Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carlos Henrique Lima Melara
* Package name: golang-github-knadh-go-pop3
Version : 1.0.0-1
Upstream Author : Kailash Nadh
* URL : https://github.com/knadh/go-pop3
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Go
Description
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 02:31:37PM +0200, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
> Wookey wrote on 31/03/2024 at 04:34:00+0200:
>
> > On 2024-03-30 20:52 +0100, Ansgar 🙀 wrote:
> >> Yubikeys, Nitrokeys, GNUK, OpenPGP smartcards and similar devices.
> >> Possibly also TPM modules in computers.
> >>
> >
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carlos Henrique Lima Melara
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, charlesmel...@riseup.net
* Package name: qhotkey
Version : 1.5.0+git20230418.cd72a01
Upstream Contact: https://github.com/Skycoder42/QHotkey/issues/new
* URL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carlos Henrique Lima Melara
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org,
charlesmel...@riseup.net
* Package name: golang-github-serialx-hashring
Version : 0.0~git20190422.8b29126-1
Upstream Author : Sung-jin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carlos Henrique Lima Melara
* Package name: golang-github-serialx-hashring
Version : 0.0~git20190422.8b29126-1
Upstream Author : Sung-jin Hong
* URL : https://github.com/serialx/hashring
* License : Expat
Programming
Speaking only for myself - let's keep drama compartmentalized and not bring
Debian's into GSoC.
Don't take me wrong, I love Debian, but this doesn't help anybody.
Carlos
On Sat, Mar 19, 2022, 10:26 Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> Felix, Hideki, Jonathan,
>
> Th
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carlos Henrique Lima Melara
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, charlesmel...@outlook.com
* Package name: kristall
Version : 0.3+git20210303.763bd81
Upstream Author : Felix Queißner
* URL : https://kristall.random
Hi, guys. I sended a message to eve...@debian.org but the members of Debian
team the answered my letter told me that i must to send my invitation to
this account.
I hope you let me resend the message that I sended to give you a whole
information in few minutes (sorry for my large letters):
Messag
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carlos Donizete Froes
* Package name: tales-of-maj-eyal
Version : 1.6.7
Upstream Author : Nicolas Casalini [DarkGod]
* URL : https://te4.org
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: C, Lua
Description : Roguelike
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carlos Donizete Froes
* Package name: opensurge
Version : 0.5.1.2-1
Upstream Author : Alexandre Martins
* URL : https://opensurge2d.org
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: C
Description : Fun 2D retro
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carlos Donizete Froes
* Package name: surgescript
Version : 0.5.4
Upstream Author : Alexandre Martins
* URL : https://docs.opensurge2d.org
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: C
Description : scripting
You are the heir to our late Canadian gold merchant $8.2 Million
Canadian dollar.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carlos Pascual
* Package name: taurus-pyqtgraph
Version : 0.2.4
Upstream Author : Taurus Community
* URL : http://github.com/taurus-org/taurus_pyqtgraph
* License : LGPL-3+
Programming Lang: Python
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carlos Donizete Froes
* Package name: blastem
Version : 0.6.1
Upstream Author : Carlos Donizete Froes
* URL : https://www.retrodev.com/blastem
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: C
Description : The fast and
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carlos Donizete Froes
* Package name: cavestory-nx
Version : 1.3.0
Upstream Author : Carlos Donizete Froes
* URL : https://gitlab.com/coringao/cavestory-nx
* License : BSD-2-Clause
Programming Lang: C++
Description
gt;
> Just use dgit ;)
The source packages are created in the "upstream" part of the pipeline and are
of interest only to upstream (and totally optional). They are not used at all
in the debian packaging part of the pipeline. For the packaging, we use git
branches and merges only (see
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carlos Donizete Froes
* Package name: cavestory-nx
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Carlos Donizete Froes
* URL : https://github.com/coringao/cavestory-nx
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: C++
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carlos Donizete Froes
* Package name: pokemmo
Version : 1.4.1
Upstream Author : Carlos Donizete Froes
* URL : https://pokemmo.eu
* License : GPL-3.0+
Programming Lang: Shell
Description : Multiplayer online game
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carlos Donizete Froes
* Package name: jag
Version : 0.3.3
Upstream Author : Carlos Donizete Froes
* URL : https://github.com/coringao/jag
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: C++
Description : arcade-puzzle 2D
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carlos Donizete Froes
* Package name: stendhal
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Carlos Donizete Froes
* URL : https://github.com/coringao/stendhal
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: Shell
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carlos Donizete Froes
* Package name: minecraft-installer
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Carlos Donizete Froes
* URL : https://github.com/coringao/minecraft-installer/wiki
* License : Shell
Programming Lang: BSD-2
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carlos Donizete Froes
* Package name: minecraft
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Carlos Donizete Froes
* URL : https://minecraft.net
* License : BSD-2-Clause
Programming Lang: Shell
Description : blocks to build
On 30/03/17 08:05, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:10:01PM +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>> Apache 2.0 is compatible with GPLv3 [1] (therefore also with GPLv2+).
