Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Aryan Karamtoth
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-r...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: rust-micromath
Version : 2.1.0
Upstream Author: Tony Arcieri
* URL : https://github.com/tarcieri/micromath
* License
On Friday, July 18, 2025 5:59:06 AM Mountain Standard Time NoisyCoil wrote:
> It's complicated, and nuanced. These complications and nuances do not
> apply to your package, which is the subject of this thread.
The complication and nuance of this entire discussion is what fascinates me
and why I t
Hi,
On 7/19/25 05:16, Marc Haber wrote:
I would like to build differnt "flavors", lets call them linux-server,
linux-vm, linux-desktop and linux-notebook. But I'd like to have them
from - at least - the same .orig.tar.gz, just for the reason that this
file is about 150 MB large.
That's what
On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 02:17:50PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
Marc Haber wrote:
I would like to build differnt "flavors", lets call them linux-server,
linux-vm, linux-desktop and linux-notebook. But I'd like to have them
from - at least - the same .orig.tar.gz, just for the reason that this
fil
Le vendredi 18 juillet 2025, 22:28:28 heure d’été d’Europe centrale Ahmad
Khalifa a écrit :
> On 18/07/2025 21:16, Marc Haber wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to re-work my linux kernel building process and would like
> > to do it right this time: Build a clean source package that dak and
> >
Am 18.07.25 um 23:17 schrieb Josh Triplett:
Marc Haber wrote:
I would like to build differnt "flavors", lets call them linux-server,
linux-vm, linux-desktop and linux-notebook. But I'd like to have them
from - at least - the same .orig.tar.gz, just for the reason that this
file is about 150 MB l
Marc Haber wrote:
> I would like to build differnt "flavors", lets call them linux-server,
> linux-vm, linux-desktop and linux-notebook. But I'd like to have them
> from - at least - the same .orig.tar.gz, just for the reason that this
> file is about 150 MB large.
Is there a reason to have multip
On 18/07/2025 21:28, Ahmad Khalifa wrote:
On 18/07/2025 21:16, Marc Haber wrote:
Hi,
I would like to re-work my linux kernel building process and would
like to do it right this time: Build a clean source package that dak
and sbuild will accept. I do not plan to upload this to Debian, but I
t
On 18/07/2025 21:16, Marc Haber wrote:
Hi,
I would like to re-work my linux kernel building process and would like
to do it right this time: Build a clean source package that dak and
sbuild will accept. I do not plan to upload this to Debian, but I think
that we all can learn from some discus
Hi,
I would like to re-work my linux kernel building process and would like
to do it right this time: Build a clean source package that dak and
sbuild will accept. I do not plan to upload this to Debian, but I think
that we all can learn from some discussion.
I would like to build differnt "
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bastien Roucaries
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: php-bcncommerce-json-stream
Version : 0.4.2
Upstream Contact: https://github.com/skolodyazhnyy
* URL : https://github.com/skolodyazhnyy/json-stream
* L
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Eric Berry
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libjitterentropy
Version : 3.6.3
Upstream Contact: Stephan Mueller
* URL : https://www.chronox.de/jent/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Descr
On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 05:10:16PM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
As you have been told by multiple people: Your package has been subject
to a decision by a delegate with authority to decide the matter in
question. You have been advised as to your options and the appropriate
venues for doing so.
Since this is about a very horrible sin like... jokes!... you are out of luck.
This is a crime of the highest levels.
If you would have instead raped multiple children in the ages of 7yo and 9yo,
into a state where they can't piss anymore, that would be different.
Then you would be welcome and pro
Hi Salvo,
Am Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 04:43:38PM +0200 schrieb Salvo Tomaselli:
> Without me debian would be shipping fascist and racist quotes like it
> has done for the past 22 years, yet somehow I'm the bad guy.
I want to stress again — as I tried to do in private — that I don’t
consider you the b
Hello,
> As you have been told by multiple people: Your package has been subject
> to a decision by a delegate with authority to decide the matter in
> question. You have been advised as to your options and the appropriate
> venues for doing so.
Apparently I deeply misunderstand how debian works.
Hi Salvo,
You have sent mail about this matter to debian-devel@ 14 times in the
last 48 hours or so, and with your most recent message you cast
aspersions about other developers being "completely ok" with things,
putting words into their mouths. This is unacceptable.
As you have been told by
Hello,
> Just to set the discussion basis: we're talking about datasets of quotes that
> are *not* relevant to making Debian stable a technically excellent release.
Some people do have .bashrc scripts that this change will break.
Similar changes have already broken my .bashrc scripts before.
>
Hello,
> As I understood it from a previous message, during his clean-up work,
> the maintainer found a quote where beating women is encouraged. What did
> he do then? He left it in the package!
I even found a quote which says that killing children by cracking
their skulls on rocks is good, but i
On 18/07/25 00:41, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
Hello,
You do understand fortunes-{it,scn}-off is not a sacred text?
You do understand that suggesting that killing kids is good is
extremely disturbing to most people?
Me included.
To answer your question directly, no, I will not be opening an RC
On 18/07/25 14:25, Marco d'Itri wrote:
You may not be aware of this, but many people reject the idea that some
text or object should be considered "sacred".
I am aware, I am an atheist and agree with that viewpoint. Thank you.
On Jul 18, NoisyCoil wrote:
You do understand fortunes-{it,scn}-off is not a sacred text?
You may not be aware of this, but many people reject the idea that
some text or object should be considered "sacred".
Hence arguing that a text containing some seriously disturbing passages
is all right
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, moel...@debian.org
* Package name: python-modelcif
Version : 1.4
* URL : https://github.com/ihmwg/python-modelcif
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: Python
D
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Don Xu
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: librust-base62-dev
Version : 2.2.1
Upstream Contact: François Bernier
* URL : https://github.com/fbernier/base62
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Rust
On 18/07/25 at 11:29 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> > The issues are very very very obviously not RC issues if they have
> > been there for 22 years without anyone noticing.
>
> Wrong: they are now, as per the Release Team decision. Sorry to repeat this,
> but a delegate has made an explici
(Dropping the CC'list to just d-devel)
Just to set the discussion basis: we're talking about datasets of quotes that
are *not* relevant to making Debian stable a technically excellent release.
Also, a Release Team member has written the following¹:
> With my Release Team hat on (…) Please drop t
On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 10:10:42AM +0200, Stephan Seitz wrote:
> Am Fr, Jul 18, 2025 at 03:01:44 -0400 schrieb Tiago Bortoletto Vaz:
> > obvious issue is being overlooked by some here. Debian will not only
> > lose one user of the offending package as already inaccurately argued in
> > this thread,
Am Fr, Jul 18, 2025 at 03:01:44 -0400 schrieb Tiago Bortoletto Vaz:
obvious issue is being overlooked by some here. Debian will not only
lose one user of the offending package as already inaccurately argued in
this thread, but contributors and developers who simply won't have the
motivation to gi
Russ Allbery writes:
> A careful debian-devel observer could
> have listed most of the people who would respond to the thread and written
> a pretty good paraphrase of what they would say the moment they saw the
> first few messages in the thread.
FWIW I believe you do it better and better for e
On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 11:12:14AM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
[...]
>
> The package maintainer has already explained that he has the same general
> feeling. There are some things he has already removed from the package
> because he feels they are inappropriate for Debian. He has also express
30 matches
Mail list logo
