Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Carl Fürstenberg"
* Package name: obs
Version : 0.7.2
Upstream Author : Hugh Bailey
* URL : https://obsproject.com/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C, C++
Description : Open Broadcast Software
a
opcon as node.
>
I can add that I think there are plenty of people who have been forced
to install nodejs from source onto stable systems due to the lack of
packages (I had to do that myself for a project recently)
--
Carl Fürstenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@li
I'm off course biased towards letting
nodejs having the "node" binary and let it pass to testing. But we
must find a solution to this, as nodejs is getting more and more used,
and developers are forced to install nodejs from source to be able to
use it instead of install it via the pa
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.9.2.0
Severity: normal
Per resolution of bug #639997 I would like to ask for clarification of
section 9.9 in the polcy regarding environmental variables, and if it
implicitly excludes "global" environmental variables like PATH, or if
all programs must include them
erhaps it would be time now then to get the source format 3.0 (git)
fully up and running.
--
Carl Fürstenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 2011-04-17 19:14, Neil Williams wrote:
>
> Tollef? Any change in that since 2007?
>
> (I'm not expecting such a change as pkg-config doesn't do this for dynamic
> linkage either, that is left to the package build system. As static is not
> the default build for most package build systems, it
er updating the policy to either specify
that a development package should provide a static library if
possible, or that it shouldn't provide unless there are reasonable
reasons for inclusions.
--
Carl Fürstenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
2010/9/21 Jérémy Lal :
> On 21/09/2010 01:31, Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 00:46, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>>> On 21/09/2010 00:27, Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
>>>> Package: nodejs
>>>> Version: 0.2.2-1
>>>> Severity: normal
>
> `$Config{version}' if `$Config{debian_abi}' is not set.
Might be relevant to point out that dh_perl and ${perl:Depends} should
take care of this, so for most it shouldn't be an issue.
--
/Carl Fürstenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian
ly
defined for the general file format (as above), which can be activated
with only a commandline argument to dh_config_config_model, without
the need to write perl code/understand what a model is (not all devs
can this kind of thingis).
--
/Carl Fürstenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
lar mail, so it's
understandable for me to think so
3. I feel your attitude isn't well suited for an Debian developer. Try
be more helpful instead of sounding like a dick.
--
/Carl Fürstenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
sn't define any
limits on what data it can contain, so the content "...as you can see
in the following\nbug: blablabla" is ambiguous as best.
--
/Carl Fürstenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
ven-archiver is a wrapper for plexus-archiver.
>
> Cheers,
> Torsten
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
>
>
And plexus-archiver is?
--
/Carl Fürstenberg
the ftp-masters; Then the ftp-masters only
need to do an full review on packages which has not gotten any reviews
on them, and can reject a package quickly by investigating the error
found in the report.
--
/Carl Fürstenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
s must undo any effects that the build and binary targets may
have had, except that it should leave alone any output files created
in the parent directory by a run of a binary target.
--
/Carl Fürstenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Carl Fürstenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: squeezecenter
Version : 7.0.1
Upstream Author : Logitech/Slim Devices <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.slimdevices.com/
* License : GPL,
y impossible for distributors to place anything under /srv.
> Not putting anything there means it's a fairly daft idea to have a
> webroot pointing there and expect anything to work out of the box.
I was refering to the use of /var/www, which isn't FHS valid, and no
excemption is made in the policy about that.
--
/Carl Fürstenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 16:34, Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Carl Fürstenberg said:
>> FHS 2.3 specifies in
>> http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#SRVDATAFORSERVICESPROVIDEDBYSYSTEM
>> to use /srv for "Data for
.
>
> --
> Tollef Fog Heen
> UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
I just noticed in section 10.5 that /var/www should be used, so I have
filed an bug against the policy that 10.5 contradicts 9.1.
--
/Carl Fürstenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
hat apache2 has
support for /srv/www, but it's still defaulting to /var/www.
--
/Carl Fürstenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 18:22, Jonas Meurer wrote:
> On 11/07/2008 Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 17:25, Stephen Gran wrote:
>> >
>> > I think it would be helpful to use the previous 400 discussions
n. Do you have any references to
any discussion made the last two years?
--
/Carl Fürstenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
me ID.
What do you think?