> It's more complicated than "therefore also".
> Imagine a GPL2+ prog
On 30/03/17 21:29, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>> * License Must Not Contaminate _Other_ Software
>
> A work which is a derivative work of another piece of software isn't
> merely distributed alongside.
>
>> Shippi
On 30/03/17 21:09, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Lars Wirzenius writes:
>
>> Instead, I'll repeat that licenses shouldn't be violated. One way of
>> achieving that is to ask copyright holders for additional permissions
>> that are needed to avoid a violation.
>
> The problem with this approach, though,
On 30/03/17 14:31, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez writes ("Re: System libraries and the GPLv2"):
>> However, I still don't understand why we don't just declare OpenSSL a
>> system library; or at least define a clear policy for when a packag
On 30/03/17 10:44, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez (2017-03-30 05:08:24)
>> On 30/03/17 03:11, Clint Byrum wrote:
>>> Excerpts from Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez's message of 2017-03-30 02:49:04
>>> +0200:
>>>> I understand
On 30/03/17 03:11, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez's message of 2017-03-30 02:49:04
> +0200:
>> On 30/03/17 00:24, Philipp Kern wrote:
>>> On 03/29/2017 11:10 PM, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>>>> So, the best case situation
On 30/03/17 00:24, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 03/29/2017 11:10 PM, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>> So, the best case situation (IMHO) would be that a lawyer tell us that
>> Apache 2.0 is also compatible with GPLv2-only, and that we stop playing
>> the game of being amate
On 30/03/17 00:26, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>> On 26/03/17 01:01, Walter Landry wrote:
>>> Florian Weimer wrote:
>>>>> #5 Declare GMP to be a system library.
>>>>>
>>>> (snip)
>>>>
>>>
On 29/03/17 22:25, Brian May wrote:
> Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez writes:
>
>> But in the worst case, it will be compatible with GPLv2+ and GPLv3.
>
> I am not sure I see this as the worst case situation. Or maybe you meant
> to write "incompatable"?
>
No.
A
On 29/03/17 22:28, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 09:58:07PM +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>> So... does this means that we are actually *now* shipping OpenSSL with
>> GPL software on the same DVD?
> This is permitted, or are you joking?
>
On 29/03/17 19:37, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:49:48 +0200 Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>
> [...]
>> I think that any package that is essential for the base OS
>> (aka Priority: required) should qualify for the system exception.
>
> We
On 29/03/17 15:58, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote:
>> On 26/03/17 01:01, Walter Landry wrote:
>>> Florian Weimer wrote:
> #5 Declare GMP to be a system library.
>
(snip)
> #5 was how Fedora looked at the OpenSSL library issue. Since Debian
> has another viewpoint on OpenSSL I so
On 26/03/17 01:01, Walter Landry wrote:
> Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> #5 Declare GMP to be a system library.
>>>
>> (snip)
>>
>>> #5 was how Fedora looked at the OpenSSL library issue. Since Debian
>>> has another viewpoint on OpenSSL I somehow doubt we would use it for
>>> GMP.
