Hi,
On 12/4/24 23:37, Stefano Rivera wrote:
I don't think this can be entirely outside-in, the package needs to say
how much ram it needs per-core, to be able to calculate the appropriate
degree of parallelism. So, we have to declare a value that then gets
calculated against the proposed parall
On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 06:08:00PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I wonder if we should reconsider the default assumption of package
> ownership. Instead, we could introduce a file, such as
> debian/dont_touch_my_package (or a similarly named file), where
> maintainers can document their reasons for
On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 03:30:23PM -0800, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> It would be great to have a group of DDs that are willing to regularly
> check for RFS bugs / mentors.d.n and offer sponsorship
Sure. This is true since the beginning of the RFS process, and as nothing
stops people from doing this, but
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Josenilson Ferreira da Silva
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, nilsonfsi...@hotmail.com
* Package name: python-proton-vpn-api-core
Version : 0.38.2
Upstream Contact: Proton AG
* URL : https://github.com/ProtonVPN/pyth
Hello,
On Tue 03 Dec 2024 at 12:04am -08, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> And by "aren't uploadable" you mean this is how you designed it and
> chose to not use signatures, not that doing it would inherently would
> be impossible. Would it by any chance be possible to extend "git
> deborig" to check whe
Hi!
On Wed, 2024-12-04 at 14:37:45 +, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi Guillem (2024.12.04_13:03:29_+)
> > > Are there other layers that could reasonably be used to implement a more
> > > general form of parallelism limiting based on system RAM? Ideally, we'd
> > > consolidate these implementati
On Wed, 2024-12-04 at 22:07 -0300, Leandro Cunha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 9:20 PM Phil Wyett wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2024-12-04 at 20:41 -0300, Leandro Cunha wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 8:30 PM Xiyue Deng wrote:
> > > > P.S. I would also like to take this
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 9:20 PM Phil Wyett wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2024-12-04 at 20:41 -0300, Leandro Cunha wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 8:30 PM Xiyue Deng wrote:
> > > P.S. I would also like to take this chance to appreciate Phil Wyett's
> > > automatic RFS checking that adds "co
On Wed, 2024-12-04 at 20:41 -0300, Leandro Cunha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 8:30 PM Xiyue Deng wrote:
> > P.S. I would also like to take this chance to appreciate Phil Wyett's
> > automatic RFS checking that adds "confirmed" tag to RFS bugs that passed
> > the checks, which helps ens
On Wed, 2024-12-04 at 15:30 -0800, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> Andreas Tille writes:
>
> > Am Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 10:46:03PM +0500 schrieb Andrey Rakhmatullin:
> > > On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 10:39:52AM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> > > > I have directed several RFS (Request For Sponsor) towards appropri
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 8:30 PM Xiyue Deng wrote:
> P.S. I would also like to take this chance to appreciate Phil Wyett's
> automatic RFS checking that adds "confirmed" tag to RFS bugs that passed
> the checks, which helps ensure a minimum quality of a prepared package
> ready for sponsorship
Andreas Tille writes:
> Am Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 10:46:03PM +0500 schrieb Andrey Rakhmatullin:
>> On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 10:39:52AM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
>> > I have directed several RFS (Request For Sponsor) towards appropriate
>> > teams,
>> > when then exist. However, my personal exp
Andreas Tille writes:
> I wonder if we should reconsider the default assumption of package
> ownership.
(This is a reas objective, but) i wasnt sure how the following text would
achieve the above)
> Instead, we could introduce a file, such as
> debian/dont_touch_my_package (or a similarly named
On Wednesday, December 4, 2024 2:30:05 PM MST Richard Lewis wrote:
> Soren Stoutner writes:
> > On Monday, December 2, 2024 9:32:27 AM MST Andreas Tille wrote:
> >> Attracting newcomers
> >>
> >>
> >> In my own talk[mt3], I regret not leaving enough time for questions--my
> >
Soren Stoutner writes:
> On Monday, December 2, 2024 9:32:27 AM MST Andreas Tille wrote:
>> Attracting newcomers
>>
>>
>> In my own talk[mt3], I regret not leaving enough time for questions--my
>> apologies for this. However, I want to revisit the sole question raised,
>> wh
Hi,
On 04/12/2024 15:18, Soren Stoutner wrote:
Robert,
I appreciate your addition to the discussion.
On Wednesday, December 4, 2024 8:53:07 AM MST Robert Chéramy wrote:
1) Documentation
There was a lot of reading involved (no problem here - it is great to
have a detailed documentation) but it
Am Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 09:09:40PM +0100 schrieb Simon Josefsson:
> But after seeing the ping's I decided to help on packages that
> happened to be some that I had some familiarity with already. So at
^^^
> least for these packages, ping's
Andrey Rakhmatullin writes:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 08:03:49PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> I suspect the RFS process would be more successful in finding a sponsor
>> if the requests went to debian-devel rather than another opt-in mailing
>> list. I rarely go looking for more work to do by
Am Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 10:46:03PM +0500 schrieb Andrey Rakhmatullin:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 10:39:52AM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> > I have directed several RFS (Request For Sponsor) towards appropriate
> > teams,
> > when then exist. However, my personal experience is that the majority o
On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 08:03:49PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> I suspect the RFS process would be more successful in finding a sponsor
> if the requests went to debian-devel rather than another opt-in mailing
> list. I rarely go looking for more work to do by viewing
>
> https://bugs.debian.o
Soren Stoutner writes:
> On Wednesday, December 4, 2024 10:30:34 AM MST Andreas Tille wrote:
>> Am Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 06:15:22PM -0700 schrieb Soren Stoutner:
>> > I think one of the best things we could do to attract new contributors,
> and
>> > to encourage those who are currently Sponsored
Hello Soren,
Am 04.12.24 um 19:18 schrieb Soren Stoutner:
Robert,
I appreciate your addition to the discussion.
