Hi,
On Wed, 2025-04-16 at 07:27 +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Yes that seems likely. I think that the decision in other distributions
> may have had more to do with aligning interests with organization who
> fund them, though.
This is moving into conspiracy theory territory... We can as well
On 2025-04-16 Simon Josefsson wrote:
[...]
> Was invoking the system library exception discussed or decided on
> project-wide in Debian? I tried to find some earlier discussion around
> this, and while many discussions is possible to find, I don't see any
> conclusions.
Good morning,
iirc it ca
Michael Stone writes:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 03:38:38PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>>I believe that is a fairly new (~5 years?) approach within Debian.
>>Debian used to treat OpenSSL incompatible with GPLv2 and that all code
>>that link to OpenSSL has to have a GPL+OpenSSL exception. Does
On 14/04/2025 1:59 pm, Henrik Ahlgren wrote:
Pirate Praveen writes:
Didn't OpenSSL switch license to Apache 2.0 and now compatible with
GPL? What am I missing here?
https://gplv3.fsf.org/wiki/index.php/Compatible_licenses#GPLv2-incompatible_licenses
Thanks, so only GPL v3/v2+ is compatible,
On 2025-04-15 at 05:58:42, Ansgar 🙀 wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> As Git doesn't seem any different, I think we should close this bug.
I agree with you that we should close the bug, which I did a few minutes
ago. I provided slightly different reasons in the close message, but I
agree this would cause a lo
Hi Paul,
I used the release notes to upgrade a bookworm system to a trixie system. I
like the new layout of the release notes, thanks for the layout upgrade :-)
Overall it went very well, for the only real issue I run into, I filed a bug
report:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b
On Sun, Apr 13, 2025 at 10:45:56PM +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> I am not a Debian developer, therefore I cannot create a pull request for
> fixes
> in the release notes myself,
You absolutely can. One does *not* need to be a Debian Developer to send
patches to the Debian BTS, or to create merg
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 03:38:38PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
I believe that is a fairly new (~5 years?) approach within Debian.
Debian used to treat OpenSSL incompatible with GPLv2 and that all code
that link to OpenSSL has to have a GPL+OpenSSL exception. Does anyone
recall how and when thi
Ansgar 🙀 writes:
> No, that is not the core problem. Debian, like most other binary
> distributions, heavily relies on the system library exception in many,
> many places.
I believe that is a fairly new (~5 years?) approach within Debian.
Debian used to treat OpenSSL incompatible with GPLv2 and
On 2025-04-14 11:10, Russ Allbery wrote:
I do find it fairly hard to understand the logic behind a position that
somehow our git-remote-https binary as distributed is a derived work of
OpenSSL and thus violates the GPLv2 license based on the nature of this
specific dependency chain, but then I wa
Hi,
On Mon, 2025-04-14 at 16:18 -0500, Richard Laager wrote:
> On 2025-04-14 11:10, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > I do find it fairly hard to understand the logic behind a position that
> > somehow our git-remote-https binary as distributed is a derived work of
> > OpenSSL and thus violates the GPLv2 li
11 matches
Mail list logo
