On Wed, 2025-03-05 at 01:32 +0800, Blair Noctis wrote:
> On 04/03/2025 21:43, Marc Haber wrote:
> > On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 19:15:16 +0800, Blair Noctis
> > wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Honestly I never understood how exactly @p.d.o addresses work.
> > > Devref says it's "a simple email alias" that "provides
On Sun, 2024-08-18 at 14:23 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 11:02:03AM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> > Hi Stephen,
> >
> > On 18/08/2024 09:04, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> >
[...]
> > > If you can’t fix the build, you don’t need to exclude the
> > > architecture — you
> > > ca
On Sun, 2024-04-28 at 00:09 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> [As a general note, the primary contact point for possible mirror
> issues is mirrors@d.o, not debian-devel]
>
> On Sat, 2024-04-27 at 12:16 +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>
>
[...]
> > Further it seems mir
[As a general note, the primary contact point for possible mirror
issues is mirrors@d.o, not debian-devel]
On Sat, 2024-04-27 at 12:16 +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> it should be possible to reach archive.debian.org via rsync, however
> this fails for me. Is this intentional, or can this be fixe
On Fri, 2023-08-04 at 17:35 +0200, Sergio Talens-Oliag wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Sergio Talens-Oliag
>
> * Package name: tmpl
> Version : 0.4.0-1
> Upstream Author : krako
> * URL : https://github.com/krakozaure/tmpl
> * License : Exp
On Sun, 2022-09-25 at 15:42 -0500, Steven Robbins wrote:
> When I first started with Debian many many years ago, I would
> routinely see
> email for bug reports submitted against packages I maintain, and
> responses to
> said bugs. Nowadays I get essentially none of that. The only way I
> see s
On Fri, 2020-10-02 at 18:37 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> On 02-10-2020 17:05, Christian Kastner wrote:
> > I've stumbled another case in buster-backports [1], where Sources
> > has the following versions of src:libreoffice.
> >
> > Version: 1:6.3.4-2~bpo10+1
> > Version: 1:6.
On Wed, 2020-09-30 at 19:31 +0200, Roland Fehrenbacher wrote:
> a quick question to the list, since I didn't find an answer after a
> significant time of searching:
>
> Is it allowed to have a source package with a build dependency on a
> pkg in non-free (in this particular case nvidia-cuda-toolki
On Thu, 2020-09-17 at 09:55 +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Graham Inggs writes:
> > On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 at 09:18, Raphael Hertzog
> > wrote:
> > > Please reduce the severity of all the bugs that you opened to
> > > "normal" or "minor".
> >
> > Why?
>
> It does not violate the Debian Policy,
Tha
On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 14:52 -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2020-08-30 at 14:46, Richard Laager wrote:
[...]
> > (because there is no character code name for
> > experimental AFAIK).
>
> I thought the same at one point, but in fact, there is: it's called
> rc-buggy.
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/De
On Sun, 2020-08-16 at 15:51 +0200, Attila Szalay wrote:
> I have a relatively new package (BoxFort). In the beginning, I used
> the "any" architecture in the control so it was (tried to be)
> compiled on all architectures. But from the build logs, I
> realized that currently the package can only be
On Thu, 2020-08-06 at 15:48 -0500, Brian Smith wrote:
> The upload succeeds. I see the files sitting in
> ftp://ftp.upload.debian.org/pub/UploadQueue/. Eventually, I see the
> .changes file disappear and the remaining files are:
>
> libpsm2_11.2.185-1.debian.tar.xz
> libpsm2_11.2.185-1.dsc
> libps
On 2020-02-06 08:12, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi,
On 06-02-2020 00:07, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2020-02-05 at 22:42 +, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 10:22 PM Christian Barcenas
wrote:
Because this changes the versioning scheme from kernel releases
(libbpf-dev and libbpf0
On Wed, 2020-02-05 at 22:42 +, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 10:22 PM Christian Barcenas
> wrote:
> > Because this changes the versioning scheme from kernel releases
> > (libbpf-dev and libbpf0 currently are at 5.4.13-1 in sid) to libbpf
> > version numbers (0.0.6-1), the epo
On Tue, 2019-11-26 at 23:37 +, Samuel Henrique wrote:
> Hello debian-devel,
>
> TL:DR; What are the drawbacks of providing an rsync udeb (and
> am I right regarding the pros)?
>
> I would like to check in with you before moving on with this feature
> request.