On Wednesday, December 4, 2024 8:53:07 AM MST Robert Chéramy wrote:
1) Documentation
2. A vast amount of the step-by-step documentation written for beginners
regarding how to
Robert,
I appreciate your addition to the discussion.
On Wednesday, December 4, 2024 8:53:07 AM MST Robert Chéramy wrote:
> 1) Documentation
> There was a lot of reading involved (no problem here - it is great to
> have a detailed documentation) but it was very confusing that there were
> differe
On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 10:39:52AM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> I have directed several RFS (Request For Sponsor) towards appropriate teams,
> when then exist. However, my personal experience is that the majority of RFS
> that come into Debian Mentors do not fit neatly into any existing team.
On Wednesday, December 4, 2024 10:30:34 AM MST Andreas Tille wrote:
> Am Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 06:15:22PM -0700 schrieb Soren Stoutner:
> > I think one of the best things we could do to attract new contributors,
and
> > to encourage those who are currently Sponsored Maintainers to become
Debian
>
Am Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 06:15:22PM -0700 schrieb Soren Stoutner:
>
> I think one of the best things we could do to attract new contributors, and
> to
> encourage those who are currently Sponsored Maintainers to become Debian
> Maintainers, and those who are current Debian Maintainers to become
Am Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 01:49:33PM +0500 schrieb Andrey Rakhmatullin:
> raise certain
> barriers between the package and other people.
The current barrier appears to be the ITS procedure[1], which I now
engage with nearly daily through the "Bug of the Day"[2] workflow.
Previously, the requirement
On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 04:53:07PM +0100, Robert Chéramy wrote:
> 1) Documentation
> There was a lot of reading involved (no problem here - it is great to have a
> detailed documentation) but it was very confusing that there were different
> guides addressing the same things:
>
> Debian Developper
Package: wnpp
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, Debian Python Team
Owner: Roland Mas
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: python-nxtomomill
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Contact: Henri Payno
* URL : https://gitlab.esrf.fr/tomotools/nxtomomill
* License :
Package: wnpp
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, Debian Python Team
Owner: Roland Mas
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: python-processview
Version : 1.3.3
Upstream Contact: Henri Payno
* URL : https://gitlab.esrf.fr/workflow/processview
* License
Note - This email was originally send directly to Andreas Tille, as my
MUA ignored his "Mail-Followup-To: header".
Andreas asked me to answer to debian-devel@lists.debian.org. Please note
that I have not subscribed to debian-devel and do not plan to subscribe
at the moment. If you want me to rea
Package: wnpp
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, Debian Python Team
Owner: Roland Mas
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: python-ewoksorange
Version : 0.9.0
Upstream Contact: Wout De Nolf
* URL : https://gitlab.esrf.fr/workflow/ewoks/ewoksorange
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Philip Hands
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-ace-code
Version : 1.35.4
Upstream Contact: Fabian Jakobs
* URL : http://github.com/ajaxorg/ace
* License : BSD-3-Clause
Programming Lang: J
Hi Guillem (2024.12.04_13:03:29_+)
> > Are there other layers that could reasonably be used to implement a more
> > general form of parallelism limiting based on system RAM? Ideally, we'd
> > consolidate these implementations into fewer places.
>
> I think adding this in dpkg-buildpackage itse
Hi!
On Wed, 2024-12-04 at 14:03:30 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-11-28 at 10:54:37 +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > Are there other layers that could reasonably be used to implement a more
> > general form of parallelism limiting based on system RAM? Ideally, we'd
> > consolidate these
Hi!
On Thu, 2024-11-28 at 10:54:37 +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> I am one of those who builds a lot of different packages with different
> requirements and found that picking a good parallel=... value in
> DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS is hard. Go too low and your build takes very long. Go
> too high and you
On 2024/12/04 11:04, Aurélien COUDERC wrote:
Plasma 6 has now migrated to testing/trixie and things are looking pretty good.
That's great news! Thanks for all the work!
-Jonathan
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Colin Watson
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-flatdict
Version : 4.0.1
Upstream Contact: Gavin M. Roy
* URL : https://github.com/gmr/flatdict
* License : BSD-3-Clause
Programming Lang:
Dear all,
Le samedi 23 novembre 2024, 13:14:40 UTC+1 Aurélien COUDERC a écrit :
> Dear fellow developers and Plasma users,
>
> after some months living in experimental and lots of positive feedback, we're
> about to upload Plasma 6 to unstable.
> The plans of the Qt / KDE team is to release Trix
39 matches
Mail list logo
