Re: RFC round 5: DEP-3: Patch Tagging Guidelines

a DEP3-compliant > header but would that resolve your concerns? > > Is that really better over (auto-)duplicating those fields when needed? > > Anyway, I'd rather wait some time until people have tried using this > format before deciding if we must make some special case

Re: emacs23 uploaded to unstable

1 from > unstable/testing. > > Thanks > -- > Rob Browning > rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu > GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 > > -- Best regards, Adrian Perez signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Why YAML is not a good choice for Debian control files.

ylogenetic trees by parsimony using PHYLIP's dnapars/protpars >algorithm, by distance with NJ or BioNJ algorithms on a variety of > evolutionary >distances, or by maximum likelihood using the program PhyML 3.0. SeaView > draws >phylogenetic trees on screen or PostScript files, and allows to download >sequences from EMBL/GenBank/UniProt using the Internet. > > As you see, in terms of human readability and writability, YAML does not bring > advantages over the current format. > > I like YAML a lot, so if I overlooked something that would make it more > suitable, please let me/us know ! > > Have a nice week-end, > > -- > Charles Plessy > Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan > > -- Best regards, Adrian Perez signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: new package format

Hello. This may not be relevant in here, but I felt the need to ask. There's any plan of supporting another format - without breaking compatibility, I mean supporting - besides the RFC one? I think YAML would be a good one. IMHO there is stuff that could be somehow automated, then reviewed, but no

Re: Emacs 23.1 released

Sorry about the tone, you misunderstood me. What I'm actually saying is that I'm willing to do anything to get this quickly in unstable. I'll file the wishbug. Thanks for everything. On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 00:39 +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > Adrian Perez writes: > > &

Re: Emacs 23.1 released

-30 at 15:31 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Adrian Perez (30/07/2009): > > I'd like to see this in unstable ASAP. > > Get to work? > > Mraw, > KiBi. -- Best regards, Adrian Perez signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Emacs 23.1 released

rt. > > Many thanks to the rest of the Emacs development team for their hard > work; and to the numerous users who contributed suggestions and bug > reports. Happy hacking. > > > ___ > GNU Announcement mailing list > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnu -- Best regards, Adrian Perez signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

dh_nativejava warning

The latest lintian complains about dh_nativejava prepending paths to maintainer scripts. I wish to know what's the status of fixing this since it's affecting a package of mine. The bug report #511491 submitted a patch, I think. -- Best regards, Adrian Perez signature.asc Descrip

Re: libswt and eclipse

I'm CC-ing to debian-java. The package swt-gtk (3.4.2-1) was uploaded. -- Best regards, Adrian Perez signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: libswt and eclipse

ws as I can get ;). http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/swt-gtk -- Best regards, Adrian Perez signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: libswt and eclipse

at 23:03 +0200, Adnan Hodzic wrote: > Adrian, > > Are you planning to adopt both azureus and swt-gtk, or just swt-gtk? > > Adnan > > On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 15:12 -0400, Adrian Perez wrote: > > Ok, I was expecting to upload it later, but since I got the answers from &

Re: libswt and eclipse

him. Thanks for considering adopting swt-gtk and > azureus. They could use a maintainer that uses Azureus more frequently > than I do. > > Cheers, > Shaun > > 2009/6/25 Adrian Perez : > > Thanks for your reply. > > I know I could upload to mentors. But since it'

Re: libswt and eclipse

Thanks for your reply. I know I could upload to mentors. But since it's quite ethical to request the maintainer's feedback before adopting a package, I was asking because I have no way of establishing contact with him, since I've tried a lot in the last days. I'm currently doing some refinements,

libswt and eclipse

Hello list. I'm almost finished packaging libswt-gtk-3.4.2, since eclipse is orphaned and I've tried contacting libswt and azureus maintainer without results, I'm a pretty bit loss in here, since I want the new version be included in debian. Any tips? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-re