Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A fixed libstdc++ package (0pre7) has been uploaded to incoming. You
> can get it from
>
> http://ftp-master.debian.org/~doko/gcc-3.3/
i've asked in the bug report i filed against the broken libstdc++ and
previously on the debian-gcc mailing list
Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 09:31:57PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > [Alex Romosan wrote:]
> > > which are not on by default and then i have to put the packages on
> > > hold because apt wants to get the remote ones.
&
Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 30 Aug 2000, Alex Romosan wrote:
>
> > can we please, please reverse the behaviour, or at least make it
> > configurable in /etc/apt/apt.conf, something like PreferLocal "yes".
> > if there is such an option
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It means the libc6 package you have installed has a different md5sum then
> the package it finds on ftp.corel.com, and assumes that the version on
> ftp.corel.com is a newer recompile. Strange logic, but that is how
> libapt-pkg thinks.
>
this is so
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 01:16:55PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> [snip]
> > [1] The makedepend program gets stuck in an infinite loop when attempting
> > to generate dependencies in xc/programs/xterm. One of Tom Dickey's
> > patches, #130 or #131, is probably the c
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I introduced a severe bug. Could you try the next prelimnary version
> and tell me if it works for you?
>
> ftp://ftp.infodrom.north.de/pub/people/joey/debian/sysklogd_1.3-29.2_i386.deb
>
well, i just tried 1.3-30 and it seems to work so far.
--alex
Alex Romosan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i just installed sysklogd 1.3-29.1 on one of my systems. i'll let you
> know if i have any problems with it or not. thanks.
>
well, i can't send any mail out, and there is nothing logged to
syslog. i can't su either. looks
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Would you like to test a pre-release of -30? Again, on my server
> it runs as expected. This release contains a patch against the
> former version.
>
> ftp://ftp.infodrom.north.de/pub/people/joey/debian/sysklogd_1.3-29.1_i386.deb
>
i just installed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Schulze) writes:
> sysklogd (1.3-29) unstable; urgency=low, closes=24893
> .
>* Re-Applied patch provided vom Topi Miettinen with regard to the people
> from OpenBSD. This provides the additional '-a' argument used for
> specifying additional UNIX domain
David Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 1998 at 12:27:17PM -0700, Alex Romosan wrote:
> > can somebody who know more about tcl (maybe even the tcl maintainer)
> > take a look at this? i appreciate any help. thank you.
>
> I (the Tcl maintainer) don&#
> I say everybody is too paranoid. Who cares what it looks like? Do
^
>it effectively and use the most common method, whoever's toes it steps on.
>Don't be afraid to put "he" because somebody will surely slander you for
>you
>Why dont u make a debian PAckage out of it? You can do one PAckage
>xteddy with an additonal command-line parameter to select the
>personality shown.
somebody else (Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) has already
expressed interest in packaging xteddy. i can share the pixmaps with
him though.
--a
i got bored so i replaced xteddy with the linux logo. voila! here
comes the new xpenguin. i still like my xteddy better, but if anybody
is interested, you can get xpenguin by anonymous ftp from
caliban.lbl.gov (you'll also find xteddy there).
--alex--
--
| I believe the moment is at hand when, b
> I have now fixed this in my sources. I would appreciate a bug
> report on things like this, since it was mere happenstance that I
> noticed this message. Expect an upgrade in a day or so.
>
i was going to do this eventually, i just first wanted to see what
other people thought about this. i
we got 4 new computers running debian (1.3.1) and in the process of
upgrading them to 2.0 i found the following problems:
(1) kernel-package doesn't know how to deal with spaces before the
block devices in the /etc/fstab file. i know you would say that
not many people would run into this s
i've run into a really strange problem, and i can't seem to figure it
out. i am attempting to link a program against Xpm and the linker
tells me it can't find it. this is the command:
g77 evtdsp_main.o xencode.o ../e815_analysis/dst/ftio.o getolevent.o \
getoesevent.o getofsevent.o sigonline.
go to http://www.npr.org/programs/atc/archives/1998/current.html and
listen to it.
--alex--
--
| I believe the moment is at hand when, by a paranoiac and active |
| advance of the mind, it will be possible (simultaneously with |
| automatism and other passive states) to systematize confusion
i finally got around to applying to become a debian developer. so i
want to announce here my intention to package the following programs:
f77reorder
f77 compiler script calling f2c/gcc. Handles some fortran 77
extensions by calling f77reorder to change the code.
vat
The LBNL audio tool, v
>OK, I've finished building an xteddy Debian Package and I'll take over
>maintainance when finished the procedure to become an official Debian
>maintainer. Did you plan to maintain XTeddy too or was your package only for
>private uses. I'm not intended to catch your job ;-).
good job. my xteddy
>1) xteddy
>
> Xteddy is a cuddly teddy bear for your X Windows desktop.
> It is more or less an excersise for package bundling and
> maintaining.
> In fact xteddy is a must have for any Linux distribution :-))
>
you can get an xteddy debian package by anonymous ftp from
caliban.lbl.gov in
i have a c++ program compiled with no debug flag. when i do an ldd on
the executable i get the following:
ldd ./vat
libtk8.0.so.1 => /usr/lib/libtk8.0.so.1 (0x4000f000)
libtcl8.0.so.1 => /usr/lib/libtcl8.0.so.1 (0x400af000)
libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x40115
21 matches
Mail list logo
