Bugs which do not belong to console-setup

2014-08-07 Thread Anton Zinoviev
such cases. The bugs are: #709883 - reported 14 months ago and #724869 - reported 10 months ago. Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://l

Re: Bug#672160: Directory /boot/console-setup

2012-05-12 Thread Anton Zinoviev
s*". All configuration files owned by the package. There is no way to tell whether a file in /etc/console-setup is owned by the package console-setup or it has been put there by the admin and is unrelated to console-setup. Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@

Re: Directory /boot/console-setup

2012-05-12 Thread Anton Zinoviev
-0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 07:43:46PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote: > > Currently it creates files in the directory /etc/console-setup. As > > a result when the package is purged it is impossible to tell which > > files in /etc/console-setup are auto

Re: Bug#672160: Directory /boot/console-setup

2012-05-10 Thread Anton Zinoviev
is mounted? At least the keyboard has to be configured before fsck runs. Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120510211603.ga30...@debian.lan

Re: Bug#672160: Directory /boot/console-setup

2012-05-10 Thread Anton Zinoviev
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 07:45:21PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > > Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but /boot seems to be a very bad > choice for the location, simply because it is not available any earlier > than /var. Ah, you are right. So it seems only /etc is an optio

Directory /boot/console-setup

2012-05-10 Thread Anton Zinoviev
mmand "setupcon --save" 3. when the admin uses the command "setupcon --save" Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://

Bug#501590: PrintScreen key causes many apps to suddenly die if you are running in Linux text mode

2008-10-09 Thread Anton Zinoviev
es, not only console-data I think only console-data and console-setup. > - does nto even concern only Debian True, I can discuss this with the upstream of kbd if you agree. Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug#446030: RFA: kbd -- Linux console font and keytable utilities

2008-03-13 Thread Anton Zinoviev
[ If you reply please send CC to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 05:40:44PM +0100, Michael Schutte wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 02:10:37AM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote: > > I request an adopter for the "kbd" package. > > I’m interested in taking over, but

Re: Bug#446030: RFA: kbd -- Linux console font and keytable utilities

2007-10-10 Thread Anton Zinoviev
ng in kbd that console-tools doesn't do? Kbd supports large fonts for high-resolution framebuffer modes. Also the utilities of console-tools depend on libconsole. I think because of this it will be difficult to create small size udebs based on console-tools. Anton Zinoviev [*] http://bugs.debi

Bug#446030: RFA: kbd -- Linux console font and keytable utilities

2007-10-09 Thread Anton Zinoviev
ese bugs are easy to fix but they allow two alternative solutions). There are patches in BTS about #190385, #190386 and may be #190387 but I haven't tried to fix things I don't understand. As of #399531, in BTS there is a suggestion how to fix. And the only bug without a solution in BTS i

Re: First call for votes for the GFDL position statement

2006-02-27 Thread Anton Zinoviev
not conflict. While you are deciding how to vote, please think for a moment what is your personal interpretation of the words "must allow modifications". Please make sure that we are not pushing Debian onto the slippery path that makes Debian divorce the free software community by reject

Re: Should I rename scalable-cyrfonts?

2002-01-14 Thread Anton Zinoviev
On 12.I.2002 at 02:12 Josip Rodin wrote: > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 08:26:00PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote: > > I'am the maintainer of the package scalable-cyrfonts. It's purpose was > > to contain all free scalable Cyrillic fonts I know about. However > > recentl

Should I rename scalable-cyrfonts?

2002-01-09 Thread Anton Zinoviev
that Provides and Replaces should be sufficient to handle renaming properly. However scalable-cyrfonts-x11 is a task-package, and its renaming will force corresponding change in tasksel. Anton Zinoviev, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: iso 8859-6 fonts

2001-09-24 Thread Anton Zinoviev
On 21.IX.2001 at 05:48 Sulaiman Fahad Alhasawi wrote: > > who maintain arabic fonts/programs ? > If yes , may i know who ? if no , can some one > > apply to do so ? I would like to maintain Arabic fonts for Debian. Can you give me URLs where I can find such fonts? Anton Z

Re: Easy removal of tasks (was Re: Proposing task-debian)

2001-05-03 Thread Anton Zinoviev
-devel-0105/msg00082.html Isn't it possible to integrate debfoster in apt? Anton Zinoviev, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)

2001-01-03 Thread Anton Zinoviev
e mailer. > People want to munge Reply-To headers to make ``reply back to the > list'' easy. But it already is easy. Reasonable mail programs have two > separate ``reply'' commands: one that replies directly to the author > of a message, and another that replies t