On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 2:14 PM, David Kalnischkies
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 12:09:37PM +0200, Alexander Thomas wrote:
>> I know, but this is a closed system and nothing is pulled in from
>> external repositories during this automated update. The stuff that is
>>
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06/08/2015 10:29 AM, Alexander Thomas wrote:
>> We
>> falsely assumed that setting DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive
>> APT_LISTCHANGES_FRONTEND=none, and using the -y and --force-yes
>> opt
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Konstantin Khomoutov
wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 16:25:21 +0200
> Alexander Thomas wrote:
>
> [...]
>> That would be an option, but it might still cause the same problem of
>> apt-get hanging as we currently experience when doing the upd
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Konstantin Khomoutov
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 3 Jun 2015 17:26:21 +0200
> Alexander Thomas wrote:
>
> [...]
> > The long story:
> >
> > We have a setup with multiple servers (running Wheezy). When booting,
> > the servers check wh
7;re doing might not be perfectly sane
and wonder whether it might have other risks.
We could avoid this 'init-inside-an-initscript' hack if someone had a
foolproof way of guaranteeing that the init script is always executed
as the very first in runlevel 2.
--
Alexander Thomas
--
To UNSU
5 matches
Mail list logo