>
> rsync: Please provide an rsy
On Fri, 2019-11-01 at 00:54 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-10-31 at 22:40 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Oct 31, Svante Signell wrote:
> >
> > > When elogind enters testing there would be many more people
> > > running
> > > Debian with sysvinit/elogind. elogind is needed for desk
On Thu, 2019-09-12 at 19:02 +0200, Jeff wrote:
> The package I uploaded yesterday failed to build[1]. In the buildd, 2
> of 1000+ tests failed. Of course, I built in a clean sbuild for sid
> before I uploaded it, and the same package built fine on the newer
> Ubuntu distros on launchpad. So I'm hop
On 2019-06-25 09:39, Paul Wise wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 2:08 PM Ansgar wrote:
Related to that I would like to be able to write something like
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian debian11 main
Already kind of possible:
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian Debian9.9 main
With the caveat tha
On Sun, 2019-04-14 at 17:52 +0400, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> I fixed bugreport #926567 [1], and I upload a binary.
> Apparently my upload was accepted [2], but the binary has not yet
> show up in Sid:
> I guess I missed something, or forgot something because I have not
> upload a binary
> since a long
On Sat, 2019-03-16 at 08:16 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat 16 Mar 2019 at 10:17AM +08, Paul Wise wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 6:06 AM Guillem Jover wrote:
> >
> > > $ deb-why-removed fossology
> >
> > I think this script would be a good addition to devscripts, could
> >
On 2019-02-25 08:20, Philipp Meisberger wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Philipp Meisberger
* Package name: libpam-fingerprint
Version : 1.5
Upstream Author : Philipp Meisberger
* URL :
https://github.com/philippmeisberger/pam-fingerprint
* License
On 2019-01-22 08:25, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
mattia@warren ~ % rmadison -S -s unstable muparser
libmuparser-dev | 2.2.6.1+dfsg-1 | unstable | amd64, arm64, armel,
armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mips64el,
mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
libmuparser-doc | 2.2.3-6| unsta
On 2018-11-27 08:18, Stephan Seitz wrote:
But I don’t want to get the /usr-merge forced upon my systems because
this minority is obviously too stupid to install the package and
migrate their systems on their own.
Please refrain from posting such messages; they are inappropriate and
contribute
On Sat, 2018-10-13 at 15:23 +0300, Tommi Höynälänmaa wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On 12.10.2018 04:40, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> > 2) Upstream uses "_" as the "NAME_VERSION" separator (instead of
> > "NAME-VERSION"). Your regex doesn't match that. Also, you have to
> > be
> > careful because upstream
On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 14:16 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> So, it's not always a purely technical decision whether a port
> remains a release architecture. It's also often highly political and
> somehow also influenced by commercial entities.
Please don't make implications like that unl
On Wed, 2018-09-12 at 22:34 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 08, 2018 at 08:18:10PM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> > ...
> > For example, in the Rust team, we have been discussing about
> > packaging fd (a find alternative developed using rust [1]).
> > We are planning to install it in /usr
On Sun, 2018-07-29 at 13:40 -0500, Jonathan Busby wrote:
> I have been having problems posting to this mailing list so I'm
> using
> pobox.com instead of my Gmail to see if that helps as per the
> listmaster's suggestion.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2018/07/msg00449.html arrived
fine y
On Sun, 2018-06-24 at 17:11 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-06-24 at 18:10 +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > What is the sequence of Debian release names?
> >
> > Which Debian web page contains such list?
> >
>
> Fairly predictably, https://www.d
On Sun, 2018-06-24 at 18:10 +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> What is the sequence of Debian release names?
>
> Which Debian web page contains such list?
>
Fairly predictably, https://www.debian.org/releases/
Regards,
Adam
On Sun, 2018-05-13 at 19:15 +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Hello debian-devel,
>
> IIRC do we agree that feedback is good.
>
>
> On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 04:51:54PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > [always CC the package maintainer when reassigning]
>
>
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2
On Sun, 2018-05-06 at 14:52 +0400, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello,
>
> my two last upload were successfully uploaded (yesterday and the day
> before),
> but they have not yet been precessed. The involved packages are: 4ti2
> and mpfrcxx.
> I suspect a keying issue. Is there a log where I can get mor
On Sun, 2018-02-11 at 12:25 +, Lumin wrote:
> For instance, package lua-torch-xlua[3]
> (= 0~20160719-g41308fe-4) is an Arch=all
> package which depends on lua-torch-torch7
> (arch=any). lua-torch-torch7 is shipped by
> testing, but lua-torch-xlua doesn't migrate[4].
