On Wed, 24 May 2006 07:41:04 -0500, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 12:10:43AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
>> Sure we could just have disclosed the license to -legal beforehand, but
>> then Sun probably would never talk to us about doing things like this
>> one again and just t
On Sun, 21 May 2006 23:25:28 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Adam Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Sun, 21 May 2006 20:20:09 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
>>> It's an important document and certainly something that every developer
>>> should read an
On Sun, 21 May 2006 20:20:09 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Adam Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> As Bill Allombert just pointed out, the Intention To Package process was
>> clearly subverted:
>> <http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.htm
On Sun, 21 May 2006 16:17:52 -0500, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> If Sun doesn't fix the license (and I don't think it is our work to fix
>
> The license is good enough for Debian (ftpmasters took their decisions).
> There's no fix to require, but it would be good to continue working them
> to enhanc
Hi A Mennucc1,
> I had actually asked for help on debian-legal, in
>
> [1]
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200301/msg00173.html
This and the follow-ups you have now received are great. It must be very
frustrating when so much time goes by that someone like myself misses
Hi Lucas Moulin,
> I've upgraded my system yesterday, and I've seen the problem you're
> talking about. Actually, I don't see any boot messages after "Setting up
> ICE socket...", but I see wdm starting, and I got the login prompt right
> after. That makes me think this is bootlogd related.
It is
Hi A Mennucc1,
> I just want to say that some time ago Dariush Pietrzak
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and I decided to package mplayer
>
> when we uploaded for the first time, the ftp-installer had some (good)
> reasons not to accept it
>
> so we went into it and tried to clear all possible problems w.r
Hi Geordie Birch,
> FWIW, I have version 2.85-5 of initscripts, sysvinit, and sysv-rc
> installed and am not having any problems re. terminal output.
Upon standard bootup into a terminal it appears that output ceases before
the INIT: Entering Runlevel : 2 message but will start up again if the
ke
Hi Geordie Birch,
>> > The bug is most likely caused by initscripts, sysvinit or sysv-rc. If
>> > you have upgraded you may wish to downgrade/wait for a fix before
>> > rebooting, especially if your computer doesn't automatically boot into
>> > X.
>>
>> I have confirmed that downgrading to initsc
Hi Geordie Birch,
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 06:14:01PM +1200, Adam Warner wrote:
>> I wrote:
>>
>> > The bug is most likely caused by initscripts, sysvinit or sysv-rc. If
>> > you have upgraded you may wish to downgrade/wait for a fix before
>> > rebo
I wrote:
> The bug is most likely caused by initscripts, sysvinit or sysv-rc. If
> you have upgraded you may wish to downgrade/wait for a fix before
> rebooting, especially if your computer doesn't automatically boot into
> X.
I have confirmed that downgrading to initscripts_2.85-4.1_all.deb
sys
Hi all,
Since upgrading to the latest unstable I have discovered that after my
startup reaches "Setting up X socket server directory ..." that I get no
further output at the terminal. I have confirmed this on two different
computers.
Neither the computers nor keyboards are locked up. I am able to
Hi Arnd Bergmann,
> On Tuesday 24 June 2003 02:00, Adam Heath wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
>> > In g++ 3.2, this code was distributed as "i386", and nobody noticed
>> > that it doesn't work on i386 for quite some time. In gcc 3.3, an
>> > implementation is provided that
Hi Bart Schuller,
>> sh: debian/rules: /usr/bin/make: bad interpreter: Permission denied
>
> chmod +x debian/rules
Of course! Thanks Bart and Daniel.
The resulting diff of debian/rules to compile in POSIX regular expression
support for CLISP is below.
28a29
> --with-module=rege
On Mon, 2001-09-10 at 22:01, Sander Smeenk (CistroN Medewerker) wrote:
> |Sep 10 11:54:05 replicator kernel: reiserfs_add_entry: Congratulations!
> |we have got hash function screwed up
So what kernel are you running Sander? There are data corruption bugs in
earlier 2.4 kernels.
In fstab are you
touch parent directories and files.
Regards,
Adam Warner
PS: I am extremely fortunate that I only lost program files in /usr :-)
I got to it before it took out my data files.
16 matches
Mail list logo
