On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 11:24:59PM +0200, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
> Le mer. 2 juil. 2025 à 17:35, Chris Hofstaedtler a écrit :
> > > Without any particular hat: I would expect someone wanting to drop cron
> > > to come up with some analysis of what remains to be done and what is
> > > going to br
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: наб
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: wg-netns
Version : 2.3.5
* URL : https://github.com/dadevel/wg-netns
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Create network namespace
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 09:30:09AM -0600, Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
> It's worth noting that Lubuntu is currently shipping Picom by default.
> I don't think you're proposing getting rid of it, but if that ends up
> being considered, I'd prefer if it could be kept around or if the
> Lubuntu team could a
Hi!
We seem to be shipping 3.5 standalone compositors
(maintainers in CC):
1. xcompmgr ‒ the upstream's effectively finished
(we have 1.1.8, the two releases since changed nothing of
substance)
last maintainer upload 2019-07
popcon inst=852 vote=171
2. co
On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 07:29:19AM -1000, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 05:37:59PM +0200, наб wrote:
> > idk if you got a notification (the confirmation mail would indicate
> > otherwise?), but the patch is at #1085590. I've tested it to behave
> >
On Sun, Nov 17, 2024 at 11:21:00AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2024-11-17 at 03:22 +0100, наб wrote:
> > src:pth has been gone from testing since August.
> > There are no rdeps and no rbuilddeps,
> > and only FTBFS bugs since like 2012.
> > I can hardly imagi
Hi!
src:pth has been gone from testing since August.
There are no rdeps and no rbuilddeps,
and only FTBFS bugs since like 2012.
I can hardly imagine a point to Pth at all in 2024
(or any time after ubiquitous pthread support),
so it reads to me like an easy QA removal.
But, this seems incongruent
hing material.
I started writing this to propose some sort of hoisting,
but this no longer appears feasible. Ah well.
Best,
наб
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
imed after
https://github.com/cybernoid/archivemount/issues/29
but early 2021 is not much different to excess deaths from late 2020 :/).
Has anyone seen Yann Amar?
наб
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 10:44:46AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 02:13:05PM +0200, наб wrote:
> > I've implemented this but can't test it fully because
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/ext2/e2fsprogs.git
> > is missing an up-to-d
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 10:53:29PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 04:56:05PM +0200, наб wrote:
> > ...but now that I look at this there's fuse2fs,
> > which is naturally better than some third-party implementation.
> >
> > The int
Hi!
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 02:08:47PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-10-22 at 00:00:21 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2024-10-21 at 00:49 +0200, наб wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 11:39:36PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > On Sun,
On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 11:39:36PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2024-10-20 at 20:03 +0200, наб wrote:
> > I'd like to use an epoch so I'm asking for consensus per policy 5.6.12.
> >
> > As part of the Salvage Team's trixie view-os removal plan ‒
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: наб
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Control: block -1 by 1085457
* Package name: fuse-ext2
Version : 0.0.11
Upstream Contact: Alper Akcan
* URL : https://github.com/alperakcan/fuse-ext2
* License : GPL-2
https://github.com/alperakcan/fuse-ext2
instead of src:fuse-umfuse-ext2.
The current version of src:fuse-umfuse-ext2 in sid is 0.4-1.5,
and the current version of https://github.com/alperakcan/fuse-ext2 is 0.0.11,
so src:fuse-ext2 would need to be version 1:0.0.11-1 to update right.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: наб
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libcurlfs
Version : 0
Upstream Contact: наб
* URL : https://sr.ht/~nabijaczleweli/libcurlfs
* License : 0BSD
Programming Lang: C++
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: наб
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: snappy-tools
Version : 0
Upstream Contact: наб
* URL : https://sr.ht/~nabijaczleweli/snappy-tools
* License : 0BSD
Programming Lang: C++
Description
17 matches
Mail list logo
