Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Due to the weakness in our openssl's random number generator (see the
> Debian Security Advisory #1571 from a few minutes ago[1]) that affects
> among other things ssh keys we have disabled public key auth on all
> project systems until further notice.
Hi all,
if I underst
Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> At the end of voting, with 313 Ballots resulting in 260 votes from 257
developers, "General Resolution: Altering package upload rules" has
carried the day.
Please forgive me if this is a stupid question, but how can there be
more votes than voters?
Gerardo
From: Wouter Verhelst,,, [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Is there any sensible reason for ever uploading a package in
unstable
> > with a higher version than in experimental? If not, such uploads can
> > simply be forbidden altogether.
>
> The documented and preferred way to remove packages from
>
Anthony Towns wrote:
> Yesterday, glibc 2.3.999.2-10 was accidently uploaded to unstable
instead of experimental [...] Would anyone like to contribute their
thoughts, so we can do an "air crash" style failure analysis to work out
how we can avoid this class of problem in future, given the safety ne
4 matches
Mail list logo
