Mark Eichin writes:
> could you give me more information on this? (I'm the current libgdbm
> maintainer.) Calling it libgdbm.so.2.0 would really seem like a
> mistake, since after all, libgdbm itself is only at 1.7.3... but I can
Well, it appears that the shared lib version number of libgdbm w
Package: libgdbm1
Version: 1.7.3-11
Hi,
I believe that the shared library exported by this package
(libgdbm.so.1.7.3) is basically the same thing that other linux
distributions (slackware and redhat in particular) choose to ship as
libgdm.so.2.0.0 ... Perhaps Debian too should do this?
2 matches
Mail list logo
