi 29 mai 2013 à 16:31 +0200, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino a
écrit :
> Take for
On 31/05/13 08:41, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
> A utility to scan syslog and convey important information to the user
> would be much more useful than configuring all mailers in Debian to read
> root's local mail by default. I know how to redirect root's mail
> elsewhere, thank you for not makin
On 29/05/13 08:18, Chris Knadle wrote:
> On Monday, May 27, 2013 21:02:22, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> > Now that we are done with systemd for the time being, can we have the
>> > flame war about replacing Exim with Postfix as the default MTA?
>> >
>> > Are there any objections other than "but I like i
On 30/05/13 13:27, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Thursday, May 30, 2013 01:01:46 PM Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>> On 30/05/13 12:27, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>>> On Thursday, May 30, 2013 12:16:38 PM Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>>>> On 29/05/13 08:18, Chris K
On 30/05/13 12:27, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Thursday, May 30, 2013 12:16:38 PM Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>> On 29/05/13 08:18, Chris Knadle wrote:
>>> - Exim is more popular
>>>
>>> http://www.securityspace.com/s_survey/data/man.201201/mxsurv
On 29/05/13 08:18, Chris Knadle wrote:
> - Exim is more popular
>
> http://www.securityspace.com/s_survey/data/man.201201/mxsurvey.html
This is actually quite interesting.
Given that Postfix is the default MTA on RHEL/CentOS, SLES (SUSE) and
Ubuntu; meanwhile Exim is only the default on De
On 28/05/13 18:53, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 28 May 2013, Arno Töll wrote:
>> Why not consider something light, better suited for most systems which
>> need nothing but a sendmail binary which is suited to relay to a
>> real(tm) mail-server and deliver local mail and does not involve lots
>> o
On 08/05/13 17:19, Mikael Livchenko wrote:
> also, why still using mailing list? this is the 2013. Mailing list is like
> living in 1993. spam bots love mail-list. mozilla bugzilla system is good
> chat system. the user e-mail address is hidden, and there is the login
> system. no one wants hund
On 06/05/13 19:02, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Famously, Fedora made the switch
Seems that also OpenSUSE and Arch (among others) did the switch
https://kb.askmonty.org/en/distributions-which-include-mariadb/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 06/05/13 18:42, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 05:10:17PM +0100, Daniel Walrond wrote:
>> Package: wnpp
>> Severity: wishlist
>> Owner: Daniel Walrond
>>
>>
>> * Package name: opensmtpd
>> Version : 5.3.1p1
>> Upstream Author : OpenBSD
>> * URL : htt
On 27/04/13 01:46, James Cloos wrote:
>>>>>> "CALP" == Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez writes:
>
> CALP> This can be even more simple:
>
> CALP> dh_make -f ../foo-1.tar.gz
> CALP> dpkg-buildpackage
>
> And where does one find dh_make?
>
On 25/04/13 19:18, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> Gentoo:
>> > - vim foo-1.ebuild; ebuild foo-1.ebuild manifest; emerge foo
>> > - That may look like oversimplification, but the contents of
>> > foo-1.ebuild really are very simple.
> By that rationale, building a Debian package s
On 17/04/13 06:19, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When downloading a source package from somewhere else, I often find
> myself in the situation that after..
>
> $ dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc
> [...]
> dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: libreadline6-dev
> libncursesw5-dev (>= 5.3) li
On 28/02/13 15:54, Mikko Rasa wrote:
>
> We considered the possibility of updating the DDK to version 1.9, but in
> the end decided to stay with 1.7. An update of the DDK would involve an
> unknown amount of work in making the driver work with it, and that was
> deemed undesirable by the customer
On 25/02/13 15:09, Mikko Rasa wrote:
> On 21.02.2013 19:42, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>> On 21/12/12 14:23, Mikko Rasa wrote:
>>> Hi Debian developers,
>>>
>>> I'm working as a consultant on a project to develop drivers for the
>>> Pow
On 21/12/12 14:23, Mikko Rasa wrote:
> Hi Debian developers,
>
> I'm working as a consultant on a project to develop drivers for the
> PowerVR graphics processor in the Cedarview family of Intel Atom
> microprocessors in a Debian environment. The current target is Wheezy,
> and Intel wishes to ge
On 03/01/13 19:18, alberto fuentes wrote:
> Request for comments!
AFAIK there is already an ongoing effort to provide an usable updated
rolling release of Debian.
http://joeyh.name/code/debian/cut/
http://cut.debian.net/
Isn't this (more or less) what you are asking for?
signature.asc
Descr
FYI, Yet another episode of the Linux init drama:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FoundationsTeam/Specs/RaringUpstartUserSessions
https://plus.google.com/115547683951727699051/posts/ZZWLtq6tYdn
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 21/11/12 04:03, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> It may be for you or for some others, but not for all a viable option.