> I tried to change Arch to
On Tue, 2017-12-26 at 19:27 +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 26 décembre 2017 10:03 -0800, Russ Allbery :
> This is the sort of thing that makes me feel like you have your
> > Lintian
> > settings turned up too high for the amount of nit-picking that you
> > want.
> > The spelling tags that apply
On Sat, 2017-10-14 at 12:59 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Bumping this as my mail to ftpmaster went unanswered.
>
> Could someone please remind me who to ask about the NEW Queue? It is
> causing
> me a FTBFS as I need this Build-Depends for an existing package which
> itself
> has reasonably
On 2017-08-03 14:21, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
So I can see multiple solutions
1) Debian includes nextcloud only in unstable and testing (probably
most
compatible with the nextcloud/owncloud business models, see also
https://
help.nextcloud.com/t/will-nextcloud-be-inviting-to-distribution-packages/
On 2017-06-19 8:51, Colin Ian King wrote:
Hi Adam,
On 18/06/17 12:14, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 08:41 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
What was the intent of this upload? If it was to try and get the
updated
package into the release, then a) it's (far) too late and
On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 08:41 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> What was the intent of this upload? If it was to try and get the updated
> package into the release, then a) it's (far) too late and b) it should
> have been discussed, not just uploaded to t-p-u.
Ping?
As you uploaded
On 2017-06-14 9:48, Ben Finney wrote:
For those who (like me) had difficulty with some of these steps, here's
how I eventually got it done:
Out of curiosity, which step(s)? They all seem fairly self-explanatory,
but I may well be missing something.
[...]
$ gpg --detach-sign \
--local-us
Hi,
On 2017-06-13 16:03, Colin King wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 15:23:11 +0100
Source: thermald
Binary: thermald
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.5.4-2.1
Distribution: stretch
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Colin King
Changed-By:
On 2017-06-01 22:29, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Jeremy Bicha
wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff
wrote:
You're best technical bet would be to upgrade to new webkit releases
in
stretch point releases, this would allow proper binNMUs and allow
pe
On Fri, 2017-04-14 at 19:05 +0200, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
wrote:
[...]
> So, it's up to us, to provide a better solution - just telling how bad
> systemd is, isn't just enought (from their perspective).
[...]
> If we get out of the ideologic war (including the upstreams, too),
> it wouldn
On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 11:05 +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
> I don't see the need to keep things in sync: If a new failure is
> detected, it creates an RC bug against the migration candidate, with an
> "affects" to the package that failed the test. The maintainer then has
> the possibilities:
>
> *
On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 21:01 +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quoting Ian Jackson (2017-01-09 18:33:51)
> > Johannes Schauer writes ("Re: Feedback on 3.0 source format problems"):
> > > Sbuild could do this cleanup itself if there was a way to
> > > automatically determine whether the user
On Wed, 2017-01-04 at 20:33 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 04.01.2017 um 19:53 schrieb Margarita Manterola:
>
> > Can we accelerate the removal of non key packages, please?
> >
> > One example: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libsigc++-1.2 migrated to
> > testing on Dec 29th even though it has a
On Fri, 2016-12-23 at 08:37 -0500, James McCoy wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 05:42:43PM -0500, Bill Blough wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 12:40:26PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > suffers rather from leaning toothpick syndrome. Does the
> > > `downloadurlmangle' support Perl's ability to h
On 2016-12-19 12:12, Johannes Schauer wrote:
Imagine you even directly build-depend on a virtual package. There is
currently
no way to somehow "reliably" always pick the same real provider of that
virtual
package.
I'm not sure how that isn't exactly what you're doing by depending on
"provide
On 2016-12-09 6:40, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi,
Something went wrong with this list. At least the following.
On 09-12-16 01:27, w...@debian.org wrote:
GNOME (#847411), orphaned yesterday
Bug Report URL: http://bugs.debian.org/847411
This bug is about:
gnome-btdownload, GNOME interface for
On 2016-12-08 13:08, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 01:41:38PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 08/12/16 13:35, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 01:02:20PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
[...]
I don't think that clearly addresses the case of alternative
dep
On Wed, 2016-12-07 at 19:59 +0100, Stéphane Blondon wrote:
> The home page has a note explaining the service does not really work.
