Re: To the aqualung NMUer....

2009-03-10 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Adeodato Simó a écrit : * "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" [Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:42:43 +0100]: I bet it won't work for a package in dak ;) http://incoming.debian.org http://packages.qa.debian.org/aqualung It didn't appear neither on incoming nor on pts. And, FFS, the A

Re: To the aqualung NMUer....

2009-03-10 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Simon Huggins a écrit : On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 10:10:13PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: 1. Don't spam devel to contact just one person. For reference, who-uploads from devscripts is useful for working out who NMU'd something. Simon I bet it won't work for a package in dak ;) Ad

Re: To the aqualung NMUer....

2009-03-09 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Don Armstrong a écrit : On Mon, 09 Mar 2009, Barry deFreese wrote: That was me. I haven't posted the diff for the NMU yet. Just to underline here, you need to send the diff for the NMU to the bug(s) that you are fixing in the NMU *before* uploading the NMU. In the case where a 0-day N

Re: To the aqualung NMUer....

2009-03-09 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Barry deFreese a écrit : Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: Hello, I just received a DAK acknowledgement for aqualung 0.9~beta9.1-1.1 but it's not me who prepared this package. I guess it's a NMU fixing the ffmpeg/libavcodec issue but I can't found any related message neither on

To the aqualung NMUer....

2009-03-09 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Hello, I just received a DAK acknowledgement for aqualung 0.9~beta9.1-1.1 but it's not me who prepared this package. I guess it's a NMU fixing the ffmpeg/libavcodec issue but I can't found any related message neither on the BTS nor on debian mailing lists (-devel and -release). I would have

To the aqualung NMUer....

2009-03-09 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Hello, I just received a DAK acknowledgement for aqualung 0.9~beta9.1-1.1 but it's not me who prepared this package. I guess it's a NMU fixing the ffmpeg/libavcodec issue but I can't found any related message neither on the BTS nor on debian mailing lists (-devel and -release). I would have

Bug#473235: ITP: divfix++ -- repair broken AVI file streams by rebuilding index part of file

2008-03-29 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Package name: divfix++ Version: 0.29 Upstream Author: Erdem U. Altinyurt URL: http://divfixpp.sourceforge.net/ License: GPL v2 or later Description: This program designed to repair bro

Re: Orphaned packages with quite some users

2007-10-31 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Cyril Brulebois a écrit : > Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (31/10/2007): > >> Bernd Zeimetz wrote: >> >> http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/xmms-crossfade.html >>> If I remember right gtk-1 is supposed to be removed from lenny, so >>> xmms will be gone, too. >>> >> Yes

Bug#447410: ITP: libmowgli -- Development framework for C

2007-10-20 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Package name: libmowgli Version: 0.5.0 Upstream Author: Atheme Project URL: http://www.atheme-project.org/projects/mowgli.shtml License: ISC Description: Mowgli is a development framework for C (like GLib), which provides

wxwidgets 2.8 needs help !

2007-10-04 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Hello developers, I'm writing you this mail to be sure everybody is aware of this issue and with the hope that someone will be interrested in fixing it ;) wxWidgets has been released a long time ago and we're still missing it. wx2.8 has been packaged for Ubuntu [1] so most of the initial packagi

Re: Considerations for 'xmms' removal from Debian

2007-08-12 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
William Pitcock a écrit : > Julien BLACHE debian.org> writes: > >> I think you need at least an Intel HDA card to reproduce that problem, >> as it's probably the driver that presents something weird to the >> lib. Might even need a MacBook with the same setup :| >> >> I'll see on another machine

Re: Considerations for 'xmms' removal from Debian

2007-07-10 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Joseph Neal a écrit : > On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:09:35 +0200 > "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Xmms-shn was last updated March 28th 2007. I personally have about >>> 40 hours of zappa boots in shn format that would only be playab

Re: Considerations for 'xmms' removal from Debian

2007-07-09 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Joseph Neal a écrit : Well, my reasoning was, that we just try to wild guess about user capabilities. I have just learned that user behave very unexpected and exactly these users happen to be quite vocal how broken Debian is. I just would like to give them lesser chances to be correct when they

Re: Bug#431482: Considerations for 'xmms' removal from Debian

2007-07-03 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Do you mean having the right audacious-plugins dependency on audacious wouldn't be enough ? Adeodato Simó a écrit : > * Steve Langasek [Tue, 03 Jul 2007 12:25:11 -0700]: > >> But at a minimum, yes, the audacious-plugins package should be depending on >> libaudacious by way of shlibdeps. > > Ther

Re: Bug#431482: Considerations for 'xmms' removal from Debian

2007-07-03 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Adeodato Simó a écrit : * "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" [Tue, 03 Jul 2007 08:46:45 +0200]: Hi Steve, (My name is not Steve.) Wasn't talking to new or mistake. I really hate circular depency and I'm not sure it's the better way. Well, do as Joss said

Re: Considerations for 'xmms' removal from Debian

2007-07-03 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Joseph Neal a écrit : Most of this packages are xmms plugins. Maintainers will need to port them to xmms2 or bmpx, or they should be removed. Other packages just depend on xmms as a mere multimedia player, and therefore we recommend the maintainers to adjust their dependencies to bmpx, xmms2 or

Re: Bug#431482: Considerations for 'xmms' removal from Debian

2007-07-02 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Hi Steve, I really hate circular depency and I'm not sure it's the better way. In fact, audacious is broken in testing for ages and forcing a build of mcs on mipsel would fix all that crap... Adeodato Simó a écrit : * Russ Allbery [Mon, 02 Jul 2007 14:39:20 -0700]: Steve Langasek <[EMAI

Re: Considerations for 'xmms' removal from Debian

2007-07-02 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
I (audacious maintainer) have some stuff to add about xmms plugins. Most of them have been merged into audacious and I worked with xmms-crossfade maintainer to build an audacious flavour of this plugins. We should have a look at all xmms-plugins but I'm pretty sure more then 90% are already pa

Re: Uploading wxWidgets 2.8 to experimental ?

2007-05-27 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
Hi, I already built wx2.8 from ubuntu on my debian lenny for testing purpose. It build and works fine, I have been able to get latest filezilla running without any issues. I would be really happy if you could upload it to unstable, then I'll help fixing bugs if I can and can help you to keep i

Re: packages newer in Ubuntu than in Debian (reduced false positives)

2007-05-10 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bart Martens a écrit : > On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 08:14 +0200, Bart Martens wrote: >> On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 23:16 -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote: >>> [Bart Martens] I've thought about adding an column for the versions in experimental, but that is

Re: packages newer in Ubuntu than in Debian

2007-05-01 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bart Martens a écrit : > Hi Package Maintainers (DD's and non-DD's), > > Now that Etch is released to stable, many package maintainers have > already updated their packages to the newest upstream releases. That is > of course very good. > > However,

Bug#360524: ITP: audacious -- A fork of beep-media-player

2006-04-02 Thread Adam Cécile
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Adam Cécile" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: audacious Version : 0.2.3 Upstream Author : William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mohammed Sameer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.audacious