Le Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 08:57:12AM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> Iustin Pop writes:
> > No, it's not off-topic, or not entirely. The post I replied to was saying
> > "it's fine to be racist against white people".
>
> No, it was not. It was saying that racism by definition has to involve a
> pow
Le Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 07:30:46PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez a écrit :
> I have a very hard time understanding how in two adjacent paragraphs you
> can say both "Sexism, racism and such are not, never were, and can not
> be funny." and also "making fun of cis-het white males can be offensive,
> and
Le Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 07:42:06PM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli a écrit :
> I did that by removing tens of sexist, homophobic and racist jokes
> that were not in the offensive section, and had been there at least
> since 2004.
Does that mean that sexist, homophobic and/or racist jokes that were in
the -
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Antoine Le Gonidec
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: metalog
Version : 20230719
Upstream Contact: Michael Kress
* URL : https://metalog.sourceforge.net
Le Sat, 12 Jul 2025 00:43:21 +0200,
Chris Hofstaedtler a écrit :
> The debhelper helpers always guard deb-systemd-invoke invocations by a
> systemd check.
Thanks for the confirmation, all is well then.
pgpRd8vz2mELx.pgp
Description: Signature digitale OpenPGP
Context is https://bugs.debian.org/1109119
On Fri, 11 Jul 2025 19:11:42 +0200 Helmut Grohne wrote:
> deb-systemd-invoke is part of init-system-helpers and therefore
> essential. It calls out to systemctl, which is not essential but for all
> practical matters we really should be treating it as
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Antoine Le Gonidec
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-devel-ga...@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: play.it-action
Version : no snapshot yet, we will trigger one soon
Upstream
Le Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 11:13:38AM -0700, Al Rice a écrit :
> I appreciate your input. Perhaps I have spoken out of turn.
I can’t promise everyone in Debian is as nice as they could be, but from
my experience the grumpiest Debian Developers tend not to interact with
newcomers.
People on the ment
> I have wanted to contribute but have held off because there seem to be some
> nasty prima donnas waiting to pounce on newbies for making mistakes.
I’ve been a Debian Maintainer for a bit more than one year, and am on my way to
become a Debian Developer. So I guess that counts as being relatively
Le Thu, 03 Jul 2025 22:17:44 +0100,
Richard Lewis a écrit :
> >> On a default install, I would therefore argue that cron is no longer
> >> very important.
> >
> > Without any particular hat: I would expect someone wanting to drop
> > cron
>
> maybe its priority should be demoted to standard,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Antoine Le Gonidec
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-devel-ga...@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: play.it-platform
Version : no snapshot yet, we will trigger one soon
It seems this Write software mostly use submodules to depend on shared
dependencies, the best move here (but probably not the easiest one) would be to
packages these dependencies first.
Write itself would be packaged afterwards, and build-depend on the packages
included before it in the Debian arc
apt is probably not the best fit for that, as a lot of its codebase would be
unused in the case of statically built binaries.
I think you should rather work on a new packages manager (that could rely on
apt libraries) with no dependencies management, that would allow it to be
quicker than apt than
> What should you do in that situation where you have a no-response MR?
I second the other e-mails suggesting to send a bug report in addition to the
merge request, or answer to the existing bug report to point to the merge
request.
For the packages I maintain, I do not get notifications about ac
Le Tue, May 27, 2025 at 04:08:13PM +0100, Ahmad Khalifa a écrit :
> As upstream has moved around a bit, wouldn't it make more sense for mono to
> package the dotnet repository for Forky instead?
Since dotnet would not fit my needs (running non-free video games
relying on Mono), I plan on keeping M
Mono was orphaned last year, and I took over its maintenance because I rely on
it to run some non-free video games (not redistributable, so not packaged into
Debian), so I can unvendor the Mono runtime shipped with these games and use
the Debian-provided runtime instead.
What this means is that my
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Antoine Le Gonidec
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-devel-ga...@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: play.it-rpg
Version : no release yet, we will trigger one soon
Upstream
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Antoine Le Gonidec
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-devel-ga...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: play.it-strategy
Version : no release yet, we will trigger one soon
Upstream Contact: Antoine Le Gonidec
* URL
> I'm still trying to understand if it's a good idea to contact
> upstream authors and tell them their software is being worked on to
> be included in Debian, or not.
I just got around opening two new RFPs, and turn an existing RFP into
an ITP. For each one, I sent a ping upstream.
The responses
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Antoine Le Gonidec
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-devel-ga...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: play.it-adventure
Version : 2024-09-19
Upstream Contact: Antoine Le Gonidec
* URL : https://git.dotslashplay.it
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Antoine Le Gonidec
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
debian-devel-ga...@lists.debian.org, deb...@dotslashplay.it
* Package name: play.it-contrib
Version : 2022.09.23
Upstream Author : Multiple ./play.it contributors
* URL
21 matches
Mail list logo