> I tested it (with 'man' and 'uscan') and it works correctly. Perhaps I
> missed something but the note should be removed, no ?
Where?
Assuming that by "home page"
On 2016-11-28 23:07, Iustin Pop wrote:
On 2016-11-27 20:42:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
* The bug should be of severity "important" or higher
Quick question: assuming all the other conditions are met (minimal
patch,
clean debdiff, etc.), this seems to discourage normal bugs fixin
On 2016-11-28 23:43, Santiago Vila wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 03:11:17PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
On 2016-11-28 14:38, Holger Levsen wrote:
> thanks for this update!
>
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 08:42:26PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >* The update must be built in
On Wed, 2016-11-16 at 20:49 +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Hello,
>
> two days ago, syslog-ng 3.8.1-5 migrated to testing. However, as this
> package build-depends on libssl1.0-dev which is available in unstable
> only at the moment, it cannot be rebuild in testing.
[...]
> So, does anybody else
On Sun, 2016-11-13 at 11:28 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 07:37:00 +, Niels Thykier
> >"""
> >The release managers may make exceptions to these guidelines as they see
> >fit. *Such exceptions are not precedents and you should not assume that
> >your package has a similar excep
On Thu, 2016-11-10 at 10:34 +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I'm still confused, thinking that this Binary-Only-Changes field needs
> to be assembled into a file, called changelog.$arch, which is then put
> into the debian directory of the unpacked source package. (And which is
> then not included in
On 2016-10-18 9:52, SZ Lin wrote:
I think this situation meets the condition.
The case of two programs having the same functionality but different
implementations is handled via "alternatives" or the "Conflicts"
mechanism.
These two programs having the same functionality - implementation of
R
On 2016-10-17 16:04, Bart Schouten wrote:
I also want to just quickly summarize my position here, since some
very long posts were written on this and linked into the thread by
someone.
And you then wrote another very long post. We really don't need another
one.
Regards,
Adam
On Sun, 2016-10-09 at 21:12 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> [ adding debian-powerpc ]
>
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 06:54:44PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > Niels Thykier schrieb:
> > > If I am to support powerpc as a realease architecture for Stretch, I
> > > need to know that there are *active*
On Fri, 2016-09-30 at 19:04 +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> As for "porter qualification"
> =
>
> We got burned during the Jessie release, where a person answered the
> roll call for sparc and we kept sparc as a release architecture for
> Jessie. However, we ended up wit
On Sat, 2016-09-24 at 16:06 +0200, Bart Schouten wrote:
> Russ Allbery schreef op 24-09-2016 2:48:
> > The Wanderer writes:
[...]
> >> Some excuses are valid, mind. That doesn't mean they aren't excuses.
> >
> > I guess I'm finding it quite remarkable how much concerted effort seems
> > to
> > b
On 2016-09-19 12:28, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Adam D. Barratt , 2016-09-18, 11:28:
"Fixed in NMU" has not been a distinct state for several years, since
the introduction of BTS version tracking.
To clarify, the state still exists:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=fixed
On Sun, 2016-09-18 at 14:30 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 11:28:55 +0100, "Adam D. Barratt"
> wrote:
> > If your next maintainer upload includes the changelog stanza for the NMU
> > in its changelog then the BTS will automatically know that your upl
On Sun, 2016-09-18 at 16:01 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 02:25:13PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > That depends on what you mean by 'after'. If you mean 'with a greater
> > version', then the answer is no. The BTS parses changelogs to
> > determine whether a version c
On Sun, 2016-09-18 at 11:45 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 10:10:14 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> >With the BTS version tracking feature, acking NMUs is no longer needed
> >as the BTS tracks changelog heritage IIRC, so I'd not mention that in
> >the description.
>
> So when I do the f
On Tue, 2016-09-13 at 19:38 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> On 13.09.2016 18:25, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On 2016-09-13 12:55, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> >> On 09/13/2016 01:49 PM, Santiago Vila wrote:
> >>> You can't reproduce it, or you don't want to
On 2016-09-13 12:55, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 09/13/2016 01:49 PM, Santiago Vila wrote:
You can't reproduce it, or you don't want to reproduce it?
