* Luca Bruno ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080626 09:57]:
> Rebuilt from incoming for i386, it seems to work here too:
good. thanks!
> I've also seen that -4 doesn't really force ipv4 resolution and connection:
great that you thought of testing that, too. It is entirely
possible that there are more cases
* Yves-Alexis Perez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080626 08:42]:
> On jeu, 2008-06-26 at 00:28 +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > As a solution for "#481189 curl: cannot connect to IPv6 hosts
> > anymore" I added a patch to hook curl to c-ares even f
Hi!
As a solution for "#481189 curl: cannot connect to IPv6 hosts
anymore" I added a patch to hook curl to c-ares even for ipv6
lookups. Upstream is very interested in this patch, too.
Could someone with ipv6 connectivity please test the curl
packages (version 7.18.2-1e1) in experimental[1] and v
* Lucas Nussbaum ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080227 08:41]:
> On 27/02/08 at 00:42 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > Google are running their Summer of Code programme again this year[1],
> > and if we want to take part again we need to apply between March 3rd
> > and March 12th. If we'r
* Sam Hocevar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070427 05:55]:
> Meetings
>
>
>Matt Taggart proposed that dpkg developers meet in person during a
> dpkg summit[9] to talk about future dpkg development. The meeting would
> be sponsored at least by Debian and HP. I suggested inviting people from
> t
* Wookey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070208 17:48]:
> On 2007-02-08 16:52 +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> > If you know of other meetings, locations and/or sponsors that
> > would be interested in hosting meetings, please let me know!
>
> Some of us are at the Free Software Wo
* Dominic Hargreaves ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061222 17:47]:
> and then upload a new libtemplate-perl reflecting upstream's changes
> with a NEWS.Debian entry explaining the change? Should libtemplate-perl
> then Recommend or Depend on the new separate plugin modules? My
> intuition would be to avoid a
* Matthew Wilcox ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060914 14:02]:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 10:38:39AM +0300, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> > However, the most recent publications indicate that volunteer incentive
> > is not a well understood area of economics. In fact, it's one of the hot
> > topics that economist
* Anthony Towns [2006-01-21 06:06:36]:
> No, we have real problems with video codec stuff in Debian and they need
> to be resolved thoroughly, not expediently.
i was under the impression that the ftp-master team had started
to work on that several month ago, shortly before the last mention
of thi
* Norbert Tretkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-19 17:38:45]:
> * Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> > * Norbert Tretkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-19 17:02:03]:
> > > * Joseph Smidt wrote:
> > > > Do you think we will ever see backports officially su
* Norbert Tretkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-19 17:02:03]:
> * Joseph Smidt wrote:
> > Do you think we will ever see backports officially supported by
> > Debian?
>
> No.
i remember a conversation where you pointed out some principal
problems (security support, manpower) but in general were
* Anthony Towns [2006-01-19 19:21:07]:
> > In Ubuntu, we've split the package in
> > order to make -minimal essential, but never install it alone (both are part
> > of base).
>
> Then what's the benefit of having python(-minimal) be essential at all?
you are able to do init.d scripts, pre- and p
* Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-13 20:34:20]:
> ...and no one can complain afterwards.
you underestimate your fellow nagg^Wdevelopers.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-03 22:30:09]:
> >> They are right: most probably they will find it easier to make
> >> contributions to other projects.
>
> > we need to promote the easy entry points to contributing to debian
> > more prominently and should hide the "how to become a
* Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-03 12:24:29]:
> They are right: most probably they will find it easier to make contributions
> to other
> projects.
we need to promote the easy entry points to contributing to
debian more prominently and should hide the "how to become a DD"
in comparison
* Alejandro Bonilla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-02 09:21:43]:
> On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 16:06:59 +0100, Frans Pop wrote
> > On Monday 02 January 2006 15:42, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> > > so should we try to compile such a list and advertise it better,
> > &
* Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-02 22:26:46]:
> On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 10:02:34AM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
>
> > there are parts that provide a much easier and smoother entry to
> > helping debian. The debian-installer, the inofficial security
>
* Linas Zvirblis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-02 01:43:47]:
> There are a lot of people out there that are willing to help Debian, but
> "Help Debian" does look a bit like a horror detective story.
>
> I like the idea of an official title for contributers, but I am not so
> keen on I-did-this-a
* Linas Zvirblis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-12-15 00:02:01]:
> David Nusinow wrote:
>
> >>>What are you talking about Debian Style?
> >>
> >>Color scheme, artwork (default wallpaper, login screen, even CD covers).
> >>All those little things that would make a user say "Yep, that's Debian".
> >
>
* Andy Teijelo Pérez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-12-09 11:52:07]:
> Does a country considered by the U.S. government as terrorist, or with which
> having commercial relationships is forbidden for american companies, apply
> for this offering?
