Re: Compiz-fusion question

2007-10-22 Thread Alok G. Singh
On 21 Oct 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have found that compiz-fusion in official debian repository is not > complete (or is not compiz-fusion at all). shame has some thoroughly unofficial packages [1] that work (not from personal experience though). Footnotes: [1] http://shame.tuxfamily.

Re: emacs21 removal?

2007-07-31 Thread Alok G. Singh
On 28 Jul 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm starting to submit wishlist bug reports. If emacs21 is > removed, I'll submit bug reports to all of the following packages > with `Severity: serious' or so. > Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > quack-el Ramki had stopped maintaining t

Re: Bug#388701: Why Beryl has just four packages?

2007-04-24 Thread Alok G. Singh
On 24 Apr 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > What don't you put a personal server while we wait for them? or in > experimental? (a personal server would be better). If you just want a packaged beryl, the Beryl project have packaged it. deb http://debian.beryl-project.org etch main deb-src http://d