I added the tag because I couldn't reproduce the issue in unstable
where
we build our packages. It's great that it's reproducible in testin
On Sat, 2016-09-03 at 21:01 +0100, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote:
[stuff]
btw, I'm sure I'm not the only one irritated by this, but when replying
to a message it is conventional to indicate such in the Subject header
(e.g. with the addition of an "Re:"), unless one is changing the subject
- and
On Mon, 2016-08-29 at 13:12 +0300, Dmitrii Kashin wrote:
> Don Armstrong writes:
[...]
> > Policy is not a tool to beat developers with; it's a method of
> > documenting convention so that we can build a distribution of packages
> > which interact. Like most documentation of convention, it tends t
On Sat, 2016-08-27 at 12:07 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 09:36:12AM -0300, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
[...]
> > I think that jailkit just copies the permissions that Debian has set as
> > default for /bin which are different now according to the jailkit shell.
> >
> > There see
On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 18:39 +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 17:07 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > No. It shows that, two years ago, over 18,000 machines that were
> > reporting to the popcon servers had sysvinit-core installed and now
> > less
On 2016-08-26 16:26, Dmitrii Kashin wrote:
Marco d'Itri writes:
On Aug 26, Carsten Leonhardt wrote:
Considering the past conflicts on the topic of systemd, it should be
expected that there is a considerable user base that is staying with
sysvinit or another alternative.
Barely noticeable:
On 2016-08-26 13:15, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:06:25AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
[...]
I don't think that apt should step outside the configured priorities
without instruction from the user. Since apt doesn't currently
interact with the user (but aptitude does), it can
On 2016-08-25 10:44, Исаев Виталий wrote:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), cmake,
flatbuffers (= 1.2.0-1),
This has nothing to do with mk-build-deps. Given this:
➜ apt-cache policy flatbuffers
flatbuffers:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 1.4.0-17
Version table:
1.4.0-17 500
500 http://repo1
On 2016-08-10 12:55, Ian Jackson wrote:
Adam D. Barratt writes ("Re: use long keyid-format in gpg.conf (Re:
Key collisions in the wild"):
On 2016-08-10 11:39, Ian Jackson wrote:
> It would be much better to put out a stable release update to change
> the default. (Probabl
On 2016-08-10 11:39, Ian Jackson wrote:
It would be much better to put out a stable release update to change
the default. (Probably not a security update because of the risk of
causing currently-vulnerable scripts to become nonfunctional, which is
not something we normally do in security updates
On Tue, 2016-07-12 at 16:34 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> GNOME 3.22 will be released before squeeze freezes
That seems a little unlikely. :)
Regards,
Adam
On 2016-06-20 4:09, Simon Richter wrote:
Hi,
On 17.06.2016 09:31, Eugene Zhukov wrote:
The package is marked for autoremoval from testing, however the RC[1]
bug is reported against version in stable (testing has a newer
version, without a bug).
In this case, send a mail to cont...@bugs.debia
On 2016-06-08 10:45, Pirate Praveen wrote:
On Wednesday 08 June 2016 02:51 PM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 10:25:07AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
Thanks for the offer. It would be great if I have more hands to help
with
migrating git.debian.org
Whoah there. Running an of
[re-adding -devel to the CC]
On Mon, 2016-05-30 at 17:02 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-05-30 at 13:00 +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > * Package name: neomutt
> > Version : 20160502
> > Upstream Author : Richard Russon
> >
On Sat, 2016-05-14 at 10:01 +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> For future reference, we updated the release-notes after the Jessie
> release. Examples include:
>
> *
> https://www.debian.org/releases/jessie/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#systemd-sigkill-regression
>- Discovered post J
On Mon, 2016-05-09 at 21:44 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2016, at 20:42, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > * We are too few to write the release-notes to keep track of all the
> >relevant parts for a release.
> >- HELP IS VERY WELCOME!
>
> Can we make the entry barier to contribute t
Control: reassign -1 out-of-order 1.0-2
[BBCed to debian-devel for notification of the move]
On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 21:48 -0400, hillhopper.new wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
>
> --- Please fill out the fields below. ---
>
>Package n
On 2016-03-16 10:53, Mathieu Parent wrote:
Hello Joerg,
squeeze-lts on archive [1] has a Valid-Until header which makes apt
complain.
That's expected - see
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670141
Also, squeeze is still on security [2] and LTS is still on primary
miror [3]
On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 23:07 +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> My question is: why does it not just use dose3 just as the buildds
> are doing it?
How old is the dose codebase? The changelog.gz in the current Debian
package only goes back to 2012, which is more than a decade after
britney was origin
On Wed, 2015-12-16 at 16:18 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Description : some imaging codices for pixelmed DICOM image and ECG
> viewer
"Codices" is the plural of "codex"; you're looking for "codecs".