> Most definitely not for me, the local and remote folks I asked around
> the globe. Don't get me wrong most of them could probably "get along"
> with the fallback mode after some degr
On 20/11/12 22:55, Michael Schmitt wrote:
>
> If one likes Gnome2.x or MATE or not is a question of taste, to
> acknowledge that many users are just mad about Gnome3 is a fact. To
> offer no real sane upgrade-path for those users is... dunno how to say
> it in another way, it is just insane! I did
On 06/11/12 17:05, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Still, it did lead me to a possible cause: I am not trying to modprobe
> "microcode" in the intel-microcode postinst. This can indeed cause the
> failure to update microcode at package install time.
>
> I forget why I didn't do it that way
On 01/09/12 20:18, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 08:02:21PM +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>
>> This package contains the source code for the native implementation of ZFS
>> for the Linux Kernel, which can be used with DKMS, so
On 01/09/12 20:36, Arno Töll wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 01.09.2012 20:02, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>> This package contains the source code for the native implementation
>> of ZFS for the Linux Kernel, which can be used with DKMS, so that
>> local kernel modules
Package: wnpp
Owner: Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: spl-dkms
Version : 0.6.0
Upstream Author : Brian Behlendorf
* URL : http://zfsonlinux.org/
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: C
Package: wnpp
Owner: Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: zfs-linux
Version : 0.6.0
Upstream Author : Brian Behlendorf
* URL : http://zfsonlinux.org/
* License : CDDL
Programming Lang: C
On 11/08/12 07:12, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 08/11/2012 05:53 AM, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
>> Declaring "one area -- one chosen tool" is declaring the monopoly in the
>> area. As with other monopolies, this often leads to "vendor" lock-in,
>> stagnation, stopping developing the standards. Have s
On 09/08/12 15:54, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Please do not bother.
> openrc was recently discussed on debian-devel@ and there was a large
> consensus that it is not a credible alternative to upstart and systemd.
> We do not need to be able to choose among multiple init implementations.
>
What about
On 09/08/12 22:05, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> What you are proposing here is a hack based on dangerous assumptions.
Why you say this is a dangerous assumption?
I am not proposing adding this to already installed machines via
upgrades, but to add this feature to d-i, so it automatically adds sbin
dir
On 08/08/12 12:11, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 08/08/2012 10:32 AM, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>> I think this is a great idea :)
>>
>> You can't imagine how much I blame Debian each time I have to type the
>> full path "/sbin/ifconfig" as a non-ro
On 08/08/12 03:16, Ulrich Dangel wrote:
> Currently the default PATH for Debian does not include /sbin, /usr/sbin, nor
> /usr/local/sbin. If an user wants to run a program in either /sbin/ or
> /usr/sbin
> the full path must be specified.
>
> Some programs don't necessarily need root privileges l
On 25/07/12 04:19, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>
> On Tue, 24 Jul 2012, Artem Leshchev wrote:
>> * Package name: crtools
>> >...<
>> Checkpoint/Restore In Userspace, or CRIU, is a tool, that can freeze a
>> running
>> application (or part of it) and checkpoint it to a hard drive as a collecti
On 22/07/12 04:41, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Such Debian stickers would make no sense without certification. A hardware
> certification can only be done if we have the necessary software to do it.
> We don't have it (yet), so let's discuss that instead, then when we have
> it, we may talk about Debia
~~~~~~~
Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez http://neutrino.es
Igalia - Free Software Engineeringhttp://www.igalia.com
~~~
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
disk.
I really think this is the way to go :)
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez http://neutrino.es
Igalia - Free Software Engineering
-PID basis
and block (sleep) the pid while its cache is full.
Thanks!
Best regards!
--
~~~~~~~
Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez http://neutrino.es
Igalia - Free Software Engineeringhttp://www.igalia.com
er when using tmpfs for /tmp
- [...]
Regards!
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez http://neutrino.es
Igalia - Free Software Engineeringhttp://www.igalia.com
~~~
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
document which says that its recommended the use
of /tmp for "small" files?
--
~~~~~~~
Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez http://neutrino.es
Igalia - Free Software Engineeringhttp://www.igalia.com
~~~
tem with a HDD and on
another with a SSD.
Best regards!
Thanks a lot!
--
~~~~~~~
Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez http://neutrino.es
Igalia - Free Software Engineeringhttp://www.
om/2011/02/15/debian-6-installation-and-disk-partitioning-guide/
--
~~~~~~~~~~~
Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez http://neutrino.es
Igalia - Free Software Engineeringhttp://www.igalia.com
~~~
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
!