I got some wise advice about not to make the contry the
* Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-12-09 00:30:09]:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 09:08:58PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> > Intel is so generous to provide Debian with ten notebooks (besides
> > some server hardware), which we would like to give to develop
* Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-21 23:33:48]:
> If the DPL team is actually addressing that issue, it is not doing so
> transparently.
That was on purpose. we thought that there was something to be
learned from threads on public mailinglists that lead nowhere and
wanted to try private m
* Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-22 08:52:25]:
> * Andreas Schuldei:
>
> > i have not given up that hope yet and i invest a considerable
> > amount of time working on this issue as part of my work on the
> > DPL-Team. others there do so, too.
>
&
* Jaakko Niemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-22 17:12:00]:
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > i have not given up that hope yet and i invest a considerable
> > > amount of time working
* Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-21 08:55:52]:
> On Sun, 20 Nov 2005 11:29:19 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I seriously hope the non-elected people blocking and slowing down
> >several important processes in Debian soon realize that there is a
> >problem and t
* Rich Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-14 18:46:50]:
> Hold on - does this mean I will or won't be able to do
> apt-get install debconf6-doc
you will, and most likely it will be 100% complete. if someone
packages it.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-12 20:42:39]:
> Well, a conference that is not affiliated with Debian, such a
> requirement is not tenable, that is true. But if such a conference
> uses the Debian trademark, we can indeed ask that our core values,
> as enshrined in our so
* Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-12 23:40:57]:
> On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 12:13:51 +1000, Anthony Towns
> said:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 10:21:08PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
> > But instead, what I'm led to wonder is if this is really standing up
> > for our beliefs and
sorry for replying to this only today. i had been busy preparing
for a talk i was giving yesterday at a conf.
* Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-10 01:08:49]:
> > given your knowledge level of how debconf intents to handle
> > things and the way you escalate this issue gives me the ide
* Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-08 00:28:07]:
> "The authors have the freedom to pick a DFSG-free license" means that
> they *may* do so, but are not required to. Am I correct?
>
> IMHO, DebConf paper authors should be *required* to publish in a
> DFSG-free manner, as a condition for
* Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-07 13:57:47]:
> * Paolo Pantaleo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050907 13:55]:
> > I have spent some time to write the bash completion for apt-file command.
> > I have written a pair of email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and i didn't get any
> > response. Now i want to s
* Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-07 07:31:48]:
> Ok, but this is not what has been floating around, either here, or on the open
> solaris mailing lists. I mostly see wild claims and plain FUD and such.
Even Jörg Schilling is there. (c:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-05 20:59:10]:
some discussion happend here, but later on in the thread it
becomes clear that there is a lot of confusion of the official
position of debian towards a debian with an opensolars kernel.
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/messag
* Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-06 17:39:06]:
> Which I fail to understand, as the limited rights provided to me by
> law should be sufficient for the wiki content in most cases.
i spoke to a german lawyer about this exact (license) issue when
skolelinux.de pondered an applicabl
* Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-05 22:36:26]:
> Any help is appreciated -- improve formatting conversion, and finding bugs.
> For bugreports and patches, please mail me privately or address me on IRC
> (jvw). Once I'm reasonably content with the conversion, I'll prepare a tarba
* Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-05 21:14:20]:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 08:59:10PM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> > I just chatted with Sun's FOSS embassador Simon Phillips and i
> > asked if Sun would switch to a LGPL compatible license even for
> >
I just chatted with Sun's FOSS embassador Simon Phillips and i
asked if Sun would switch to a LGPL compatible license even for
openSolaris in the course of the recent announcement.
However he said it would stay with the CDDL and was not aware how
that would hinder a debian port of openSolaris. Cou
* Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-05 10:04:54]:
> On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 01:34:29AM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> > The wiki markup languages of twiki and moin-moin are not
> > compatible. Still it would be nice to have some content moved
> > from the ol
The wiki markup languages of twiki and moin-moin are not
compatible. Still it would be nice to have some content moved
from the old .net wiki to the new .org one. (the debconf team for
one is interested in using the features of moin-moin for easier
cooperation and to keep the existing pages.)
The
* Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-16 01:09:53]:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 02:59:17PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > [Steinar H. Gunderson]
> > > How do you make this work? Last time I tried it, X would only show
> > > the one connected to the ???active??? virtual console, and blan
* Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-15 13:17:02]:
> Scripsit Timo Aaltonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > 2 multi-user, no network services exported, no NFS
> >
> > -more secure service-wise than 3
> > -RH has network here, although they claim that 2 is not used
>
> Given that it is very
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:39:16PM +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Is the TODO list for etch available anywhere?
