Hi,
you might want to consider bringing up what you think are problems with sbuild
on on the Debian BTS of sbuild instead of d-devel unless you think that this
topic deserves wider discussion. I put the relevant bug in CC. Maybe drop
debian-devel@lists.debian.org unless you think that this issue d
Hi,
It seems that something changed in the last month or so with sbuild such
that when building a package, it now seems to run dpkg-checkbuilddeps
_outside_ the chroot and will fail all the build deps aren't installed.
Is there a way to avoid this behavior, other than by using
--no-clean-sou
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniel Swarbrick
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: golang-github-bougou-go-ipmi
Version : 0.7.2-1
Upstream Contact: Bougou Nisou
* URL : https://github.com/bougou/go-ipmi
* Li
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 03:21:04PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> Michel,
>
> On Thursday, February 13, 2025 2:36:26 PM MST Michel Lind wrote:
> > Ah, OK, so these uploads all require FTP master review right?
> >
> > - soname bump to 0.5.5 in experimental
> > - initial upload of the new pykdumpfi
Michel,
On Thursday, February 13, 2025 2:36:26 PM MST Michel Lind wrote:
> Ah, OK, so these uploads all require FTP master review right?
>
> - soname bump to 0.5.5 in experimental
> - initial upload of the new pykdumpfile in experimental
> - dropping python bindings in experimental
> - 0.5.5 with
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 09:23:49AM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 12/02/2025 23:57, Michel Lind wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > libkdumpfile has recently released version 0.5.5, which despite the
> > version number, actually contains an soname bump from 0.5.4
> >
> > https://github.com/pt
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 08:34:07PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Hi Santiago,
> It would probably be helpful to also share the result of somehow running
> the compiled list through dd-list, to raise attention for involved
> maintainers.
I want to say: yes. :) please do.
--
cheers,
Ho
Hi,
On 13-02-2025 20:21, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
Any thoughts?
You might also want to somehow take activity on the package into
account. E.g. cacti (that I am nearly the only uploader for) has seen an
update for CVE's only last week. I don't think I need (nor would I
appreciate) more
Hi,
Le 28/12/2024 à 15:21, Guillem Jover a écrit :
In this case (filesystem snapshotting), I do think dpkg is (currently at
least) really the wrong place, for at least the following reasons:
In addition, I do not see how snapshotting of full FS can be correctly
supported, unless all other
On 2025-02-13 16:21:10 -0300 (-0300), Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
[...]
> So, this is a call for comments: is this kind of package list useful?
[...]
The main problem I see is that the list includes projects who
backport security fixes to stable branches, so for example
python-keystonemiddleware
Le 12/02/2025 à 05:57, Simon Richter a écrit :
Hi,
On 2/12/25 13:38, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote:
["DSO missing from command line"]
I suspect that the problem is the order in which the -latomic is added to the
linker flags?
Yes.
Because if instead of target_link_options() with
Hi Santiago,
Quoting Santiago Ruano Rincón (2025-02-13 20:21:10)
> Here attached you can find a list of packages that have ever had a
> security issue **and** whose packaged version is not "up to date",
> according to the uscan results. It is sorted by the number of currently
> open CVEs in sid (t
Dear Debian fellows,
I am writing this email under the hypothesis that having the latest (or
longest supported) upstream version in the next release will: 1. make it
easier to provide security support during the whole release lifecycle,
and 2. it will be useful for users, as they could have the la
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Martina Ferrari
* Package name: ergochat-ldap
Version : 0.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Shivaram Lingamneni
* URL : https://github.com/ergochat/ergo-ldap
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Go
Description : LDAP a
On 12/02/2025 23:57, Michel Lind wrote:
Dear all,
libkdumpfile has recently released version 0.5.5, which despite the
version number, actually contains an soname bump from 0.5.4
https://github.com/ptesarik/libkdumpfile/releases/tag/v0.5.5
See e.g. the relevant Fedora packaging change
https://s
15 matches
Mail list logo