- --
/Carl Fürstenberg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://getfiregpg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkh3eOIACgkQPJieVlqrawLZQgCfdTkXZK6WPL0LP/CvnDy09FOj
hZ8AnA2KXvYJvPserW2E5cRe7epXfGKA
=1uQr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
"unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
I was thinking about this field, and "Homepage" sounds a bit ambiguous
in my ear. I would suggest changing it to "Upstream" instead. This
because not all "upstreams" has a "homepage" per definition of
"homepage" in modern sense.
--
/Carl Fürstenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 8/17/07, Sylvain Le Gall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 17-08-2007, Carl Fürstenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 8/17/07, Sylvain Le Gall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I just read your script which is quite inter
ut po4a support, then I was asked that it should be a
debhelper program instead. After that I got feedback that it shouldn't
build and install in the same script (from irc).
--
/Carl Fürstenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
, for example po4a.
3.is the xmllint invocation needed? it will require that the xml file
are 100% correct, but are that 100% necissary?
4. is dh_installmandocbookxml a too long name for the file?
--
/Carl Fürstenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
dh_installmandocbookxml
Description: Binary data
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Carl Fürstenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libparse-debcontrol-perl
Version : 2.005
Upstream Author : Jay Bonci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~jaybonci/Parse-DebCo
On 8/14/07, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 19:57:51 +0200
> "Carl Fürstenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I knew that my list was incomplete, so if you want to regenerate the
> > page, use following perl script:
On 8/12/07, Carl Fürstenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/12/07, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 14:45:42 + (UTC)
> > William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Neil Williams debian.org> wri
kg->{Source};
$source =~ s/\s\(.*\)//g;
$result .= " Debian Page::
\[http://packages.qa.debian.org/$source\]\n";;
}
if( $pkg->{"HomePage"}) {
$result .= " Upstream Page:: $pkg->{HomePage}\n";
}
$result .= " Priority:: $pkg->{Priority}\n Section:: $pkg->{Section}\n";
if( $pkg->{"Provides"}) {
$result .= " Provides:: $pkg->{Provides}\n";
}
$result .= " Description:: $pkg->{Description}\n\n";
print $result;
$resvar{$pkg->{Package}} = $result;
}
foreach my $pkg ( keys %resvar ) {
print $resvar{$pkg};
}
--
/Carl Fürstenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
7;`.
> : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
> `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to
> `-our own. Resistance is futile.
>
>
Just because I had nothing to do, I generated a list on the wiki on
all pac
Package: python2.4-doc
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.2
the file 'Doc/html/style.css' in python2.4-doc is partially created by
LATEX2HTML, and as
I have learned, that is a violation of the DFSG. Correct me if I'm
wrong.
/Carl Fürstenberg
-- System Information:
cdbs recommends:
ii autotools-dev 20060920.1 Update infrastructure for config.{
ii debhelper 5.0.42 helper programs for debian/rules
-- no debconf information
# -*- mode: makefile; coding: utf-8 -*-
# Copyright © 2007 Carl Fürstenberg <[EMAIL PROTE
On 7/21/07, gregor herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 15:52:07 +0200, Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
> > I
> > though, as it had a couple in it's list, that all of them was
> > installed, so I choosed icedove, but it then complained and dumped
On 7/21/07, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, reportbug has the option of responding to a bug report instead of
> submitting a new one, but you can send a plain e-mail if you want too.
> Whatever is easier for you.
>
>
> Don Armstrong
>
Is there any kind of commandline option? as I a
On 7/21/07, gregor herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please have a look at reportbug-ng, it might fulfill your preferences
> better.
I tried reportbug-ng, and the interface was good, but I didn't manage
to send a report, as I didn't had any mail program installed, I
though, as it had a coupl
Before, after a lot of trials and errors, I did manage to get
reportbug working, but I still get angry now and then, especially when
I choose a wrong option, as I don't know how to undo it, I must exit
the program and begin from scratch again. Other thing I feel
cumbersome, is that it's difficult t
On 7/21/07, Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
port 25 blocking may be circumvented using ssl(tls) access to smtp
server like one offered by gmail. Read the manpage of reportbug for its
command line options.
Many ISP now requests to use non-port 25 for outgoing mail. That may
be accomodated
ess to an smtp server, and are prohibited to use one by them self
by port 25 blocking) using a complicated syntax to be able to send
"correct" reports.
Perhaps I'm out on deep water here, but just wanted to give a thought.
perhaps a web-based solution (with backward compabillity to curre
40 matches
Mail list logo