[1] http://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/FHS_2.3/fhs-2.3.html
[2] http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/doc/Posix-1003.2.txt
--
~~~~~~~~~~~
Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez http://neutrino.es
Igalia - Free Software Engineeringht
is simply *not* *true*. It is *not* defined on any standard
that files on /tmp should be small. Period.
Regards!
[1]
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=90222140834090&w=2
http://marc.info/?t=9022392841
[2]
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#TMPTEMPORARYFILES
--
On 26/05/12 19:43, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez writes:
>> On 26/05/12 19:13, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
>>> I find some of the assertions in this thread confusing. I've been
>>> using tmpfs /tmp on my laptop for quite some time and have watched
vies via the Adobe Flash player and have never noticed any unexpected
> consumption of space in /tmp.
>
> Are you sure that video streaming via Adobe's Flash player works the way
> that you seem to think it works?
>
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666096
--
~~~~
hen the system is swapping.
I don't know the ultimate reason behind this ugly behaviour of Linux
when the swapping process is happening, but I know this is real and it
happens because I have experimented this situation myself more than a
couple of times.
Regards!
--
~~
s to go back to Windows.
What happens if tmpfs on /tmp is *not* the default?
* The user is happy with Debian because he can get things done and
tells its friend about Debian.
Regards!
--
~~~~~~~
Carlos Albe
lel means that if we have to run something, we
should not serialize its start-up (as sysvinit does), but run it all at
the same time, so that the available CPU and disk IO bandwidth is maxed
out, and hence the overall start-up time minimized.
""" http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/
old-good sysvinit scripts when systemd is not installed on the system.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~
Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez http://neutrino.es
Igalia - Free Software Engineer
On 31/03/12 17:40, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 03/30/2012 09:46 AM, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>> This can be the solution we are looking to tie together the different
>> init systems.
>>
> Hi,
>
> Others have already expressed their view that using a *new*
On 31/03/12 01:03, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2012-03-30 19:43:48 +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>> On 30/03/12 12:29, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>>> I don't know what's going on exactly, but from the logs, it seems
>>> that when suspending, the c
o set it again.
Regards!
--
~~~~~~~~~~~
Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez http://neutrino.es
Igalia - Free Software Engineeringhttp://www.igalia.com
On 30/03/12 08:18, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
>
>> > On 20/03/12 07:14, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>>> > > FWIW, I have a proposal for a GSoC task this year to write a
>>> > > systemd-to-initscript converter,
>>> >
://darcs.nomeata.de/metainit/examples/
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez http://neutrino.es
Igalia - Free Software Engineeringhttp://www.igalia.com
~~~
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
to metainit via a new debian standard-version
and also with lintian warnings if a startup script other than the
metainit one is detected on the package.
This can be the solution we are looking to tie together the different
init systems.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~
ting (making Network Manager work also without X) would be
> the default!
$ sudo apt-get remove network-manager*
$ sudo apt-get install wicd wicd-curses wicd-gtk
^ wicd-kde ?
$ wicd-curses
And enjoy your network without the NM mess :)
--
~
On 02/02/12 14:43, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> On 02/02/12 14:31, Stefan Esser wrote:
>> considering the fact that you write this email the very same day that a
>> remote code execution vulnerability in PHP is found that is easy to exploit
>> from remote and is gre
128/PHP-PHP.html?vendor_id=74
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez http://neutrino.es
Igalia - Free Software Engineeringhttp://www.igalia.com
~~~
doing this I think is a mistake and should be fixed.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez http://neutrino.es
Igalia - Free Software Eng
e-list for hardware that is
> installed
> but never used) and then make a small white-list for the USB devices that are
> suitable for use.
https://lwn.net/Articles/470906/
--
~~~~~~~~~~~
Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
On 16/11/11 11:37, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Assuming you have increased your SWAP by the size of the tmpfs to
> compensate for /tmp now using RAM+SWAP you can only ever get that effect
> in cases where the OOMKiller would have already been triggered with /tmp
> on disk.
We are talking about t
On 12/11/11 23:25, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le samedi 12 novembre 2011 à 23:12 +0100, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
>> Adam Borowski, le Sat 12 Nov 2011 23:08:08 +0100, a écrit :
>>> You need to increase the swap size by the amount you'd use for /tmp.
>>
>> Well, the idea of such case is precisely to
reassign 642934 wnpp
retitle 642934 ITP: aircrack-ng -- wireless WEP/WPA cracking utilities
severity 642934 wishlist
owner 642934 !
* Package name: aircrack-ng
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Thomas d'Otreppe
* URL : http://www.aircrack-ng.org
* License : GPL
98 matches
Mail list logo
