The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 1179 (new: 2)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 129 (new: 0)
Total number of packages reques
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Arthur Diniz
* Package name: golang-k8s-sigs-apiserver-network-proxy
Version : 0.33.0-1
Upstream Author : kubernetes-sigs
* URL : https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/apiserver-network-proxy
* License : Apache-2.0
Program
On 05/06/2025 21:48, Richard Lewis wrote:
Andrey Rakhmatullin writes:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 08:51:38PM +0100, Richard Lewis wrote:
Consider this random new contributor's experience:
1. Go to https://www.debian.org/, click on "Get Involved, Contribute"
2. Read https://www.debian.org/deve
On 05/06/2025 21:30, Soren Stoutner wrote:
On Thursday, June 5, 2025 10:53:17 AM Mountain Standard Time Ahmad Khalifa
wrote:
Looks like you took over maintainership completely. Not that you
provided help and collaborated with the original maintainer.
This looks more like a package that should h
Andrey Rakhmatullin writes:
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 08:51:38PM +0100, Richard Lewis wrote:
>>> Consider this random new contributor's experience:
>>>
>>> 1. Go to https://www.debian.org/, click on "Get Involved, Contribute"
>>> 2. Read https://www.debian.org/devel/join/, points you to "WNPP"
>>
On Thursday, June 5, 2025 10:53:17 AM Mountain Standard Time Ahmad Khalifa
wrote:
> Looks like you took over maintainership completely. Not that you
> provided help and collaborated with the original maintainer.
>
> This looks more like a package that should have been orphaned long ago
> when it
Ahmad Khalifa writes:
> Consider this random new contributor's experience:
>
> 1. Go to https://www.debian.org/, click on "Get Involved, Contribute"
> 2. Read https://www.debian.org/devel/join/, points you to "WNPP"
>
> Of course, this is my opinion, but it's debian's primary journey from
> the
On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 08:51:38PM +0100, Richard Lewis wrote:
Consider this random new contributor's experience:
1. Go to https://www.debian.org/, click on "Get Involved, Contribute"
2. Read https://www.debian.org/devel/join/, points you to "WNPP"
Of course, this is my opinion, but it's deb
c.bu...@posteo.jp writes:
> for the folsk not involved with Debian GNU/Linux but monitoring it as
> journalists for example I have to ask.
thanks for trying to help, but the email you replied was aimed at an
audience that understands terms like DFSG and SPI. If you want to
critique documents, th
On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 08:41:30AM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
I typically load one of these two pages and use my browser’s find-on-page
functionality to search them.
https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/being_packaged
https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/requested
There's also https://wnpp.debian
On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 02:58:24PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
I have recent evidence of 2 newcomers complaining about wasting time on
RFH bugs. Do you have recent evidence of anyone benefiting from RFH bugs?
Yes, I recently adopted Courier (and related packages) because it had a RFH
bug.
*h
On 04/06/2025 22:58, Soren Stoutner wrote:
On Wednesday, June 4, 2025 6:05:25 AM Mountain Standard Time Ahmad Khalifa
wrote:
On 04/06/2025 13:50, Julien Plissonneau Duquène wrote:
Le 2025-06-04 13:56, Ahmad Khalifa a écrit :
Because they're misleading and waste contributor time.
I don't thin
On Thursday, June 5, 2025 4:26:10 AM Mountain Standard Time Holger Levsen
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 11:51:37PM +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> > Not much, in my experience, because the only reliable way to find WNPP
bugs
> > for given software is, in my experience, Google.
>
> And soo
On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 08:41:30AM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> Not much, in my experience, because the only reliable way to find WNPP
bugs
> for given software is, in my experience, Google.
And soon it will be s#Google#AI#. I think this tells more about you than
about Debian or WNPP bugs.
On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 05:04:34PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> OpenAI has an Open Source fund. Maybe Debian should apply[1] for a grant
> so that Debian contributors could get hands-on experience on how this
> could help their Debian activities?
or maybe Debian should not.
--
cheers,
On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 11:51:37PM +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> Not much, in my experience, because the only reliable way to find WNPP bugs
> for given software is, in my experience, Google.
And soon it will be s#Google#AI#. I think this tells more about you than
about Debian or WNPP bugs.
On Wed, 2025-06-04 at 18:33 +0100, Ahmad Khalifa wrote:
> On 04/06/2025 18:28, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 06:13:57PM +0100, Ahmad Khalifa wrote:
> > > > And, when you "just" fix bugs, you don't have to the next frustrating
> > > > threadmill that we offer: looking for a
17 matches
Mail list logo
