Hello,
On Thu 17 Apr 2025 at 08:02pm -05, Richard Laager wrote:
> So, personally, I think getting mktemp(1) added to POSIX would be
> better for portability in the long run anyway.
Eventually. POSIX.1-2017 is going to be the thing to target for a long
time, I think.
GNU m4 doesn't follow POSIX
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian-Java team
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-j...@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: jmh
Version : 1.37
Upstream Contact: OpenJDK Community
* URL : https://op
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 03:51:15PM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 11:27:22AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > awk is in the essential set in Debian, so this would be a very substantial
> > amount of work.
>
> {Docker image comaintainer hat on}
>
> This is right. More specifi
Hi Simon,
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 08:23:18PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> I noticed that Fedora 42 was released and their docker images lack a
> 'awk' tool. Debian trixie images ship with 'mawk' pre-installed right
> now. While I'm not convinced the removal game is necessarily a good
> one, I
> I uploaded on Monday using the ssh-upload target. Have you tried that
> one?
No I just tried regular dput, but it seems to have started working again now.
--
Salvo Tomaselli
"Io non mi sento obbligato a credere che lo stesso Dio che ci ha dotato di
senso, ragione ed intelletto intendesse ch
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Facundo Acevedo
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org
* Package name : ffuf
Version : 2.1.0-1
Upstream Author : https://github.com/ffuf
* URL : https://github.com/ffuf/ffuf
* License : Ex
On 2025-04-17 19:44, Sean Whitton wrote:
m4 is the only way POSIX.1-2017 defines to safely create a temporary
file (outside of writing and compiling a C program).
I was not aware of using m4 for this, so that piqued my interest.
I think the newer
POSIX standard has not improved on this partic
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 at 19:41, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Installed size of mawk is 263 MB which is really small for today's standards.
Isn't that bad for the Debian minimal images for containers?
I'm not too familiar with how we generate our container images but I can see
mawk there and Debian is us
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Debian trixie images ship with 'mawk' pre-installed right now. While
> I'm not convinced the removal game is necessarily a good one, I can
> see that it does have some advantages. Is it possible to drop 'mawk'
> from the set of default tools in trixie? If not, what are t
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 11:27:22AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
awk is in the essential set in Debian, so this would be a very substantial
amount of work.
{Docker image comaintainer hat on}
This is right. More specifically -- the Debian docker images are
(intentionally) -- "just" `debootstrap --
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 08:40:42PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
Installed size of mawk is 263 MB which is really small for today's standards.
KB rather than MB, thankfully!
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
Hi
I noticed that Fedora 42 was released and their docker images lack a
'awk' tool. Debian trixie images ship with 'mawk' pre-installed right
now. While I'm not convinced the removal game is necessarily a good
one, I can see that it does have some advantages. Is it possible to
drop 'mawk' from
El 17/4/25 a las 20:27, Russ Allbery escribió:
Simon Josefsson writes:
I noticed that Fedora 42 was released and their docker images lack a
'awk' tool. Debian trixie images ship with 'mawk' pre-installed right
now. While I'm not convinced the removal game is necessarily a good
one, I can see
Simon Josefsson writes:
> I noticed that Fedora 42 was released and their docker images lack a
> 'awk' tool. Debian trixie images ship with 'mawk' pre-installed right
> now. While I'm not convinced the removal game is necessarily a good
> one, I can see that it does have some advantages. Is it
Hi,
Following up on my previous post.
> How about adding simpler versioned depends (no pre-depends) with pre-rm
> script?
I am talking about tricks using the "dpkg-maintscript-helper symlink_to_dir ..."
command. Any thought?
Osamu
On Thu, 2025-04-17 at 20:40 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
I now see this as a bug. I think this was caused by my post-bookworm change in
debian-reference (2.109) on Mon, 18 Dec 2023.
If I remember correctly, the intent of this change was to move all
HTML/PDF/Plain_Text document to a path under /usr/share/doc/ for better policy
compliance.
This r
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 09:45:53AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > > I wish reproducible-builds people would activate DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck
> > > for the second build, I think it would help. I don't think anybody will
> > > use that as an excuse to file more RC bugs.
> > They mentioned earlier
El 17/4/25 a las 9:21, Paul Gevers escribió:
Hi,
On 16-04-2025 19:59, Santiago Vila wrote:
I wish reproducible-builds people would activate DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck
for the second build, I think it would help. I don't think anybody will
use that as an excuse to file more RC bugs.
They mentio
Hi,
On 16-04-2025 19:59, Santiago Vila wrote:
I wish reproducible-builds people would activate DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck
for the second build, I think it would help. I don't think anybody will
use that as an excuse to file more RC bugs.
They mentioned earlier on IRC that they'll do just that
19 matches
Mail list logo
