> On Mon, Sep 04, 2000, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> > It still does not answer the original question which was about X-only/
> > non-X runlevel. In other words how to boot in multiuser mode selectively
> > with/without X. Which is quite a sensible question.
> >
>
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 12:48:24PM +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> >
> > In the circumstance when you are serving a flock of dumb clients
> > from a single machine. NCD Xterms for example. In this case you *NEED* a
> > *dm
> > running with network access tur
[snip]
>
> Isn't ctrl-alt-F[1-6] good enough to get into console mode? In what
> circumstances whould you not want X to start up on boot if you had
> installed a *dm?
>
In the circumstance when you are serving a flock of dumb clients
from a single machine. NCD Xterms for example. In th
> >
> > You cannot use it as a default shell without auditing all scripts.
> >
>
> I have used ash for over a year now as my /bin/sh.
>
OK, OK, OK, I surrender.
I have to admit my experience was rather old
and the quantity of bashisms have sharply decreased. So you can run
a
> Anton Ivanov wrote:
>
> > If you are right at least apache scripts are not. I suggest you
> > file a bug against it.
>
> If you know how to call apache scripts to demonstrate the error then
> please file the bug yourself.
>
> Check before, if yo
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 12:31:15PM +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> > >
> > > Neither SuS nor POSIX specifies -e so ash is free to do whatever it
> > > chooses.
> >
> > If you noted I have not used the word POSIX anywhere. I just said that
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 11:57:17AM +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, wrote my first message with too high blood level in the caffeine
> > subsystem. I meant echo -ne.
>
> Neither SuS nor POSIX specifies -e so ash is free to do whatever it chooses.
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 10:10:04AM +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> >
> > It parses command line -en different from bash. Different getopts ;-)
>
> How does it differ? AFAIK, ash's getopts is POSIX compliant.
Sorry, wrote my first message with too high b
> > Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On 29-Aug-2000 Miros/law `Jubal' Baran wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Isn't /bin/ash POSIX compliant?
> > >>
> >
> > > I run ash as my /bin/sh. As for its compliance, I am not certain and no
> > > one
> > > will claim it being fullly complian
> Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 29-Aug-2000 Miros/law `Jubal' Baran wrote:
> >>
> >> Isn't /bin/ash POSIX compliant?
> >>
>
> > I run ash as my /bin/sh. As for its compliance, I am not certain and no one
> > will claim it being fullly compliant.
>
> AFAIK ash is as c
no longer the case but quite a lot of people still keep
their info using an off-site address.
;-)
[snip]
- --
Anton R. Ivanov
IP Engineer Level3 Communications
RIPE: ARI2-RIPE E-Mail: Anton Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
@*** Uhlmann's Razor ***
policy. Though if you are smart enough to configure
something like this yous hould be smart enough to make it avoid the orbs wrath
;-)
[snip]
- --
Anton R. Ivanov
IP Engineer Level3 Communications
RIPE: ARI2-RIPE E-Mail: Anton Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
12 matches
Mail list logo
