Bug#1089490: ITP: ibus-varnam -- IBus engine for Varnam input method

2024-12-07 Thread Subin Siby
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Subin Siby X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, m...@subinsb.com * Package name: ibus-varnam Version : 1.6.4 Upstream Contact: Subin Siby * URL : https://github.com/varnamproject/govarnam-ibus * License : MPL

Re: Simpler git workflow for packaging with upstreamless repositories

2024-12-07 Thread Holger Levsen
On Sat, Dec 07, 2024 at 10:39:43PM +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: > No, there is clearly no consensus on unifying any workflows. Everyone > thinks their workflow is superior and canneeds to stay. I agree with the first sentence but I think the 2nd sentence is too much drama. Those many workflo

Re: Simpler git workflow for packaging with upstreamless repositories

2024-12-07 Thread Alec Leamas
On 07/12/2024 14:34, Andrea Pappacoda wrote: It seems that we're all agreeing on trying to unify our different workflows as much as possible. Why do we have `git deborig`, `gbp export-orig`, `origtargz`, etc.? Couldn't we decide to unify on a single "front end" command, which chooses different

Re: Simpler git workflow for packaging with upstreamless repositories

2024-12-07 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Sat, Dec 07, 2024 at 02:34:20PM +0100, Andrea Pappacoda wrote: > Hi all, I've tried catching up with the whole thread, but didn't fully yet. > So excuse me if this has been asked/answered before. > > On Tue Dec 3, 2024 at 3:40 AM CET, Sean Whitton wrote: > > Then just make one: 'git deborig'. >

Re: Should l10n packages be Recommends or Suggests?

2024-12-07 Thread Philipp Kern
On 12/6/24 6:40 AM, Helmut Grohne wrote: > I no longer buy the argument for conserving space when a typical NixOS > installation takes 100GB and people are happy with it. As long as we > provide the mechanisms to trim installations, those who need to conserve > space should be doing the work of opt

Re: Simpler git workflow for packaging with upstreamless repositories

2024-12-07 Thread Andrea Pappacoda
Hi all, I've tried catching up with the whole thread, but didn't fully yet. So excuse me if this has been asked/answered before. On Tue Dec 3, 2024 at 3:40 AM CET, Sean Whitton wrote: Then just make one: 'git deborig'. I appreciate not everyone is happy with this, but it solves the problem.

Re: Should l10n packages be Recommends or Suggests?

2024-12-07 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Ted, On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 01:28:11PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > In the case of e2fsprogs, server and container image *really* don't > have any need of translations --- and in fact, from my perspective, > it's often actively harmful, when users send me e2fsck logs in > Vietnamese and I hav

Bug#1089218: ITP: node-svgdotjs-svg.draggable.js -- plugin for the library node-svgdotjs-svg.js

2024-12-07 Thread Georges Khaznadar
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Georges Khaznadar X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: node-svgdotjs-svg.draggable.js Version : 3.0.4 Upstream Author : Wout Fierens * URL : https://github.com/svgdotjs/svg.draggable.js * License :