Re: Re: glibc very old

Andreas Metzler > That would be a duplicate, http://bugs.debian.org/672934 exists. Okay, the Maintainer is debian-glibc list. I don't see any discussion about it in the archive, so... Maybe ask again in debian-glibc? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subj

mark 'editor' virtual package name as obsolete

hat uses it, so this name will be removed from repository. If no, maybe we need to add it again in the List? I've filed a bug about this on [1]. [1] <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682347> -- Artem Leschev signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: glibc very old

I think you need to file a bug against libc6 package about this. -- Artem Leschev signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part