Regards,
Adam
On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 08:48 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> Julien Cristau writes:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 06:14:43 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> >
> > > If it's a “severe violation of Debian policy”, the bug is at least
> > > “serious” severity.
>
> This is one way that a bug can be determined “S
On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 13:09 -0800, Joshua R. Poulson wrote:
> Sorry, I assume you meant binary-only in context. It was certainly not
> our intent to ask for something like that.
Ah. I'm assuming that there's been a confusion of terminology here. A
binary package in this context is a package that a
On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 12:43 -0800, Joshua R. Poulson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Adam D.
> Barratt wrote:
> I assumed that there would have been a discussion - if only
> because
> adding a binary package to stable is a reasona
On Sun, 2015-11-22 at 21:53 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-11-22 at 21:34 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2015-11-22 at 20:45 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2015-10-18 at 12:35 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 17 Oct 2
On Sun, 2015-11-22 at 20:45 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-10-18 at 12:35 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> > On Sat, 17 Oct 2015 18:54:51 +0100
> > Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > It would be built from the linux-tools source package. We could
> > > cherry-pick more recent changes in tools/hv
On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 15:26 -0400, Pascal Giard wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
> > Josef Masek wrote:
> >
> >> it is possible to add package "vlan" to the DVD instalation images?
> >> It is tiny package (36kB) and in some special environment (without
> >> Internet wi
On Sat, 2015-09-12 at 22:31 +0300, Виталий Филиппов wrote:
> My sources.list contains sid, experimental and jessie-updates (+ oibaf
> graphics-drivers ppa)
That doesn't make a lot of sense. jessie-updates sits on top of
(predictably enough) Jessie and won't contain anything relevant for
unstable
On Tue, 2015-07-28 at 17:22 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Ole Streicher (2015-07-28 16:33:17)
> > Ben Hutchings writes:
> >> Installation of a package from the 'metapackages' section does *not*
> >> mark its dependencies as automatically installed.
> >
> > Really? So, if someone would i
On 2015-06-22 14:54, Hideki Yamane wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 15:41:30 +0200
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Then, which is better: jessie or jessie-proposed-updates?
> and {testing,stable,oldstable}-security and {stretch,jessie,wheezy}-security?
jessie and jessie-security.
Thanks Emilio,
On 2015-06-08 13:41, Craig Small wrote:
I'm trying to work out what would be the best way forward for this.
mudlet has an icon, mudlet.svg which had a cc-by-nc-sa license.
I reported it to upstream who basically said "oh yeah, we stuffed up,
not sure how it got there, fixed now".
Do I need to
On 2015-04-20 13:47, Paul Wise wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Peter Spiess-Knafl wrote:
The crash of browser could be affected through the following bug in
libcairo: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767858
There is already a patch available, which Tobi and I verified
On 2015-03-25 11:22, Andile Ntebe wrote:
We have Apache/2.2.22 on our Debian boxes.
Ive tried using apt-get update and apt-get upgrade to try and get us
onto the latest version but with no success. Is there any other way
that we could get Apache updated?
I have to admit I'm confused at this po
On 2015-03-25 7:12, Gareth Webb wrote:
Passive-aggressive?
I was merely asking from a security perspective
I assume Ondřej was referring to "if we need to move over to a new
distribution that has this updated version of PHP". That's a fairly
strong opening gambit for "merely asking", particu
On Sat, 2015-02-14 at 19:55 +0100, Ross Gammon wrote:
> * Package name: netcdf-python
> Version : 1.1.3
> Upstream Author : University Corporation for Atmospheric Research/Unidata
> * URL : http://unidata.github.io/netcdf4-python/
How does this differ from the existing
On 2015-02-12 19:59, Riley Baird wrote:
In any case, even if there is interest in closing this bug, it is
definitely more of a long-term thing and is unlikely to be fixed before
the jessie release. Because of this, would it be okay to mark it as
"jessie-ignore"?
For reference, as per https://ww
On 2015-01-19 11:31, Wookey wrote:
I recall looking at that list for the 'maintainer and submitter'
option, and being disappointed not to find one. Am I right that the
only way to expliticly mail the submitter and the maintainer is to
look the submitter's mail up in the initial bugrep and just CC
1 - 100 of 351 matches
Mail list logo