- multi level configuration for poplular services and some other
unpopular ones
(needed for cdds)
- change policy to allow for automatic reconfiguration of packag
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 02:31:01PM +, Dave Holland wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 01:36:17AM +0100, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> > As you might have noticed or not we are working on getting OpenLDAP 2.2
> > into unstable. The packages are mostly working fine (as available in
> > experimental)
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 11:58:06AM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > To my best knowledge Branden did not know about the proposal at
> > the time of the LWN interview. So from him it was no demagogy but
> > his own hone
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 11:05:16AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> And how do you reconcile the fact that most of those told us recently on
> debian-vote that they believed that dropping an architecture will not help
> with the delay of the release ? And giving the times of the posts, they
> probably k
* Russell Coker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031203 04:03]:
> I have sent a message to Werner asking if the GPG smart-card device could be
> re-implemented with a USB interface. I think that a USB dongle with GPG
> technology would be a good option as most developer's machines already have
> USB suppor
* Peter Busser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031104 13:55]:
> You didn't touch the other facts in the list, because you know you don't have
> any proof to easily dismiss them. You would be my hero if you succeeded in
> improving on PaX. But in all honesty, exec-shield does not do that I'm afraid.
> In fact,
* martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031006 21:57]:
> > The IPSEC stack does nothing unless you specify policies through
> > PFKEY or NETLINK. In other words, it is disabled by default.
>
> From glancing over the patch, it *also* replaces parts of the non
> IPsec i.e. standard IP stack. Maybe i
* Joe Drew ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030730 16:22]:
> On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 22:09, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:22:00PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> >
> > > Next Debconf is scheduled to be held in Vancouver, Canada.
> >
> > That would be excellent. Who is organizing it?
>
> Me
* Aaron M. Ucko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030519 04:26]:
> What are other developers' feelings on the matter these days?
I would rather not come.
* Joe Drew ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030524 01:11]:
> It's not entirely clear to me what makes Debconf into 'the' Debian
> conference. For example, if this conference in the US ends up
> happening, what's to say it isn't Debconf 3? The defining
> characteristics, so far as I can define them, are that
* Aaron M. Ucko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030519 04:26]:
> * As mentioned, we have an enthusiastic sponsor lined up, which is a
> definite plus.
What do we get from that sponsor? Conference rooms, network, accomodation,
food, flights and tshirts?
* Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030514 15:42]:
> organization, though. Tollef, do you know if there'll be wireless base
> stations around or, will we be doing ad-hoc mode?)
yes, there will be wlan. not user about the mode of operation.
and there will also be some stationary pcs there.
* Russell Coker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020419 13:31]:
> > Did the initrd load at all? If it did then it could be a bug in
> > initrd-tools. Please show me the boot messages.
an other reason for failiour was that the space in the /boot
partion was used up. I made my boot partition just big enough fo
On http://pandora.debian.org/~andreas/obsd are the tools needed
for creating debian packages of software on openbsd.
As stated vaguely half a century earlier, I would like to create a
secure debian/gnu/openbsd with the best of both worlds. For that
I would now begin to package the openbsd source
I am looking for a URL or apt-sources.list line where I can get up to date
debian packages (cvs) of samba? I need the winbind tool to connect to a
windows 2000 domain. I have allready founded and tested the samba-tng debian
packages. that winbind does not work for me and I would like to try out the
* Andreas Schuldei ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010108 00:35]:
> The main author seems to have abandoned it. The last available patch is
> against 2.2.14, and some kernel interfaces changed since then. Some
> conceptional finetuning and additional features would be nice, too.
This is not cor
Stegfs is a stegnographic (spelling?) filesystem, coming in the form of a
kernel patch and some userspace tools. It is a very secretiv way of storing
data on partitions. It combines information hiding and cryptography with the
result that even the filesystem itself does not know if there *is* any d
* Andreas Schuldei ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [001229 23:24]:
> I try to build a crosscompiler i386->arm (but also other archs). At one
> point headerfiles for the target architecture are needed. Where could I find
> headerfiles for other archs? Are there development packages for this purpos
I try to build a crosscompiler i386->arm (but also other archs). At one
point headerfiles for the target architecture are needed. Where could I find
headerfiles for other archs? Are there development packages for this purpose?
Who has done this before?
* marty macdonald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000912 22:52]:
> I mean, the whole thing here is to show the ultimate
> differences between the Linux kernel and the kernels
> found when using multiple banjos. This research was
> supported by Dr. Rimulak in his infamous "Kernal VS
> Banjo - A Duality?". Th
* Joe Block <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000315 18:25]:
> I'm interested. I'd like to be able to make a boot disk with ntfs &
> vfat support so I can use it as a rescue disk for hosed windows boxes.
>
> Ideally, I'd like to see a shell script that asks what network card the
> target box uses and creates
My first mail seems to got lost. excuse me if this turns up twice.
In fact I am working on an minimal debian (-based) system.
I am building an embedded system which tries to be as small as possible.
I started with the linux router project, took some parts from the
bootfloppys and wrote some Makef
63 matches
Mail list logo
