Steve Langasek wrote:
>> I am not sure where the 1G comes from, unless talking about the
>> duplicity across various mirrors.
>
> No, this is an estimate based on the actual usage of pool/main/g/gcc-4.1 on
> current Debian mirrors. (12 archs * 3 versions * n binary packages)
>
> Your note on the
Thomas Jollans wrote:
> On Saturday 04 August 2007, Brendon Costa wrote:
>> EDoc++ binaries are currently around 20M. It does not require any
>> special binutils etc, but will just use what is already available for
>> the system. I am currently building a single non-p
>
>> I believe that edoc doesn't use the code generator, only the front
>> end, so it doesn't need care from port maintainers.
>
The GCC modification attempts to change as little in the GCC framework
as possible and just performs analysis on the data structures generated
by GCC as it compiles co
Thanks for the response.
>
> Hmm, I would question whether this is something we'd want to include in the
> Debian archive as-is; I think we already have way too many gcc packages
> being carried around with our releases and that we need to try to make this
> number go down, not add more copies of
Hi all,
I was directed here from debian-mentors with my question.
--- Original Post ---
I have a software project that I plan on creating Debian packages for
which is quite different from many other packages in that it also
installs patched versions of GCC and Doxygen (That must not conflict
5 matches
Mail list logo