>>
>> I would like t
Hello.
recent u-boot for kirkwood armel devices:
http://forum.doozan.com/read.php?3,12381
Regards
--
Nos vemos en los bares.
J. Carlos
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carlos Donizete Froes
* Package name: osmose-emulator
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Bruno Vedder
* URL : http://bcz.asterope.fr/osmose.htm
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Sega Master
On 10/08/16 15:19, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Ian Jackson, on Wed 10 Aug 2016 13:45:05 +0100, wrote:
>> Adam D. Barratt writes ("Re: use long keyid-format in gpg.conf (Re: Key
>> collisions in the wild"):
>>> [explanation]
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> I don't know what side of this (one) line such a proposed
On 22/04/16 14:48, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:11:39PM -0700, Rudi Cilibrasi wrote:
>> * Package name: flipcoin
>> * URL : https://github.com/rudi-cilibrasi/flipcoin
>> Description : flip an adjustable coin for random exit status
>>
>> This command-line u
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carlos Donizete Froes
* Package name: osmose-emulator
Version : 0.9.96
Upstream Author : Bruno Vedder
* URL : http://bcz.asterope.fr/osmose.htm
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Sega Master
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carlos Donizete Froes
* Package name: osmose
Version : 0.9.96
Upstream Author : Bruno Vedder
* URL : http://bcz.asterope.fr/osmose.htm
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Sega Master System
On 04/07/15 19:40, Jan Gloser wrote:
> computers people somehow started to think that everything in this domain
> should be free. Well, I don't really think so. If you go to the market and
> want to get some apples, it's only fair that you pay for the apples. It's
> your way to say to the apple-sel
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carlos Donizete
* Package name: runescape
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Jagex Limited
* URL : http://www.runescape.com/
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Complete quests and win enormous
Package: general
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
The problem I am having is that when I turn on my laptop with the hdmi cable
connected to another screen, the laptop screen seems like "turned off".
Laptop (Screen 1) + Samsung Screen 22" (Screen 2).
The same
On 13/11/14 23:16, Brian May wrote:
> On 14 November 2014 04:20, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
> wrote:
>
>> The last one that I read is that udev is going to stop working on
>> non-systemd systems:
>>
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2014-May
On 13/11/14 18:11, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> And it sure would be nice if
> we don't have the same amount of pain as each of these components get
> proposed. (My personal hope is that if they are optional, as opposed
> made mandatory because GNOME, network-manager, upower, etc. stops
> working if you
On Sun, 2014-10-12 at 14:07 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:14:23AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > We're not the FSF here.
> >
> > I don't understand this sentence, could you explain what you mean?
>
> I was hop
On 11/09/14 14:36, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 21:36 +, Nick Phillips wrote:
> [...]
>> Debian has a good and hard-earned reputation for not messing up
>> sysadmins' changes; upgrading to systemd - however wonderful it is (and
>> I confess to having no opinion on that) - withou
On 09/09/14 23:17, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>> That way of testing is completely unreliable when we are talking about
>> > low level stuff (kernel/udev/systemd).
> No, it's not. It is able to emulate most of the concerns people are
> talking about in this thread. Nobody has so far showed up and bee
On 09/09/14 22:34, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> I truly believe that making systemd the default without asking the user
> to test it first, is going to cause more breakage and angry users than
> doing it the other way.
s/making systemd the default/replacing the user init sy
On 09/09/14 22:18, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
>
>> But if you don't (Is not uncommon to have servers on remote locations
>> that are only accessible via ssh) and the machine don't boots properly
>> you can find yourself in trou
On 09/09/14 15:14, Mathieu Parent wrote:
> 2014-09-09 13:46 GMT+02:00 Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez :
> [...]
>> So, when upgrading from Wheezy to Jessie, we have three options:
>>
>> 1) Keep the user init system (sysvinit most probably)
>> 2) Upgrade to systemd after
On 09/09/14 13:10, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>> > I believe most our users prefer to stay with sysvinit when upgrading from
>> > wheezy
> And I believe that most our users don't care. But I as a maintainer
> and operator of several daemons I really do care to have as most
> unified environment for debugg
On 03/07/14 22:50, David Weinehall wrote:
> Why would the NSA take even the slightest risk of discovery
> when they could put a backdoor in a driver for a piece of hardware that
> has full access to your system?
