Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jianfeng Liu
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: moonlight-qt
Version : 6.1.0
Upstream Contact: Cameron Gutman
* URL : https://moonlight-stream.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Descr
On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 at 10:42, Daniel Baumann wrote:
>
> On 10/16/24 18:18, Iustin Pop wrote:
> > Gitea/Forgejo are common recommended solutions for "home hosting", but
> > neither is packaged.
>
> (jftr) I'm currently working with Forgejo upstream to get one last
> feature implemented that we'll
On Tuesday, May 20, 2025 7:15:19 AM Mountain Standard Time Roland Mas wrote:
> I've read all the feedback on this ITP, and will take it into account,
> including the renaming part. I'm uncomfortable with withdrawing it
> altogether, but I propose to sit on it for a few weeks, at least long
> enough
On Tue, 20 May 2025 16:06:25 +0200
Antoine Le Gonidec wrote:
> Mono was orphaned last year, and I took over its maintenance because
> I rely on it to run some non-free video games (not redistributable,
> so not packaged into Debian), so I can unvendor the Mono runtime
> shipped with these games a
Hi Otto,
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 02:13:29PM -0700, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > * Package name: gwh
> > > Version : 0.6.14
> > > Upstream Contact: Roland Mas
> > > * URL : https://salsa.debian.org/lolando/gwh
> > > * License : GPL-3+
> > > Programming
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 07:59:31PM +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
I'm deeply concerned that the "surface area" of Debian packaging
tools is too large already for new folk, and adding something like
gwh into the archive makes that problem worse.
Fair enough, although I'm hoping to make gwh goo
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 04:15:19PM +0200, Roland Mas wrote:
I'm deeply concerned that the "surface area" of Debian packaging
tools is too large already for new folk, and adding something like
gwh into the archive makes that problem worse.
Fair enough, although I'm hoping to make gwh good enough
Hello,
Am 20.05.25 um 12:07 schrieb Jonathan Dowland:
I'm deeply concerned that the "surface area" of Debian packaging tools
is too large already for new folk, and adding something like gwh into
the archive makes that problem worse.
I would really like to see an effort to improve gbp itself d
Le 20/05/2025 à 12:07, Jonathan Dowland a écrit :
I'm deeply concerned that the "surface area" of Debian packaging tools
is too large already for new folk, and adding something like gwh into
the archive makes that problem worse.
Fair enough, although I'm hoping to make gwh good enough to encapsu
Mono was orphaned last year, and I took over its maintenance because I rely on
it to run some non-free video games (not redistributable, so not packaged into
Debian), so I can unvendor the Mono runtime shipped with these games and use
the Debian-provided runtime instead.
What this means is that my
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 01:03:47PM +0200, Mechtilde Stehmann wrote:
I'm deeply concerned that the "surface area" of Debian packaging
tools is too large already for new folk, and adding something like
gwh into the archive makes that problem worse.
I would really like to see an effort to improve
On 20/05/25 at 16:27 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 11:07:03AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > I'm deeply concerned that the "surface area" of Debian packaging tools
> > is too large already for new folk, and adding something like gwh into
> > the archive makes that
Hello,
Am 20.05.25 um 13:32 schrieb Andrey Rakhmatullin:
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 01:03:47PM +0200, Mechtilde Stehmann wrote:
I'm deeply concerned that the "surface area" of Debian packaging
tools is too large already for new folk, and adding something like
gwh into the archive makes that probl
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 11:07:03AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
I'm deeply concerned that the "surface area" of Debian packaging tools
is too large already for new folk, and adding something like gwh into
the archive makes that problem worse.
I would really like to see an effort to improve g
I'm deeply concerned that the "surface area" of Debian packaging tools
is too large already for new folk, and adding something like gwh into
the archive makes that problem worse.
I would really like to see an effort to improve gbp itself directly at
least first. Have you tried to do that?
F
15 matches
Mail list logo
