Source: libasyncns
Version: 0.8-6
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: Tanguy Ortolo , Tanguy Ortolo
, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, 862...@bugs.debian.org,
862...@bugs.debian.org, Package Salvaging Team
Hi Tanguy,
Your package libasyncns was highlighted in the Bug of the Day[1]
initiative, whic
X-Debbugs-Cc: rust-deb...@lists.debian.org
Hi, i am the the author of
https://bugs.debian.org/1107258
When trying to package the project, i noticed the project has to vendor a
dedicated dependency (magpie) which has to vendor nvtop v3.2.0 and apply
application specifc patches to try to make an
On Sat, Jun 07, 2025 at 08:38:09PM +, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jun 07, 2025 at 09:08:50PM +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> > apt-cacher-ng is simply almost dead upstream/unmaintained, having just one
> > release/maintainer upload since 2021 and many open bugs, including several
>
Hi,
I became Fedora/Redhat maintainer for this to revive it a bit and have a
more efficient to feed the Debian nodes.
It annoys our "security" team at work who sees plain http traffic. (No they
don't know what gpg means) In https mode from my understanding there is no
caching at all which defeats
Hi,
On Sat Jun 7, 2025 at 10:38 PM CEST, Andy Smith wrote:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2025 at 09:08:50PM +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
apt-cacher-ng is simply almost dead upstream/unmaintained, having just one
release/maintainer upload since 2021 and many open bugs, including several
very well known p
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 07, 2025 at 09:08:50PM +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> apt-cacher-ng is simply almost dead upstream/unmaintained, having just one
> release/maintainer upload since 2021 and many open bugs, including several
> very well known problems affecting many people.
What are people usin
On Sat, Jun 07, 2025 at 03:46:48PM +, Tim Woodall wrote:
Maintaining a package is a significant commitment. I'd prefer
newcomers to fix bugs instead. There it doesnt hurt when they vanish
after a few months.
And, when you "just" fix bugs, you don't have to the next
frustrating threadmill
On Wed, 4 Jun 2025, Marc Haber wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 06:22:49PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I suggest to instead more narrowly guide them towards *recent* *RFP*
bugreports rather than WNPP bugreports in general.
It will not surprise me if some newcomers find recent RFP bugrepo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carsten Schoenert
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-pyinstrument
Version : 5.0.2
Upstream Contact: Joe Rickerby
* URL : https://github.com/joerick/pyinstrument
* License : BSD-2, BSD-3, M
9 matches
Mail list logo