Or on the firmware of your HDD/SDD:
http://s3.eurecom.fr/~zaddach/docs/Recon14_HDD.pd
On 01/07/14 18:09, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jul 01, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>
>> I think that a critical debconf warning should be in place to avoid
>> replacing the init system of users without prior explicit consent.
> I think that this would be an annoy
On 01/07/14 17:20, Thomas Weber wrote:
> Or, taking a different perspective: now that the issue is known, what is
> done to prevent another user from hitting the very same issue in the
> future?
I think that a critical debconf warning should be in place to avoid
replacing the init system of users
On 30/06/14 23:47, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> Unless I'm mistaken, the wording in the PHP license makes it invalid for
>> > anybody that isn't actually the PHP project to use without making a
>> > false claim that "THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE PHP DEVELOPMENT
>> > TEAM".
> The fact that ~nobody els
On 10/05/14 00:50, Russ Allbery wrote:
> we should also prepare for that situation
> and ensure that any switch of an init system via package installation
> results in a critical debconf warning so that no one is caught by
> surprise.
>
> This has the advantage of future-proofing against any later
On 11/05/14 09:18, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sat, 10 May 2014 19:47:10 +0100, Brian
> wrote:
>> On Sat 10 May 2014 at 12:05:25 -0400, John wrote:
>> A couple of quotes from your mail:
>> > "I find myself appalled at the rude and domineering attitudes of
>> > almost all systemd's defenders."
>>
>> Y
Busca proveedores en China?
Importe con SEGURIDAD y CONFIABILIDAD,
a través de Grupo Dragón. Uruguayos en China.
Contáctenos.
www.importe-desde-china.com
E-mail: car...@importe-desde-china.com
On 17/04/14 00:23, Aaron Zauner wrote:
> Now shipping grsec is a really good idea. I'd like to see that as well.
There has been an attempt to provide an official grsec-flavour of the
Debian kernel, but it didn't worked:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605090
For those interested
On 13/02/14 22:10, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On 13 February 2014 16:13, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Donnerstag, 13. Februar 2014, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>>> >> this is just a pledge to you all fellow debian developers to update your
>>> >> build environment before you build a package
On 28/01/14 16:53, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> There seems to be some good news:
> https://gmplib.org/repo/gmp/rev/02634effbd4e
> | Update library files license to use LGPL3+ and GPL2+.
Do you know what motivated the change?
Was because of the license issue in Debian?
signature.asc
Description: Op
On 18/01/14 19:37, moli wrote:
>* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
> ineffective)?
>
> I started chrome and opened 5 youtube 10 hour long videoes (i was planning to
> test my cooling solution). The processor load was at 80% (!! not 100%!), the
> ram was at ~90%.
On 23/12/13 02:16, Shawn Wilson wrote:
> My gut reaction was that #5 or #6 are the best option (leaning to #6).
> However I guess I don't understand what making something a system library
> effects the license?
>
> Andreas Metzler wrote:
>>
>> #5 Declare GMP to be a system library.
>>
>> #6 Mov
On 22/12/13 21:59, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>> #1 Fork LGPLv2.1+ GMP (version 4.2.1) for Debian.
>> >
>> > This seems like the best idea, as it lets us use newer versions of
>> > GnuTLS that support elliptic curves with the minimum amount of pain.
> I think this would be a good idea if GnuTLS doesn't
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carlos Alvarez
* Package name: teampass
Version : 2.2.0
Upstream Author : Nils Laumaillé
* URL : http://www.teampass.net
* License : GNU AFFERO GPL3
Programming Lang: PHP, JavaScript
Description : WEB based
On 28/10/13 20:14, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> For those who haven't seen it, Lennart has posted some of his comments
> about all this on G+:
> https://plus.google.com/u/0/115547683951727699051/posts/8RmiAQsW9qf
And here is the reply from Gentoo developer Patrick Lauer:
http://gentooexperim
t stay tuned.
