On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 10:24:04AM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> b) various packages already ignore s390x (gnome? others?)
WebKitGTK still builds in s390x, but the Skia graphics library does
not support big-endian machines so if the Cairo backend is ever
dropped then we probably won't be able
On Sun, Feb 04, 2024 at 11:05:46PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> In fact, none of the t64 binaries currently being uploaded
> to experimental have the final ABI either, we're just using
> experimental to clear binary NEW.
I was having a look at two of the packages that I maintain that have
t64 bi
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 10:00:35PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Here is the draft text that I added to the GObject-Introspection
> mini-policy in 1.78.1-11:
Hi, thanks for the explanation.
A couple of questions about this:
- Are packages that ship gobject-introspection files supposed to have
On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 02:18:10AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > In this case you need the portal in order to have access to the
> > font settings:
> IMHO, such explanations could be useful to users, who may wonder why
> xdg-desktop-portal-gtk is recommended or why some features are not
> avail
On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 01:03:57AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > It was actually due to a problem in Evolution that we made WebKitGTK
> > depend on xdg-desktop-portal (later downgraded to a recommendation):
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1845743
> > https://bugs.webkit.or
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 10:09:32PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > It looks like that's happening because atril depends on
> > WebKitGTK, a relatively complete web browser engine, which uses
> > xdg-desktop-portal to invoke per-user services across a sandbox
> > boundary (so that it can provide
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alberto Garcia
* Package name: cog
Version : 0.4.0
Upstream Author : The WPE WebKit Team
* URL : https://wpewebkit.org/
* License : MIT/Expat
Programming Lang: C
Description : Simple web browser based on WPE
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alberto Garcia
* Package name: wpebackend-fdo
Version : 1.3.0
Upstream Author : The WPE WebKit Team
* URL : https://wpewebkit.org/
* License : 2-clause BSD and Expat
Programming Lang: C++
Description : WPE
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alberto Garcia
* Package name: libwpe
Version : 1.3.0
Upstream Author : The WPE WebKit Team
* URL : https://wpewebkit.org/
* License : 2-clause BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : Base library for the WPE
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alberto Garcia
* Package name: wpewebkit
Version : 2.24.2
Upstream Author : The WPE WebKit Team
* URL : http://www.wpewebkit.org/
* License : mixed LGPL and BSD
Programming Lang: C, C++
Description : Web content
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 09:27:14AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> I'm getting the following lintian error message:
>
> E: e2fsprogs changes: orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature
> e2fsprogs_1.43.5.orig.tar.gz
>
> ... but I can't figure out how to get the changes file to include the
> original
On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 09:32:23PM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> > The good news is that the first kind of problems are detected and
> > fixed immediately, so waiting a couple of weeks before uploading
> > the releases to debian-security could be an option (is that what
> > Ubuntu does?).
>
> For t
On 2017-05-27 23:49, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> The "browser exception" applies to Chromium and Firefox, which are
> standalone packages (sans a few addons breaking), but unless webkit
> provides a long term branch with API stability guarantees, that's
> not a workable. "Rebase to a new 2.x branch
(I forgot to Cc debian-devel in my previous e-mail)
> > >NeoMutt is a sophisticated text-based Mail User Agent
> > >supporting MIME, GPG, PGP and threading.
> > >.
> > >NeoMutt was created when Richard Russon (FlatCap) took all
> > >the old Mutt patches, sorted through them, fi
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 04:32:59PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > Are there Debian Developers who happen to be travelling to
> > Toronto, Canada this spring and who would be up to meet briefly
> > for GPG key signing?
>
> The KVM Forum[1] will take place in Toronto this August, maybe some
> o
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 01:54:35AM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> you have the right to choose whether the situation that you are
> complicit in is something that you find acceptable or whether you do
> not. i leave it entirely to you to decide.
As a matter of fact we have already d
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:11:02AM +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> My proposal for the interim phase (however long that might be)
> is to provide symlinks in gir1.2-* packages that provide correct
> functionalities in Debian and downstream distros (such as described
> above), as well.
>
> /usr/lib/g
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alberto Garcia
* Package name: megatools
Version : 1.9.93
Upstream Author : Ondřej Jirman
* URL : http://megatools.megous.com
* License : GPL-2+ with OpenSSL exception
Programming Lang: C
Description : Command
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:02:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> * Package name: xemacs21
> Version : 21.4.22
Wasn't this removed just one month ago?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725883
Berto
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 04:30:59PM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> I found that the unar command from theunarchiver, which is even
> recommended by the FSF [3], can handle multipart, modern RAR
> archives just fine, only the command-line is incompatible to
> unrar-free and unrar-nonfree [4].
