On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 04:50:59PM +0100, Hamish Marson wrote:
> Ah right. Light dawneth. Yes, you make excellent sense. Basically ia32
> is so hacked about & wacky (In order to be backwardly compatible) as to
> be very slow, yet ia64 is a new instruction set with none of the baggage
> that it h
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 12:43:38PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 12:39:25PM +0200, Cyrille Chepelov wrote:
> > Le Thu, Apr 10, 2003, ? 10:40:47AM +0100, Hamish Marson a ?crit:
> > > I'm not sure how your logic works out that a 64 bit reg is going to
> > > be faster than a 32b
2 matches
Mail list logo