>
>
> That's great news.
>
> Helge and I have been working away as best we can to maintain the port. I
> know everybody is busy and this is a significant effort.
... and I'm incredibly busy with upstream glibc, but I'm trying my
best to ensure
hppa kee
On 30/05/13 12:15, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Ben Hutchings writes:
>> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 09:06:59PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 05:11:35PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mercredi 29 mai 2013 à 16:31 +0200, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino a
écrit :
> Take for
On 31/05/13 08:41, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
> A utility to scan syslog and convey important information to the user
> would be much more useful than configuring all mailers in Debian to read
> root's local mail by default. I know how to redirect root's mail
> elsewhere, thank you for not makin
On 29/05/13 08:18, Chris Knadle wrote:
> On Monday, May 27, 2013 21:02:22, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> > Now that we are done with systemd for the time being, can we have the
>> > flame war about replacing Exim with Postfix as the default MTA?
>> >
>> > Are there any objections other than "but I like i
On 30/05/13 13:27, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Thursday, May 30, 2013 01:01:46 PM Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>> On 30/05/13 12:27, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>>> On Thursday, May 30, 2013 12:16:38 PM Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>>>> On 29/05/13 08:18, Chris K
On 30/05/13 12:27, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Thursday, May 30, 2013 12:16:38 PM Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>> On 29/05/13 08:18, Chris Knadle wrote:
>>> - Exim is more popular
>>>
>>> http://www.securityspace.com/s_survey/data/man.201201/mxsurv
On 29/05/13 08:18, Chris Knadle wrote:
> - Exim is more popular
>
> http://www.securityspace.com/s_survey/data/man.201201/mxsurvey.html
This is actually quite interesting.
Given that Postfix is the default MTA on RHEL/CentOS, SLES (SUSE) and
Ubuntu; meanwhile Exim is only the default on De
On 28/05/13 18:53, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 28 May 2013, Arno Töll wrote:
>> Why not consider something light, better suited for most systems which
>> need nothing but a sendmail binary which is suited to relay to a
>> real(tm) mail-server and deliver local mail and does not involve lots
>> o
On 08/05/13 17:19, Mikael Livchenko wrote:
> also, why still using mailing list? this is the 2013. Mailing list is like
> living in 1993. spam bots love mail-list. mozilla bugzilla system is good
> chat system. the user e-mail address is hidden, and there is the login
> system. no one wants hund
On 06/05/13 19:02, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Famously, Fedora made the switch
Seems that also OpenSUSE and Arch (among others) did the switch
https://kb.askmonty.org/en/distributions-which-include-mariadb/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 06/05/13 18:42, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 05:10:17PM +0100, Daniel Walrond wrote:
>> Package: wnpp
>> Severity: wishlist
>> Owner: Daniel Walrond
>>
>>
>> * Package name: opensmtpd
>> Version : 5.3.1p1
>> Upstream Author : OpenBSD
>> * URL : htt
On 27/04/13 01:46, James Cloos wrote:
>>>>>> "CALP" == Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez writes:
>
> CALP> This can be even more simple:
>
> CALP> dh_make -f ../foo-1.tar.gz
> CALP> dpkg-buildpackage
>
> And where does one find dh_make?
>
On 25/04/13 19:18, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> Gentoo:
>> > - vim foo-1.ebuild; ebuild foo-1.ebuild manifest; emerge foo
>> > - That may look like oversimplification, but the contents of
>> > foo-1.ebuild really are very simple.
> By that rationale, building a Debian package s
On 17/04/13 06:19, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When downloading a source package from somewhere else, I often find
> myself in the situation that after..
>
> $ dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc
> [...]
> dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: libreadline6-dev
> libncursesw5-dev (>= 5.3) li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Thanks for your time and job!
I've trying to use Chromiun latest trunk but its requires libc-bin >
2.15, even I use Debian Testing I do not have this package.