Not d
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 02:38:48AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> We've accumulated a lot of automake packages in main and since
> we're at the very beginning of the jessie release cycle I'd like
> to propose a mass bug filing to remove all the current automake
> packages in unstable (automake1.13 i
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:36:39AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > The debmake command invoked in the upstream source tree without
> > any option can generate template files which is good enough to
> > create a single arch=any Debian binary package for local use.
> This sounds almost exactly
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 05:22:25PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Matt Zagrabelny]
> > I've grepped the d-d list, but didn't find any threads regarding
> > fixing epochs in package versions.
>
> This does come up occasionally.
I was unaware of this thing and I'm sure I'm overlooking something,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alberto Garcia
* Package name: meiga
Version : 0.4.0
Upstream Author : Enrique Ocaña González
* URL : http://meiga.igalia.com/
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: Vala, C, Bash
Description : Light and easy
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alberto Garcia
* Package name: filetea
Version : 0.1.2
Upstream Author : Eduardo Lima Mitev
* URL : http://gitorious.org/filetea/filetea
* License : AGPLv3
Programming Lang: C, Javascript
Description : Web
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alberto Garcia
* Package name: event-dance
Version : 0.1.8
Upstream Author : Eduardo Lima Mitev
* URL : http://gitorious.org/eventdance/eventdance
* License : LGPLv3
Programming Lang: C
Description : Peer-to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alberto Garcia
* Package name: opense-basic
Version : 3.03
Upstream Author : Andrew Owen
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/sebasic/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Assembler (Z80)
Description : Free
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alberto Garcia
* Package name: fuse-emulator
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Philip Kendall
* URL : http://fuse-emulator.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL2
Programming Lang: C
Description : The Free Unix
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alberto Garcia
* Package name: fuse-emulator-utils
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Philip Kendall
* URL : http://fuse-emulator.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL2
Programming Lang: C
Description : ZX Spectrum
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alberto Garcia
* Package name: libspectrum
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Philip Kendall
* URL : http://fuse-emulator.sourceforge.net/libspectrum.php
* License : GPL2
Programming Lang: C
Description : ZX
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alberto Garcia
Package name: frogr
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Mario Sanchez Prada
URL : http://code.google.com/p/frogr/
License : GPL-3 / LGPL-3
Programming Lang: C
Description : Flickr Remote
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 04:45:26PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> All uploaded packages should always be build with the same compiler,
> the debian default gcc, unless a specific compiler is specified in
> rules.
>
> So I would say using cc is wrong.
Moreover, in the case of C++ (also ment
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 06:48:01AM -0600, William Pitcock wrote:
> > > > There definitely _is_ a major legal problem with the fork.
> > > Please provide specific details, rather than vaguely defined
> > > "major problems".
> > Read the related entry in the Debian bugtracking system before
> > aski
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:19:03AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > We still very regularly get installation reports where people use
> > lilo rather than grub, so it must still have a fairly significant
> > user base. I would say that the activity on the bug report shows
> > the same.
>
> OTOH, are
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:45:42AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Saying that something is GTK-based is probably meaningful for the
> average geek. It means nothing for the average user. This is what I
> call jargon.
>
> Our package descriptions should help all users to answer the simple
> que
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 05:57:21PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > "graphical GTK+-based client for Last.fm media service"
> > Is it necessary to say it's graphical provided that it's based on
> > GTK+?
> "GTK+" is jargon..:-)
Then we'd need to change quite a few package descriptions :-)
$
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 09:59:30AM +0100, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> > Also drop the leading article, of course
> > "graphical GTK+-based client for Last.fm media service"
>
> Is it necessary to say it's graphical provided that it's based on
> GTK+?
>
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 06:56:05AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Description : A GTK+-based Last.fm client
>
> "Last.fm" isn't really clear for anybody. I suggest using a more
> generic description and somehow say this is related to audio/media
> playing.
Well, you're right, I should
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alberto Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: vagalume
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Alberto Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://people.igalia.com/berto/
* License : GPL 3
Programming Lang: C
39 matches
Mail list logo
