Bug#1106208: ITP: moonlight-qt -- GameStream client for PCs

2025-05-20 Thread Jianfeng Liu
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jianfeng Liu X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: moonlight-qt Version : 6.1.0 Upstream Contact: Cameron Gutman * URL : https://moonlight-stream.org/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: C++ Descr

Re: Private code: to forge, or not to forge?

2025-05-20 Thread Otto Kekäläinen
On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 at 10:42, Daniel Baumann wrote: > > On 10/16/24 18:18, Iustin Pop wrote: > > Gitea/Forgejo are common recommended solutions for "home hosting", but > > neither is packaged. > > (jftr) I'm currently working with Forgejo upstream to get one last > feature implemented that we'll

Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper

2025-05-20 Thread Soren Stoutner
On Tuesday, May 20, 2025 7:15:19 AM Mountain Standard Time Roland Mas wrote: > I've read all the feedback on this ITP, and will take it into account, > including the renaming part. I'm uncomfortable with withdrawing it > altogether, but I propose to sit on it for a few weeks, at least long > enough

Re: The Debian Mono "Team" needs help

2025-05-20 Thread Aaron Rainbolt
On Tue, 20 May 2025 16:06:25 +0200 Antoine Le Gonidec wrote: > Mono was orphaned last year, and I took over its maintenance because > I rely on it to run some non-free video games (not redistributable, > so not packaged into Debian), so I can unvendor the Mono runtime > shipped with these games a

Re: [git-buildpackage] Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper

2025-05-20 Thread Guido Günther
Hi Otto, On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 02:13:29PM -0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > Hi, > > > > * Package name: gwh > > > Version : 0.6.14 > > > Upstream Contact: Roland Mas > > > * URL : https://salsa.debian.org/lolando/gwh > > > * License : GPL-3+ > > > Programming

Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper

2025-05-20 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 07:59:31PM +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: I'm deeply concerned that the "surface area" of Debian packaging tools is too large already for new folk, and adding something like gwh into the archive makes that problem worse. Fair enough, although I'm hoping to make gwh goo

Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper

2025-05-20 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 04:15:19PM +0200, Roland Mas wrote: I'm deeply concerned that the "surface area" of Debian packaging tools is too large already for new folk, and adding something like gwh into the archive makes that problem worse. Fair enough, although I'm hoping to make gwh good enough

Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper

2025-05-20 Thread Mechtilde Stehmann
Hello, Am 20.05.25 um 12:07 schrieb Jonathan Dowland: I'm deeply concerned that the "surface area" of Debian packaging tools is too large already for new folk, and adding something like gwh into the archive makes that problem worse. I would really like to see an effort to improve gbp itself d

Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper

2025-05-20 Thread Roland Mas
Le 20/05/2025 à 12:07, Jonathan Dowland a écrit : I'm deeply concerned that the "surface area" of Debian packaging tools is too large already for new folk, and adding something like gwh into the archive makes that problem worse. Fair enough, although I'm hoping to make gwh good enough to encapsu

The Debian Mono "Team" needs help

2025-05-20 Thread Antoine Le Gonidec
Mono was orphaned last year, and I took over its maintenance because I rely on it to run some non-free video games (not redistributable, so not packaged into Debian), so I can unvendor the Mono runtime shipped with these games and use the Debian-provided runtime instead. What this means is that my

Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper

2025-05-20 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 01:03:47PM +0200, Mechtilde Stehmann wrote: I'm deeply concerned that the "surface area" of Debian packaging tools is too large already for new folk, and adding something like gwh into the archive makes that problem worse. I would really like to see an effort to improve

Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper

2025-05-20 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 20/05/25 at 16:27 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: > On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 11:07:03AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > I'm deeply concerned that the "surface area" of Debian packaging tools > > is too large already for new folk, and adding something like gwh into > > the archive makes that

Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper

2025-05-20 Thread Mechtilde Stehmann
Hello, Am 20.05.25 um 13:32 schrieb Andrey Rakhmatullin: On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 01:03:47PM +0200, Mechtilde Stehmann wrote: I'm deeply concerned that the "surface area" of Debian packaging tools is too large already for new folk, and adding something like gwh into the archive makes that probl

Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper

2025-05-20 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 11:07:03AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: I'm deeply concerned that the "surface area" of Debian packaging tools is too large already for new folk, and adding something like gwh into the archive makes that problem worse. I would really like to see an effort to improve g

Re: Bug#1106057: ITP: gwh -- git-buildpackage workflow helper

2025-05-20 Thread Jonathan Dowland
I'm deeply concerned that the "surface area" of Debian packaging tools is too large already for new folk, and adding something like gwh into the archive makes that problem worse. I would really like to see an effort to improve gbp itself directly at least first. Have you tried to do that? F