Re: debian/upstream/metadata (Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference)

2025-05-26 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Mon 26 May 2025 at 01:13pm +02, Julien Plissonneau Duquène wrote: > Hi, > > Le 2025-05-21 14:45, Sean Whitton a écrit : >> It's meant to be kept up-to-date. If it's a dead link, it should be >> deleted. > > The way it is currently specified in this appendix of Debian Policy [1] reads:

Re: debian/upstream/metadata (Re: git branches vs debian specific git tools (Re: RFC for changes regarding NMU in developers reference)

2025-05-26 Thread Julien Plissonneau Duquène
Hi, Le 2025-05-21 14:45, Sean Whitton a écrit : It's meant to be kept up-to-date. If it's a dead link, it should be deleted. The way it is currently specified in this appendix of Debian Policy [1] reads: an explanation of where the upstream source came from Note "where [it] came from",

Bug#1106567: ITP: libwebservice-dropbox-perl -- interface to Dropbox for Perl

2025-05-26 Thread Andrew Ruthven
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andrew Ruthven X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: libwebservice-dropbox-perl Version : 2.09 Upstream Contact: Shinichiro Aska * URL : https://metacpan.org/pod/WebService::Dropbox * License : Arti

Re: Package statistics by downloads

2025-05-26 Thread Julien Plissonneau Duquène
Hi, I would be interested in per-package-and-version download statistics and trends as well. Le 2025-05-03 09:28, Philipp Kern a écrit : The problem is that we currently do not want to retain this data. You're absolutely right here, there is no point in retaining the raw data, it gets sta