On 18/04/25 23:17, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Thu Apr 17, 2025 at 7:23 PM BST, Simon Josefsson wrote:
I noticed that Fedora 42 was released and their docker images lack a
'awk' tool.
They likely lack perl, as well. Most/all awk usage in maintainer scripts
could probably be replaced with perl.
On Thu Apr 17, 2025 at 7:23 PM BST, Simon Josefsson wrote:
I noticed that Fedora 42 was released and their docker images lack a
'awk' tool.
They likely lack perl, as well. Most/all awk usage in maintainer scripts
could probably be replaced with perl. But, if you are in the minimizing
game, pe
El 17/4/25 a las 21:03, Colin Watson escribió:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 08:40:42PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
Installed size of mawk is 263 MB which is really small for today's standards.
KB rather than MB, thankfully!
Big oops! I wonder how small they want images to be to
consider 263 KB un
On 2025-04-17 Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Following up on my previous post.
>> How about adding simpler versioned depends (no pre-depends) with pre-rm
>> script?
> I am talking about tricks using the "dpkg-maintscript-helper
> symlink_to_dir ..." command. Any thought?
[deleting drafted response]
This
Hi
Currently rakudo cannot be shipped on arm architectures because of build
issues. Upstream is working in this, but in the meantime, raku is not suitable
for ARM.
I've required the removal of moarm, nqp and rakudo from unstable/arm*, which
was done a few days ago.
But I forgot that all raku-
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 08:23:18PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Is it possible to drop 'mawk' from the set of default tools in trixie?
Regardless of the practical and important questions others raised on why
and how to actually do it, no change like this could be done responsibly
at this point
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 02:52:17PM +0800, Sean Whitton wrote:
On Thu 17 Apr 2025 at 08:02pm -05, Richard Laager wrote:
So, personally, I think getting mktemp(1) added to POSIX would be
better for portability in the long run anyway.
Eventually. POSIX.1-2017 is going to be the thing to target f
Hello,
On Thu 17 Apr 2025 at 03:51pm -04, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> Our goal was to have an image that wasn't unique (or suprising) to a
> Debian project member -- rather, IMVHO, the package(s) should be added
> or removed from the minbase set via our usual conventions.
This makes sense.
In thi
8 matches
Mail list logo