Is thought to have libc 2.17 on Debian testing soon?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
On 28/02/13 15:54, Mikko Rasa wrote:
>
> We considered the possibility of updating the DDK to version 1.9, but in
> the end decided to stay with 1.7. An update of the DDK would involve an
> unknown amount of work in making the driver work with it, and that was
> deemed undesirable by the customer
On 25/02/13 15:09, Mikko Rasa wrote:
> On 21.02.2013 19:42, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>> On 21/12/12 14:23, Mikko Rasa wrote:
>>> Hi Debian developers,
>>>
>>> I'm working as a consultant on a project to develop drivers for the
>>> Pow
Package: general
Severity: important
Tags: l10n
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Trying to select another language of format in gnome-setting
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective
On 21/12/12 14:23, Mikko Rasa wrote:
> Hi Debian developers,
>
> I'm working as a consultant on a project to develop drivers for the
> PowerVR graphics processor in the Cedarview family of Intel Atom
> microprocessors in a Debian environment. The current target is Wheezy,
> and Intel wishes to ge
On 03/01/13 19:18, alberto fuentes wrote:
> Request for comments!
AFAIK there is already an ongoing effort to provide an usable updated
rolling release of Debian.
http://joeyh.name/code/debian/cut/
http://cut.debian.net/
Isn't this (more or less) what you are asking for?
signature.asc
Descr
FYI, Yet another episode of the Linux init drama:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FoundationsTeam/Specs/RaringUpstartUserSessions
https://plus.google.com/115547683951727699051/posts/ZZWLtq6tYdn
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 21/11/12 04:03, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> It may be for you or for some others, but not for all a viable option.
> Most definitely not for me, the local and remote folks I asked around
> the globe. Don't get me wrong most of them could probably "get along"
> with the fallback mode after some degr
On 20/11/12 22:55, Michael Schmitt wrote:
>
> If one likes Gnome2.x or MATE or not is a question of taste, to
> acknowledge that many users are just mad about Gnome3 is a fact. To
> offer no real sane upgrade-path for those users is... dunno how to say
> it in another way, it is just insane! I did
On 06/11/12 17:05, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Still, it did lead me to a possible cause: I am not trying to modprobe
> "microcode" in the intel-microcode postinst. This can indeed cause the
> failure to update microcode at package install time.
>
> I forget why I didn't do it that way
On 01/09/12 20:18, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 08:02:21PM +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>
>> This package contains the source code for the native implementation of ZFS
>> for the Linux Kernel, which can be used with DKMS, so
On 01/09/12 20:36, Arno Töll wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 01.09.2012 20:02, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>> This package contains the source code for the native implementation
>> of ZFS for the Linux Kernel, which can be used with DKMS, so that
>> local kernel modules
Package: wnpp
Owner: Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: spl-dkms
Version : 0.6.0
Upstream Author : Brian Behlendorf
* URL : http://zfsonlinux.org/
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: C
Package: wnpp
Owner: Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: zfs-linux
Version : 0.6.0
Upstream Author : Brian Behlendorf
* URL : http://zfsonlinux.org/
* License : CDDL
Programming Lang: C
On 11/08/12 07:12, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 08/11/2012 05:53 AM, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
>> Declaring "one area -- one chosen tool" is declaring the monopoly in the
>> area. As with other monopolies, this often leads to "vendor" lock-in,
>> stagnation, stopping developing the standards. Have s
On 09/08/12 15:54, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Please do not bother.
> openrc was recently discussed on debian-devel@ and there was a large
> consensus that it is not a credible alternative to upstart and systemd.
> We do not need to be able to choose among multiple init implementations.
>
What about
On 09/08/12 22:05, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> What you are proposing here is a hack based on dangerous assumptions.
Why you say this is a dangerous assumption?
I am not proposing adding this to already installed machines via
upgrades, but to add this feature to d-i, so it automatically adds sbin
dir
On 08/08/12 12:11, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 08/08/2012 10:32 AM, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>> I think this is a great idea :)
>>
>> You can't imagine how much I blame Debian each time I have to type the
>> full path "/sbin/ifconfig" as a non-ro
1 - 100 of 341 matches
Mail list logo
